Memorandum
Date September 20, 2012
TO Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization
FROM Karl H. Quackenbush
CTPS Executive Director
RE Work Program for: Completion of Green Line Extension New Starts Analysis
Review and approval
That the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization, upon the recommendation of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, vote to approve the work program for Completion of Green Line Extension New Starts Analysis in the form of the draft dated 09/20/2012.
Planning Studies
22336
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Project Supervisor: Andrew Brennan
Principal: Karl H. Quackenbush
Manager: Bruce Kaplan
New MBTA Contract
The MPO staff has sufficient resources to complete this work in a capable and timely manner. By undertaking this work, the MPO staff will neither delay the completion nor reduce the quality of other work in the UPWP.
The work program outlined below is intended to provide planning and modeling assistance to the client, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), as part of completion of work on a New Starts submission for the Green Line Extension. CTPS has recently finished work on the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and provided support for the draft New Starts submission to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Completion of the New Starts submission is contingent upon utilization of the Boston Region MPO’s most recent Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Paths to a Sustainable Region, adopted on September 22, 2011. CTPS’s continuing support for the New Starts submission will involve revisiting the draft New Starts modeling efforts in light of the new LRTP and updating results using the most current data.
The objectives of this work program are:
The Boston Region MPO’s regional travel demand model set will be used to produce outputs for the New Starts submission to FTA.
CTPS will use the latest version of the base-year model in this study. Specific attention will be paid to further calibration of the study area transit and roadway networks to replicate existing conditions. Results from the base-year model will be summarized to provide certain systemwide statistics, as well as study-area-specific data, such as daily boardings and access-mode shares on major transit services.
A well-calibrated travel demand model set for the study area
CTPS will produce forecasts for two horizon years: the opening year and the 2035 design horizon year. Model inputs—socioeconomic data, congested-highway travel times, auto operating costs, CBD parking costs, transit fares, and travel times—will be consistent with the currently adopted land use and background transportation projects assumed in Paths to a Sustainable Region . MAPC and other relevant agencies, such as other MPOs, as well as MassDOT, will be consulted about the best demographic and land use assumptions to use in this planning effort for conducting the opening-year analysis and responding to FTA’s request for more defined demographic forecasts in New Starts submissions.
Model inputs for both the opening and design horizon years
Using the model work done for Paths to a Sustainable Region, CTPS will create no-build networks for the two forecast years: the opening year and the design horizon year. Forecast-year model runs will be conducted for these no-build scenarios, and the results will be summarized at the same levels of detail as for the base year.
A complete summary of travel forecasts for the no-build scenario in both forecast years
In this task, CTPS will model the proposed alternative and analyze the results for both the opening and design horizon years. Several sensitivity tests will be conducted in this task.
The proposed alternative will be analyzed for the opening and design horizon years. Mode choice and highway assignment results will be summarized in tabular form. Aggregate statistics such as total linked and unlinked transit trips will be summarized by submode. These statistics will form the basis for determining the utilization of the proposed service.
CTPS will investigate the potential for changes to study area bus service given the future presence of the new Green Line extension. Different alternatives will be examined for minimizing corridor bus mileage while best complementing and maximizing the Green Line Extension ridership. This may or may not result in bus route reconfigurations and modifications to the proposed alternative.
A complete summary of travel forecasts for the proposed alternative and documentation of the sensitivity testing of corridor bus routes
Current FTA guidance mandates the development of a Transportation System Management/Baseline alternative for the design horizon year. This relatively low-cost scenario is supposed to provide the best study area transit options without the introduction of fixed-guideway (rail/busway) service. Such a scenario has already been created and approved by FTA in the draft New Starts submission. Outputs from the model similar to the ones in Task 4 will be processed and examined.
A complete summary of travel forecasts for the Baseline alternative for the opening and design horizon years of analysis
CTPS will analyze, by time period, opening and design horizon year peak load and capacity concerns on the entire Green Line rapid transit service, specifically in the currently heavily traveled Central Subway portion shared by the four different Green Line branches. The ridership demand under the Build scenario examined in Task 4 will be measured against the carrying capacity of each of the Green Line branches. CTPS will provide this information to other study team members and assist them in the development of station and platform designs that adequately meet capacity demands.
Memorandum presenting the peak load and capacity analysis
CTPS will use the results of the travel demand model forecasts to run the FTA-developed SUMMIT software and produce tables showing transportation user benefits, comparing the Build scenario to the Baseline alternative. User benefits, similar to travel time savings, are used in the cost-effectiveness formula that FTA considers in reviewing New Starts submissions. Several maps showing the pattern of travel time savings will be generated using results from the SUMMIT software. Additionally, the transit trip flows by mode will be analyzed to determine the origins and destinations of the markets in the study area. Graphics will be produced to show the spatial distribution of the primary beneficiaries of the project.
Tables, maps, and a memorandum summarizing results obtained using the SUMMIT software
On January 25, 2012, FTA proposed a new series of evaluative measures for New Starts work. Among these are metrics for mobility, cost-effectiveness, environmental standards, economic development, operating efficiencies, livability, regional air quality, greenhouse gas emission, and land use. CTPS will work to provide appropriate results once these criteria are officially established. Particular attention will be paid to quantifying the benefits associated with economic agglomeration and clustering of development. This is expected to require the rental and/or purchase of specialized economic forecasting software.
Estimates the new New Starts evaluative measures
Travel model results will serve as the starting point for estimating likely passenger revenue associated with each scenario. The revenue estimates will take into consideration the different regional transit agencies’ fare structures and parking revenue by operating entity. CTPS will also assist the projects team’s financial consultant in the development of its financial plan.
Passenger revenue estimates for each transit scenario
The travel demand model set that CTPS will use in this study will be developed based on a set of assumptions that cover a broad spectrum of topics. The confidence in many of these assumptions decreases the further we go into the future. Assumptions such as costs, land use, and other transit investments are all major inputs into the travel demand modeling process and can potentially be a major area of uncertainty in relation to future conditions. Sensitivity testing will be undertaken to test the degree to which these assumptions could impact future Green Line Extension ridership and other performance measures.
Memorandum explaining and documenting the uncertainty analysis
Major transit service changes, such as the Green Line Extension, are required by MBTA service delivery policy, FTA Title VI regulations, and FTA New Starts requirements to be examined to ensure that they do not unfairly burden low-income and minority communities, also known as “environmental-justice communities.” A Service and Fare Equity Analysis will be conducted to comply with these requirements. Prior environmental-justice analyses performed by CTPS have been judged by FTA to address all of the equity issues that need to be investigated in a Service and Fare Equity Analysis. Hence, CTPS will conduct an environmental-justice analysis, focusing on performance measures—accessibility to health care, higher education, and jobs; mobility and congestion; and environmental impacts—that serve as indicators of benefits and burdens for environmental-justice and non-environmental-justice communities.
Memorandum explaining and documenting the Service and Fare Equity Analysis
CTPS will produce two technical memoranda concerned with overall project documentation. One will describe the modeling methodology, while the other will present the results of Task 1’s model calibration. These memoranda are separate from the memoranda listed for prior tasks.
Modeling methodology memorandum and calibration memorandum
CTPS will coordinate with and assist MBTA and its project team throughout the project, especially focusing on the FTA New Starts grant submission process. It is anticipated that CTPS will participate in up to 17 internal team meetings and 2 public meetings.
Written products and data requested by the client, in appropriate forms
It is estimated that this project will be completed seven and a half months after the notice to proceed is received. The proposed schedule, by task, is shown in Exhibit 1.
The total cost of this project is estimated to be $191,747. This includes the cost of 62.5 person-weeks of staff time, overhead at the rate of 96.58 percent, printing, travel, equipment, consultants, and other direct costs. A detailed breakdown of estimated costs is presented in Exhibit 2.
KQ/SAP/BK/yb
Task |
Month | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
1.
Perform Study Area Base-Year Model Calibration |
From month 1 to 2.5.
| |||||||||||
2.
Prepare Inputs for Forecast Years |
From month 2 to 3.
| |||||||||||
3.
Conduct No-Build Model Runs for the Forecast Years |
From month 2.5 to 3.5.
| |||||||||||
4.
Run Model for Proposed Alternative |
From month 3.2 to 5.
| |||||||||||
5.
Run Model for the Approved FTA Baseline Alternative |
From month 3.5 to 5.
Month 5, deliverable A, New Starts templates, Maps.
| |||||||||||
6.
Analyze Green Line Capacity |
From month 4.5 to 5.5.
Month 5.5, deliverable B, Capacity Memorandum.
| |||||||||||
7.
Estimate Transportation User Benefits — SUMMIT |
Month 1, deliverable , .
From month 4 to 6.
| |||||||||||
8.
Estimate New Evaluative New Starts Measures |
From month 4 to 7.
| |||||||||||
9.
Estimate Passenger Revenue |
From month 5.5 to 7.
| |||||||||||
10.
Quantify Uncertainties |
From month 5 to 7.
Month 7, deliverable C, Uncertainty Memorandum.
| |||||||||||
11.
Conduct Service and Fare Equity Analysis |
From month 6.5 to 10.5.
Month 10.5, deliverable D, Service and Fare Equity Analysis Memorandum.
| |||||||||||
12.
Produce Technical Memoranda |
From month 4 to 13.
Month 11, deliverable E, Calibration Memorandum.
Month 13, deliverable F, Mothodology Memorandum.
| |||||||||||
13.
Assist with FTA New Starts Program Grant Submission |
From month 1 to 13.
|
Task |
Person-Weeks | Direct Salary |
Overhead (96.58%) |
Total Cost |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M-1 | P-5 | P-4 | Total | ||||
1.
Perform Study Area Base-Year Model Calibration |
0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | $4,418 | $4,267 | $8,684 |
2.
Prepare Inputs for Forecast Years |
0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | $3,363 | $3,248 | $6,610 |
3.
Conduct No-Build Model Runs for the Forecast Years |
0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | $3,363 | $3,248 | $6,610 |
4.
Run Model for Proposed Alternative |
1.0 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 9.5 | $13,044 | $12,598 | $25,642 |
5.
Run Model for the Approved FTA Baseline Alternative |
0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | $4,417 | $4,266 | $8,682 |
6.
Analyze Green Line Capacity |
0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | $4,418 | $4,267 | $8,684 |
7.
Estimate Transportation User Benefits — SUMMIT |
1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | $5,480 | $5,293 | $10,773 |
8.
Estimate New Evaluative New Starts Measures |
1.5 | 1.0 | 7.5 | 10.0 | $13,683 | $13,215 | $26,899 |
9.
Estimate Passenger Revenue |
1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | $4,218 | $4,074 | $8,292 |
10.
Quantify Uncertainties |
1.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 4.5 | $6,319 | $6,103 | $12,422 |
11.
Conduct Service and Fare Equity Analysis |
0.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | $4,210 | $4,066 | $8,276 |
12.
Produce Technical Memoranda |
3.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | $11,808 | $11,404 | $23,212 |
13.
Assist with FTA New Starts Program Grant Submission |
1.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 6.0 | $8,628 | $8,332 | $16,960 |
Total |
11.0 | 9.0 | 42.5 | 62.5 | $87,368 | $84,380 | $171,747 |