Memorandum
Date March 5, 2015
TO Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization
FROM Karl H. Quackenbush
CTPS Executive Director
RE Work Program for: Title VI Service Equity Analysis: Methodology Development
Review and approval
That the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization vote to approve the work program for Title VI Service Equity Analysis: Methodology Development, presented in this memorandum
Technical Support/Operations Analysis Projects
11396
Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization
Principal: Annette Demchur
Manager: Nicholas Hart
MPO §5303 Contract #78922
This is MPO work and will be carried out in conformance with the priorities established by the MPO.
As a recipient of Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding, the MBTA is required to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The FTA provides its funding recipients with guidance to carry out the US Department of Transportation’s Title VI regulations in FTA Circular 4702.1B, which is dated October 1, 2012. For providers of public transportation that “operate 50 or more fixed-route vehicles in peak service and that are “located in an Urbanized Area (UZA) of 200,000 or more in population,” the circular includes a specific requirement of conducting a service equity analysis prior to the implementation of any and all service changes that exceed the transit provider’s major service-change threshold. The purpose of the service equity analysis is to determine if the planned service change will have a disparate impact on minority populations and/or if low-income populations will bear a disproportionate burden from the change.
The FTA circular instructs transit providers to develop written procedures for how they will perform the required service equity analysis in conformance with the MBTA’s policies on major service changes, disparate impacts, and disproportionate burdens. Additionally, the FTA describes a framework for evaluating the impacts of proposed service changes on both minority and low-income populations. However, the guidance provided in the circular is vague and inconsistent, and the methodological framework presented fails to fully examine the magnitude of the impacts of service changes. As defined by the FTA, the methodology for conducting the disparate-impact and disproportionate burden analyses deals only with the proportion of minority or low-income riders affected, relative to all riders, but does not include an objective methodology for evaluating the relative magnitude of the impacts of the changes.
In this project, staff will develop a methodology for defining and analyzing the effects of major service changes to provide more meaningful information about the magnitude of the effects of those changes on minority and low-income populations and to ensure congruity across all procedures and policies related to Title VI service equity analysis. By completing this work, the MPO will continue to adhere to its commitment to conducting industry-leading Title VI and other transportation-equity-related work.
The work required to accomplish the project’s objectives will be carried out in the five tasks described below.
MPO staff will identify and categorize the strengths and weaknesses of the current state of the practice for conducting Title VI service equity analysis. To accomplish this, staff members will review FTA guidance and requirements, previous analyses of MBTA transit service changes, Title VI analysis procedures used by other agencies, and will conduct a literature review on transportation equity analysis. The findings of this review will be used to identify potential components of the new methodology.
An outline of the strengths and weaknesses of the current state of the practice of Title VI service equity analysis
MPO staff will investigate alternative approaches to conducting Title VI service equity analysis, evaluate the benefits and limitations of each approach, and develop an improved methodology that would mitigate the shortcomings of the existing methodologies that were identified in Task 1. The approaches to be considered will incorporate methods for quantifying the magnitude of the expected benefit or burden based on the type and degree of major service change, and local factors such as the presence of other transit services available to affected riders. Staff will recommend the approach that best accomplishes these improvements while promoting consistency across all transit modes and all types of major service changes.
Assessment of the benefits and limitations of several approaches to performing Title VI equity analysis
The selection of metrics to be included in the methodology will depend on the framework of the approach selected in Task 2. Each of the metrics will function as an indicator of the benefits and burdens associated with a major service change, and the set of metrics included in the methodology will be selected to interact together to indicate the total magnitude of benefits and burdens of each proposed major service change. The selected metrics will promote consistency across all transit modes and all types of major service changes, utilizing available data and resources.
MPO staff will conduct sensitivity analyses of the proposed methodology and its metrics to evaluate its appropriateness and to assess the degree of influence each metric has on the estimated total impact when applied to each type of major service change. This will influence the adjustments that may need to be made to the methodology or selection of metrics. Staff will recommend a methodology and will incorporate it into the written procedures of future MBTA Title VI service equity analysis.
The findings and products of Tasks 1–4 will be documented in a technical memorandum.
A technical memorandum documenting the major findings of the project
It is estimated that this project will be completed six months after work commences. The proposed schedule, by task, is shown in Exhibit 1.
The total cost of this project is estimated to be $55,000. This includes the cost of 22.3 person-weeks of staff time and overhead at the rate of 91.82 percent. A detailed breakdown of estimated costs is presented in Exhibit 2.
KQ/NH/nh
Task |
Month | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
1.
Review the Current State of the Practice |
From month 1 to 2.
| |||||
2.
Develop Methodology |
From month 1.7 to 3.5.
| |||||
3.
Select Metrics |
From month 2.8 to 5.4.
| |||||
4.
Conduct Sensitivity Analyses |
From month 5.2 to 6.3.
| |||||
5.
Document Findings |
From month 5.4 to 7.
Deliverable A, Technical memorandum delivered by Month 7
|
Task |
Person-Weeks | Direct Salary |
Overhead (91.82%) |
Total Cost |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M-1 | P-4 | P-3 | Total | ||||
1.
Review the Current State of the Practice
|
0.2 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.2 | $2,555 | $2,346 | $4,901 |
2.
Develop Methodology
|
1.2 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 5.7 | $7,066 | $6,488 | $13,553 |
3.
Select Metrics
|
1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | $6,163 | $5,659 | $11,823 |
4.
Conduct Sensitivity Analyses
|
1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | $3,960 | $3,636 | $7,595 |
5.
Document Findings
|
2.6 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 6.4 | $8,929 | $8,199 | $17,127 |
Total
|
6.0 | 0.8 | 15.5 | 22.3 | $28,673 | $26,327 | $55,000 |