MPO Meeting Minutes

Draft Memorandum for the Record

Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Meeting

March 7, 2024, Meeting

10:00 AM–12:20 PM, Zoom Video Conferencing Platform

Steve Woelfel, Chair, representing Monica Tibbits-Nutt, Secretary of Transportation and Chief Executive Officer of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT)

Decisions

The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) agreed to the following:

Meeting Agenda

1.    Introductions

See attendance on page 12.

2.    Chair’s Report—Steve Woelfel, MassDOT

There was none.

3.    Executive Director’s Report—Tegin Teich, Executive Director, Central Transportation Planning Staff

T. Teich discussed staffing updates and open positions at the agency.

T. Teich stated that the next two MPO meetings will be held in-person at the State Transportation Building, with a virtual participation option.

T. Teich stated that staff developed a template to be used for letters of support towards federal discretionary grant applications. In October, the board discussed a process for the development of these letters. The chair and vice chair will review requests for letters of support and, if approved, they will work with staff to determine whether the request is aligned with the MPO’s stated vision, goals, and objectives. If so, staff will draft a letter, to be signed by the chair. Updates, questions, and concerns will be brought to the full board as feasible given application deadlines.

Discussion

Brian Kane, MBTA Advisory Board, asked if the chair’s signature would be the Secretary of Transportation or a designee. T. Teich stated that past practices have been for David Mohler to sign as a designee of the Secretary of Transportation.

4.    Public Comments  

Senator Joan Lovely stated that she is present today to get acquainted with the TIP process especially as it connects to Salem projects, which will be discussed at future meetings.

Kristina Johnson, Town of Hudson, discussed the town’s design pilot application, spoke of benefits of this pilot to smaller communities, and discussed opportunities to close gaps in the regional trail network.

Sarkis Sarkisian, City of Framingham, discussed the City’s application to the project design pilot for its Chris Walsh Trail project.

Jim Nee, MetroWest Regional Transit Authority (MWRTA), thanked staff for their collaboration and spoke of benefits that could come from the authority’s application for low-emission, full-sized vehicles.

5.    Committee Chairs’ Reports

Derek Krevat, MassDOT, stated that the Unified Planning Work Program Committee will meet following this meeting to discuss the Universe of Proposed Studies for the fiscal year 2025 UPWP.

Tom Bent, Inner Core Committee (City of Somerville), stated that the Memorandum of Understanding Update Committee settled on a recommendation for regional transit authority representation, which will be brought before the board shortly.

Jen Rowe, City of Boston (Boston Transportation Department), stated that the TIP Process, Engagement, and Readiness Committee will meet twice in March.

B. Kane stated that the Administration and Finance Committee met on February 29, 2024, and received an update on the Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS) budget and progress towards the Executive Director’s annual goals.

6.    Regional Transportation Advisory Council Report—Lenard Diggins, Chair, Regional Transportation Advisory Council

L. Diggins stated that in the upcoming Advisory Council meeting members will begin to discuss revisions to the Advisory Council’s role in updates to the Memorandum of Understanding.

7.     Action Item: Approval of January 18, 2024, MPO Meeting Minutes

Documents posted to the MPO meeting calendar

1.    January 18, 2024, meeting minutes (pdf) (html)

Vote

A motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of January 18, 2024, was made by the City of Boston (J. Rowe) and seconded by the Inner Core Committee (T. Bent). The motion carried.

8.    Action Item: Transit Asset Management (TAM) Performance Targets—Sam Taylor, MPO Staff, and Angela Servello, MBTA Staff

Documents posted to the MPO meeting calendar

1.    Transit Asset Management Memo (pdf) (html)

2.    MBTA Transit Asset Management Plan (pdf)

3.    MWRTA Transit Asset Management Plan (pdf)

4.    CATA Transit Asset Management Plan (pdf)

S. Taylor stated that the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requires that MPOs and transit agencies set TAM performance measures. S. Taylor stated that transit agencies are required to develop TAM plans every four years and report asset inventories to the National Transit Database and set performance targets annually. MPOs must set TAM targets for their region, consider transit capital programming in the content of TAM performance, and incorporate TAM information into planning documents.

S. Taylor stated that the four TAM performance measures track the percentage of rolling stock vehicles that have met or exceeded their Useful Life Benchmark (ULB), percentage of equipment vehicles that have met or exceeded their ULB, percentage of assets with condition rating below 3.0 on the FTA Transit Economic Requirements Model, and the percentage of track segments with performance restrictions, by mode. Performance measures can be found in Tables 1 through 7.


 

Table 1
MBTA Rolling Stock Performance Targets

Vehicle Type

FY 2022 Actual

FY 2023 Actual

FY 2024 Target

Articulated Bus

0.00%

21.19%

23.73%

Bus

32.29%

20.00%

17.26%

Commuter Rail Locomotive

23.46%

22.89%

22.89%

Commuter Rail Passenger Coach

7.63%

7.52%

6.83%

Ferryboat

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Heavy Rail Passenger Car

53.39%

30.10%

28.57%

Light Rail Vehicle

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Vintage Trolley

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

Automobile

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Van

0.00%

0.00%

25.06%

 

Table 2
MBTA Equipment Performance Targets

Vehicle Type

FY 2022
Actual

FY 2023
Actual

FY 2024 Target

Automobile

69.84%

84.13%

84.13%

Other Rubber Tire Vehicle

18.75%

21.61%

26.07%

Steel Wheel Vehicle

37.78%

49.11%

51.31%

 


 

Table 3
MBTA Facilities Performance Targets

Facility Type

FY 2022 Actual

FY 2023 Actual

FY 2024 Target

Administrative/Maintenance

34.89%

22.84%

22.84%

Passenger/Parking

6.97%

2.55%

3.10%

 

Table 4
MBTA Infrastructure Performance Targets

Mode

Total Revenue Miles

FY 2022 Actual

FY 2023 Actual

FY 2024 Target

Light Rail

59.81

1.88%

7.36%

15.65%

Heavy Rail

76.54

6.80%

13.20%

17.18%

Commuter Rail

641.31

3.41%

3.25%

4.00%

 


 

Table 5
RTA Rolling Stock Performance Targets

Agency

Vehicle Type

Performance
(2023)

Target
(2023)

Target
(2024)

CATA

Buses and Trolleys

42%

30%

39%

CATA

Cutaway Vehicles

41%

5%

44%

MWRTA

Automobiles

100%

100%

100%

MWRTA

Cutaway Vehicles

21%

25%

21%

MWRTA

Vans

0%

0%

0%

 

CATA = Cape Ann Transportation Authority. MWRTA = MetroWest Regional Transit Authority. RTA = Regional Transit Authority.

 

Table 6
RTA Equipment Vehicles Performance Targets

Agency

Vehicle Type

Performance
(2023)

Target
(2023)

Target
(2024)

CATA

Equipment

100%

100%

100%

MWRTA

Equipment

50%

50%

50%

CATA = Cape Ann Transportation Authority. MWRTA = MetroWest Regional Transit Authority. RTA = Regional Transit Authority.

 

 

Table 7
RTA Facilities Performance Targets

Agency

Facility Type

Performance
(2023)

Target
(2023)

Target
(2024)

CATA

Administration/
Maintenance

0%

0%

0%

MWRTA

Administration/
Maintenance

0%

0%

0%

CATA = Cape Ann Transportation Authority. MWRTA = MetroWest Regional Transit Authority. RTA = Regional Transit Authority.

 

Discussion

B. Kane stated that he reviewed the performance targets with staff prior to this meeting and is satisfied with what has been proposed.

Steve Olanoff, Three Rivers Interlocal Council, asked if stormwater management systems are included in the facilities performance measure. A. Servello, MBTA, stated that she would confirm and follow up on the matter.

Jim Fitzgerald, City of Boston (Boston Planning and Development Agency), asked what timeline the full TAM plans operate under. S. Taylor stated that regional transit authorities submit four-year TAM plans to the FTA. A. Servello stated that this tracking is one element of TAM. J. Rowe requested that future presentations include information on long-term asset management plans. A. Servello discussed the impact that vehicle overhauls have on asset planning metrics.

Vote

A motion to approve the Transit Asset Management Performance Targets was made by the MBTA Advisory Board (B. Kane) and seconded by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) (Eric Bourassa). The motion carried.

9.     Action Item: FFYs 2024–28 TIP Amendment Five—Ethan Lapointe, MPO Staff

Documents posted to the MPO meeting calendar

1.    FFYs 2024–28 TIP Amendment Five (pdf) (html)

E. Lapointe stated that Amendment Five proposes two modifications for the FFYs 2024 and 2025 Statewide Highway Program. This includes the delay of the Middleton—Bridge Replacement of Route 62 over Ipswich River project to FFY 2025 and the Boston—Bridge Preservation, 5 Bridges Carrying State Route 1A (East Boston) and Ramps project to FFY 2025. The amendment contains additional details for existing MBTA projects in TIP tables.

Vote

A motion to release the FFYs 2024–28 TIP Amendment Five for its 21-day public review period was made by the Regional Transportation Advisory Council (L. Diggins) and seconded by the MAPC (E. Bourassa). The motion carried.

10.  FFYs 2025–29 TIP Project Scores—Ethan Lapointe, MPO Staff

Documents posted to the MPO meeting calendar

1.    Project Scores (pdf) (html)

2.    Project Descriptions (pdf) (html)

E. Lapointe reviewed the TIP development timeline. E. Lapointe stated that staff received 30 project applications. There were 15 applications for the project design pilot, four for construction, one for Transit Transformation, and 10 for Community Connections. This does not include CATA and MWRTA fill-in projects, which are currently being scored.

Project scores can be found below:

·       Design Pilot: Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections

o   Cambridge: New Bridge and Shared-Use Path Connection over MBTA Fitchburg Line at Danehy Park Connector (613568): 78.1

o   Framingham: Chris Walsh Trail (Phase II): 73.9

o   Hudson: Massachusetts Central Rail Trail (MCRT) Extension: 61.7

o   Norfolk-Wrentham-Walpole: Shared-Use Path Installation, Metacomet Greenway (613644): 65

·       Design Pilot: Complete Streets

o   Acton: Great Road, from Harris Street to Davis Road Intersections, Complete Streets Project: 45.4

o   Arlington: Broadway Complete Streets 25% Design: 80.1

o   Boston: Reconstruction of Bennington Street, Porter Street to Wood Island Busway: 76.2

o   Malden: Route 60 Improvement Project: 71.15

o   Malden: Commercial Street Reconstruction: 62.25

o   Marlborough Reconstruction of Granger Boulevard (612285): 61.9

o   Salem: Broad Street and Dalton Parkway Corridor Project: 60.1

o   Southborough: Reclamation of Marlborough Road (Route 85) and Framingham Road from Marlborough City Line to Route 30 (612962): 52.5

·       Design Pilot: Intersection Improvements

o   Burlington: Intersection Improvements at Route 3A/Cambridge Street and Winn Street (613641): 62.5

o   Holliston: Intersection Improvements at Route 16 and Whitney Street: 42.8

o   Sherborn: Reconstruction of Route 27 and Route 16: 81.8

·       Construction: Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections

o   Sudbury–Framingham: Bike Path Construction of Bruce Freeman Rail Trail, from the Sudbury Diamond Railroad Crossing to Eaton Road West: Score to be determined

·       Construction: Complete Streets

o   Bellingham: Roadway Rehabilitation of Route 126 from I-495 Ramps to Medway Town Line: 54.3

o   Ipswich: Argilla Road Ecological Tidal Restoration Project: 37.9

·       Construction: Intersection Improvements

o   Quincy: Intersection Improvements at Willard Street and Ricciuti Drive (610823): 41.1

·       Transit Transformation

o   MWRTA: Procurement of Three 29-Foot Buses: 52.2

·       Community Connections

o   Arlington: Installation of 123 Bicycle Racks and Related Materials: 74.5

o   Boston: Installation of 1,600 Bicycle Racks: 82

o   Scituate: Installation of 25 Bicycle Racks: 45.5

o   Malden: Canal Street Bicycle Lanes: 51.25

o   Chelsea-Revere: Regional On-Demand Microtransit Pilot Project: 53.75

o   Revere: Bluebikes Expansion, Four Stations and 40 Pedal Bicycles: 63.5

·       Bikeshare Replacement Projects:

o   Boston: Replacement of 12 Stations and Station Electrification Pilot: 76.5

o   Brookline: Replacement of Three Stations and 62 Pedal Bicycles: 59

o   Cambridge: Replacement of Eight Stations and 65 pedal bicycles: 68.5

o   Somerville: Replacement of 13 Stations: 67.5

E. Lapointe stated that staff engaged regional transit authorities for fill-in projects in FFYs 2025 and 2026. CATA is proposing three projects for 2025: $65,000 in fare improvements for ADA and Dial-a-Ride service, $1,293,000 in operations facility upgrades, and $2,460,000 to replace four buses with hybrids. MWRTA seeks $2,500,000 to redesign its Blandin Hub. A list of MBTA projects is in development and will be shared with the board at a future date.

Discussion

E. Bourassa asked about the total dollar amount requested from design pilot applications. E. Lapointe stated that the total amount of design requests was $18.4 million, while $4 million was initially set aside for the pilot.

E. Bourassa asked about the available funding in FFYs 2028 and 2029. E. Lapointe stated that FFY 2028 would begin with a deficit, but proposed scenarios have reduced the deficit to a surplus of less than $1 million. In FFY 2029 there would be about $11 million in unprogrammed funding, after accounting for readiness and new project applications.

E. Bourassa requested that the MBTA and MassDOT Highway Division prepare lists of fill-in projects for available near-term funding.

E. Bourassa requested that project proponents are present at upcoming TIP Process, Engagement, and Readiness Committee meetings.

Kristen Guichard, Minuteman Advisory Council on Interlocal Coordination (Town of Acton), asked what the process would be for communities to propose projects for fill-in funding. E. Lapointe stated that an appropriate project would need at least 25 percent design status with MassDOT.

L. Diggins asked what fare improvements CATA would implement as part of its fill-in project. E. Lapointe stated that these improvements would enhance abilities to accept cash as a form of payment on board.

Dennis Giombetti, MetroWest Regional Collaborative (City of Framingham), asked what are the unprogrammed, available funds in FFYs 2025 and 2026. E. Lapointe stated that approximately $25 million and $10 million is unprogrammed in FFYs 2025 and 2026, respectively.

Ken Miller, Federal Highway Administration, asked for the Project Review Committee’s cost estimate of the Cambridge—New Bridge and Shared-Use Path Connection over MBTA Fitchburg Line at Danehy Park Connector project (613568). E. Lapointe stated that the most recent figure is $19 million, but the Project Review Committee’s figure has not been made public yet.

Sandy Johnston, MBTA, stated that updated cost estimates will be brought to the board soon and asked which forum the MBTA should provide information for.

J. Rowe stated that lists of fill-in projects would be helpful for the next TIP Process, Engagement, and Readiness Committee meeting.

11.Members’ Items

There were none.

12. Adjourn

A motion to adjourn was made by the MAPC (E. Bourassa) and seconded by the Regional Transportation Advisory Council (L. Diggins). The motion carried.


 

Attendance

Members

Representatives

and Alternates

At-Large City (City of Everett)

Jay Monty

Eric Molinari

At-Large City (City of Newton)

David Koses

At-Large Town (Town of Arlington)

John Alessi

At-Large Town (Town of Brookline)

Erin Chute

City of Boston (Boston Planning & Development Agency)

Jim Fitzgerald

City of Boston (Boston Transportation Department)

Jen Rowe

Federal Highway Administration

Joshua Barber

Federal Transit Administration

 

Inner Core Committee (City of Somerville)

Brad Rawson

Massachusetts Department of Transportation

Steve Woelfel

John Bechard

MassDOT Highway Division

John Romano

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)

Sandy Johnston

Massachusetts Port Authority

Sarah Lee

MBTA Advisory Board

Brian Kane

Metropolitan Area Planning Council

Eric Bourassa

MetroWest Regional Collaborative (City of Framingham)

Dennis Giombetti

Minuteman Advisory Group on Interlocal Coordination (Town of Acton)

Kristen Guichard

North Shore Task Force (City of Beverly)

Darlene Wynne

North Suburban Planning Council (Town of Burlington)

Melisa Tintocalis

Regional Transportation Advisory Council

Lenard Diggins

South Shore Coalition (Town of Hull)

Chris DiIorio

South West Advisory Planning Committee (Town of Wrentham)

Rachel Benson

Three Rivers Interlocal Council (Town of Norwood)

Tom O’Rourke

Steve Olanoff

 

 

Other Attendees

Affiliation

Stephanie Abundo

DOT

Sarah Bradbury

MassDOT District 3

Miranda Briseño

MassDOT

Tenzin Choephel

City of Cambridge

Heidi Doyle

Sherborn Town Planner

Daniela Espinosa

Boston Planning & Development Agency

JR Frey

Town of Hingham

Joy Glynn

MWRTA

Pam Helinek

Walter Heller

Pare Corporation

Kirstie Hostetter

Town of Milton

Kristina Johnson

Town of Hudson

Sean Killeen

Chris Klem

MassDOT

Josh Klingenstein

MBTA

Raissah Kouame

MassDOT

Derek Krevat

MassDOT

Marie L (no last name given)

Jackie LaFlam

CATA

Aleida Leza

Senator Joan Lovely

Second Essex District

Owen MacDonald

Town of Weymouth

Addie Mae Weiss

Town of Sherborn

Jeremy Marsette

Richard McCarthy

Town of Norfolk

Benjamin Muller

MassDOT District 6

Jim Nee

MWRTA

Sheila Page

Town of Lexington

Chris Reilly

Sarkis Sarkisian

City of Framingham

Gareth Saunders

Cara Seiderman

City of Cambridge

Cheryll-Ann Senior

MassDOT District 5

Angela Servello

MBTA

Derek Shooster

MassDOT

Cam Sullivan

MWRTA

Tyler Terrasi

MWRTA

Meghan Todd

City of Framingham

Frank Tramontozzi

City of Quincy

Paula Walsh

Andrew Wang

MassDOT

 

MPO Staff/Central Transportation Planning Staff

Tegin Teich, Executive Director

Judy Day

Annette Demchur

Betsy Harvey

David Hong

Jia Huang

Ali Kleyman

Ethan Lapointe

Erin Maguire

Rebecca Morgan

Srilekha Murthy

Gina Perille

Sarah Philbrick

Sean Rourke

Samuel Taylor

 


 

CIVIL RIGHTS NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC

Welcome. Bem Vinda. Bienvenido. Akeyi. 欢迎. 歡迎.

https://gallery.mailchimp.com/947cd3931665a4ac4033565ea/images/bb14d00b-7e0e-4330-ac91-85d387945d95.png

 

You are invited to participate in our transportation planning process, free from discrimination. The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is committed to nondiscrimination in all activities and complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin (including limited English proficiency). Related federal and state nondiscrimination laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of age, sex, disability, and additional protected characteristics.

 

For additional information or to file a civil rights complaint, visit www.bostonmpo.org/mpo_non_discrimination.

 

To request accommodations at meetings (such as assistive listening devices, materials in accessible formats and languages other than English, and interpreters in American Sign Language and other languages) or if you need this information in another language, please contact:

 

Boston Region MPO Title VI Specialist

10 Park Plaza, Suite 2150

Boston, MA 02116

Phone: 857.702.3700

Email: civilrights@ctps.org

 

For people with hearing or speaking difficulties, connect through the state MassRelay service, www.mass.gov/massrelay. Please allow at least five business days for your request to be fulfilled.