Appendix A: Project Prioritization and Scoring
Appendix B: Greenhouse Gas Monitoring and Evaluationn
Appendix C: Public Engagement and Comments
Appendix D: Geographic Distribution of TIP Funding
Appendix E: Regulatory and Policy Framework
Appendix F: Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Membership
Appendix G: Operations and Maintenance Summary
Abbreviation |
Term |
---|---|
3C |
continuous, comprehensive, cooperative [metropolitan transportation planning process] |
AAB |
Massachusetts Architectural Access Board |
AADT |
average annual daily traffic |
ABP |
Accelerated Bridge Program [MassDOT program] |
AC |
advance construction |
ACS |
American Community Survey [US Census Bureau data] |
ADA |
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
AFC |
automated fare collection |
ALI |
Activity Line Item |
ARPA |
American Rescue Plan Act |
BIL |
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law |
BFP |
Bridge Formula Program [federal funding program] |
BR |
Bridge [highway investment program] |
BRT |
bus rapid transit |
CA/T |
Central Artery/Tunnel [project also known as “the Big Dig”] |
CAA |
Clean Air Act |
CAAA |
Clean Air Act Amendments |
CARES Act |
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act |
CATA |
Cape Ann Transportation Authority |
CECP |
Massachusetts Clean Energy and Climate Plan |
CFR |
Code of Federal Regulations |
CIP |
Capital Investment Plan [MassDOT] |
CMAQ |
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality [federal funding program] |
CMR |
Code of Massachusetts Regulations |
CMP |
Congestion Management Process |
CNG |
compressed natural gas |
CO |
carbon monoxide |
CO2 |
carbon dioxide |
CPT–HST |
Coordinated Public Transit–Human Services Transportation Plan |
CRRSAA |
Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act |
CTPS |
Central Transportation Planning Staff |
CY |
calendar year |
DCR |
Department of Conservation and Recreation |
DEP |
Department of Environmental Protection [Massachusetts] |
DOD |
United States Department of Defense |
DOT |
department of transportation |
DVR |
digital video recorder |
EB |
eastbound |
EDTTT |
excessive delay threshold travel time |
EJ |
environmental justice |
EO |
executive order |
EOEEA |
Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs |
EOHED |
Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development |
EPA |
United States Environmental Protection Agency |
EPDO |
equivalent property damage only [a traffic-related index] |
EV |
electric vehicle |
FARS |
Fatality Analysis and Reporting System [FHWA] |
FAST Act |
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act |
FEMA |
Federal Emergency Management Agency |
FFY |
federal fiscal year |
FHWA |
Federal Highway Administration |
FMCB |
MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board |
FMLA |
Federal Land Management Agency |
FR |
Federal Register |
FTA |
Federal Transit Administration |
GANS |
grant anticipation notes [municipal bond financing] |
GHG |
greenhouse gas |
GWSA |
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2008 [Massachusetts] |
HIP |
Highway Infrastructure Program [federal funding program] |
HOV |
high-occupancy vehicle |
HSIP |
Highway Safety Improvement Program [federal funding program] |
I |
Interstate |
ICC |
Inner Core Committee [MAPC municipal subregion] |
IRI |
International Roughness Index |
ITS |
intelligent transportation systems |
LED |
light-emitting diode |
LEP |
limited English proficiency |
LF |
local funds |
LOTTR |
level of travel time ratio |
LRTP |
Long-Range Transportation Plan [MPO certification document] |
MAGIC |
Minuteman Advisory Group on Interlocal Coordination [MAPC municipal subregion] |
MAP-21 |
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act |
MAPC |
Metropolitan Area Planning Council |
MARPA |
Massachusetts Association of Regional Planning Agencies |
MART |
Montachusett Regional Transit Authority |
MassDOT |
Massachusetts Department of Transportation |
Massport |
Massachusetts Port Authority |
MBTA |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority |
MCRT |
Mass Central Rail Trail |
MOVES |
Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator [EPA air quality model] |
MPO |
metropolitan planning organization |
MOU |
memorandum of understanding |
MWRC |
MetroWest Regional Collaborative [MAPC municipal subregion] |
MWRTA |
MetroWest Regional Transit Authority |
NAAQS |
National Ambient Air Quality Standards |
NB |
northbound |
NBI |
National Bridge Inventory |
NEVI |
National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Program [federal funding program] |
NFA |
Non-federal aid |
NGBP |
Next Generation Bridge Program [MassDOT program] |
NH DOT |
New Hampshire Department of Transportation |
NHFP |
National Highway Freight Program [federal funding program] |
NHPP |
National Highway Performance Program [federal funding program] |
NHS |
National Highway System |
NHTSA |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration |
NMCOG |
Northern Middlesex Council of Governments |
NOx |
nitrogen oxides |
NPMRDS |
National Performance Measure Research Data Set [FHWA] |
NSPC |
North Suburban Planning Council [MAPC municipal subregion] |
NSTF |
North Shore Task Force [MAPC municipal subregion] |
NTD |
National Transit Database |
OF |
other federal funding |
O&M |
operations and management |
PBPP |
performance-based planning and programming |
PEN |
penalty funding |
PHED |
peak hours of excessive delay |
PL |
metropolitan planning funds [FHWA] or public law funds |
PM |
particulate matter |
PNF |
project need form [MassDOT] |
ppm |
parts per million |
PRC |
Project Review Committee [MassDOT] |
PSAC |
Project Selection Advisory Council [MassDOT] |
PSI |
Pavement Serviceability Index |
PTASP |
Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan |
RITIS |
Regional Integrated Transportation Information System |
RRIF |
Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing |
RTA |
regional transit authority |
RTAC |
Regional Transportation Advisory Council [of the Boston Region MPO] |
RTACAP |
Regional transit authority capital funds |
SB |
southbound |
SFY |
state fiscal year |
SHSP |
Strategic Highway Safety Plan |
SIP |
State Implementation Plan |
SMS |
safety management systems |
SOV |
single-occupant vehicle |
SPR |
Statewide Planning and Research |
SRTS |
Safe Routes to School [federal program] |
SSC |
South Shore Coalition [MAPC municipal subregion] |
STRAHNET |
Strategic Highway Network |
STBG |
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program [federal funding program] |
STIP |
State Transportation Improvement Program |
SWAP |
South West Advisory Planning Committee [MAPC municipal subregion] |
TAM |
Transit Asset Management Plan |
TAMP |
Transportation Asset Management Plan |
TAP |
Transportation Alternatives Program [federal funding program] |
TAZ |
transportation analysis zone |
TBD |
to be determined |
TCM |
transportation control measure |
TE |
transportation equity |
TERM |
Transit Economic Requirements Model [FTA] |
TFPC |
Total Federal Participating Cost |
TIFIA |
Transportation Infrastructure and Innovation Act |
TIP |
Transportation Improvement Program [MPO certification document] |
TMA |
transportation management association |
TRIC |
Three Rivers Interlocal Council [MAPC municipal subregion] |
TSP |
transit signal priority |
TTTR |
Truck Travel Time Reliability Index |
ULB |
useful life benchmark |
UPWP |
Unified Planning Work Program [MPO certification document] |
USC |
United States Code |
USDOT |
United States Department of Transportation |
UZA |
urbanized area |
WB |
westbound |
VPI |
virtual public involvement |
VMT |
vehicle-miles traveled |
VOCs |
volatile organic compounds |
VRM |
vehicle revenue-miles |
VUS |
Vulnerable User Safety [federal funding program] |
As described in Chapter 2, the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) development and project prioritization and funding process consists of numerous phases and is supported by several different funding sources. This appendix includes information about transportation projects that the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) considered for funding through the Highway Discretionary (Regional Target) Program in the federal fiscal years (FFYs) 2024–28 TIP.
To be considered for funding by the MPO, a project must fulfill certain basic criteria. Projects evaluated through the MPO’s Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections, Complete Streets, Intersection Improvements, and Major Infrastructure investment programs must meet these criteria:
For projects evaluated through the MPO’s Community Connections Program, the following criteria apply:
If a project meets the above criteria, it is presented to the MPO board in the Universe of Projects (Table A-1) to be considered for funding. This project list is presented to the MPO board in November and provides a snapshot of information available on projects at that stage in the TIP development. Some projects that get evaluated for funding may not appear in the Universe, as more project information may become available following the compilation of the Universe. In addition, some projects that appear on the Universe list may not be evaluated each year if these projects are not actively being advanced by municipal or state planners or if they are not at the minimum required level of design for evaluation. Community Connections projects are not typically included in the Universe because proponents of those projects apply for funding through a discrete application process, the submission deadline for which is after the presentation of the Universe to the MPO board.
Once a proponent provides sufficient design documentation for a project in the Universe and the municipality or state is actively prioritizing the project for funding, the project can be evaluated by MPO staff. The evaluation criteria used to score projects are based on the MPO’s goals and objectives. After the projects are evaluated, the scores are shared with project proponents, posted on the MPO’s website, and presented to the MPO board for review and discussion. The scores for projects evaluated during development of the FFYs 2024–28 TIP for programming in the MPO’s Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections, Complete Streets, and Intersection Improvements programs are summarized in Table A-3. No projects were evaluated for inclusion in the Major Infrastructure investment program during the development of the FFY 2024-28 TIP. Scores for projects that applied for funding through the MPO’s Community Connections Program during the FFYs 2024–28 TIP cycle are summarized in Table A-4.
The MPO board approved a suite of changes to the TIP project selection criteria in October 2020. One of the central goals was to create distinct criteria for each investment program to allow for evaluations to be conducted in ways that better reflect the nuances of different types of transportation projects. For this reason, the project selection criteria for each investment program are shown in separate tables in this appendix as follows: Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections (Table A-5); Community Connections (Table A-6); Complete Streets (Table A-7); Intersection Improvements (Table A-8); and Major Infrastructure (Table A-9). Archived project evaluation criteria for all investment programs, which were discontinued in October 2020 after the FFYs 2021–25 TIP cycle, are shown in Tables A-10 and A-11.
In addition to project scores, several other factors are taken into consideration by the MPO when selecting projects for funding. Table A-2 describes many of these elements, including the relationships between the MPO’s FFYs 2024–28 Regional Target projects and the MPO’s Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), studies and technical assistance conducted by MPO staff through the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), the federally required performance measures discussed in Chapter 4, and Massachusetts’ modal plans. These projects are listed by MPO investment program. More details about each of these projects are available in the funding tables and project descriptions included in Chapter 3. Performance-related information for the FFYs 2024–28 Regional Target projects is included in Chapter 4, and information about greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for these projects is available in Appendix B.
Table A-1
FFYs 2024–28 TIP Universe of Projects
Projects grouped by MAPC subregion and by MPO Investment Program | |||||||||
This table contains unprogrammed projects in the Boston region that may be considered for evaluation in the FFYs 2024-28 TIP cycle. Not all projects listed in this table will be evaluated for funding in the FFYs 2024-8 TIP, as projects must be PRC approved and submit sufficient project documentation prior to scoring. The MPO has also established a policy to prioritize projects that have reached the 25% design submission stage for funding. This list is subject to change as more project information is received. | |||||||||
Key | |||||||||
Evaluated for FFYs 2023-27 TIP | |||||||||
New project in TIP universe for FFYs 2024-28 TIP | |||||||||
In 2023-27 universe, not evaluated | |||||||||
Municipality | Project Proponent | Project Name | PROJIS | Design Status (as of 10/6/21) | Year Added to Universe | Cost Estimate | Highway District | Notes | Previous Evaluation Score |
Inner Core | |||||||||
Complete Streets | |||||||||
Boston | Boston | Reconstruction of Albany Street | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 6 | Pursuing 2022 PRC approval. | N/A |
Boston | MassDOT | Reconstruction on Gallivan Boulevard (Route 203), from Neponset Circle to East of Morton Street Intersection | 606896 | PRC approved (2012) | 2018 | $11,500,000 | 6 | Resulted from FFY 2012 Addressing Priority Corridors MPO Study | N/A |
Boston | MassDOT | Improvements on Morton Street (Route 203), from West of Gallivan Boulevard to Shea Circle | 606897 | PRC approved (2012) | 2018 | $11,500,000 | 6 | Resulted from FFY 2012 Addressing Priority Corridors MPO Study | N/A |
Boston | Boston | Roadway Improvements along Commonwealth Avenue (Route 30), from Alcorn Street to Warren/Kelton Streets (Phase 3 & Phase 4) | 608449 | 25% submitted (9/28/2017) |
2017 or earlier | $31,036,006 | 6 | Last scored for FFYs 2020-24 TIP. | 56 |
Boston | MassDOT | Intersection & Signal Improvements at VFW Parkway and Spring Street | 607759 | 25% Package Received - R1 (3/09/2022) | 2022 | $4,526,907 | 6 | N/A | |
Boston | MassDOT | Gallivan Boulevard (Route 203) Safety Improvements, from Washington Street to Granite Avenue | 610650 | PRC approved (2019) | 2019 | $5,750,000 | 6 | Priority for District 6. Road safety audit being initiated. | N/A |
Brookline | Brookline | Boylston Street (High Street to Brington Road) Complete Streets Improvements | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | $3,500,000 | 6 | Ped crossings, bike lanes, street trees. Design through Toole with some facilitation from MassDOT. Three options were pushed through and endorsed by the Select Board. Town met with District 6 to run through this. Should be in PRC soon. | N/A |
Brookline | Brookline | Davis Street Path Restoration and Reconstruction of the Davis Street Path Bridge over MBTA | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | $12,000,000 | 6 | Conceptual stage. Brookline is investigating avenues to use federal discretionary grant funding to advance this project. Potential for bundling with Boylston Street work above. | N/A |
Chelsea | Chelsea | Reconstruction of Spruce Street, from Everett Avenue to Williams Street | 610675 | PRC approved (2019) | 2019 | $5,408,475 | 6 | N/A | |
Chelsea | Chelsea | Reconstruction of Everett Avenue and 3rd Street, from Broadway to Ash Street | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2020 | N/A | 6 | N/A | |
Chelsea | Chelsea | Reconstruction of Marginal Street | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2019 | N/A | 6 | N/A | |
Lynn, Salem | MassDOT | Reconstruction of Route 107 | 608927 | PRC approved (2017) | 2020 | $38,155,000 | 4 | N/A | |
Malden | Malden | Broadway Corridor Reconstruction | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | N/A | 4 | Malden is currently holding community meetings to discuss this project, with the most recent one being held 10.25.2022. | N/A |
Melrose | Melrose | Reconstruction of Lebanon Street, from Lynde Street to Malden City Line | 612534 | PRC approved (2/10/2022) | 2020 | $3,742,432 | 4 | N/A | |
Newton | Newton | Reconstruction of Washington Street, from Church Street to Chestnut Street | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2020 | N/A | 6 | N/A | |
Revere | Revere | Reconstruction of Ocean Ave, Revere Street, and Revere Beach Boulevard | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2020 | N/A | 4 | Project at conceptual stage with schematics, needs full design - investigating roundabout. Key East/West connection. | N/A |
Winthrop | Winthrop | Reconstruction & Improvements on Route 145 | N/A | PRC approved (2019) | 2019 | $7,565,512 | 6 | N/A | |
Intersection Improvements | |||||||||
Boston, Brookline | Boston, Brookline | Mountfort St. & Commonwealth Ave. Connection | 608956 | PRC approved (2017) | 2018 | $916,883 | 6 | Preliminary design. | N/A |
Medford | Medford | Intersection Improvements at Main Street and South Street | 611974 | PRC approved (2021) | 2019 | $8,498,000 | 4 | Project location studied by CTPS. Priority for municipality. Design is in progress, and eventually the City will work with MassDOT to fund construction. | N/A |
Newton | MassDOT | Route 16 at Quinobequin Road | 612613 | PRC approved (2/10/2022) | 2022 | $4,350,000 | 6 | Reconfiguration of the interchange may result in consideration of this project for the LRTP. | |
Quincy | MassDOT | Intersection Improvements at Route 3A (Southern Artery) and Broad Street | 608569 | PRC approved (2016) | 2020 | $2,900,000 | 6 | Priority for District 6. | N/A |
Quincy | Quincy | Intersection Improvements at Willard Street and Ricciuti Drive | 610823 | 25% Package Received (9/28/2022) | 2020 | $1,544,650 | 6 | 25% design complete. PM is Kathy Dougherty. | N/A |
Quincy | Quincy | Merrymount Parkway Phase II | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | N/A | 6 | December PRC. | N/A |
Bicycle and Pedestrian | |||||||||
Boston | Boston | Fenway Multi-Use Path Phase III | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 6 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Brookline | Brookline | Beacon Street Bridle Pathway | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | N/A | 6 | Project in conceptual design through Toole, receipt of a MassTrails grant in 2020 for feasibility study. Limits would be Audubon Circle to Cleveland Circle. | N/A |
Everett, Somerville | DCR | Mystic River Bicycle and Pedestrian Crossing | 612004 | PRC approved (2021) | 2021 | $38,218,334 | 4 | N/A | |
Lynn, Nahant | Lynn, Nahant | Northern Strand Extension | 610919 | DPH (11/17/2021) | 2020 | $9,363,750 | 4 | N/A | |
Medford | Medford | Wellington Phase 4 Shared Use Path | 613082 | Pre-PRC | 2022 | $1,195,000 | 4 | ID # is not yet in PINFO. Initiated on 11/3/2022. Includes an earmark and Gaming Commission money. | N/A |
Medford | Medford | MacDonald Park Pedestrian Bridge | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | $800,000 | 4 | In DCR park, City is requesting expansion of bridge to 10-12feet in width to coordinate with shared use pathway. | N/A |
Major Infrastructure | |||||||||
Boston, Chelsea | Boston | Bridge Rehabilitation and Fender Pier Replacement, Meridian Street Over Chelsea Creek (Andrew P. McArdle Bridge) | 600637 | PRC Approved (2/10/2022) | 2021 | $97,538,787 | 6 | N/A | |
Cambridge | DCR | Intersection Improvements at Fresh Pond Parkway/Gerry's Landing Road, from Brattle Street to Memorial Drive | 609290 | PRC approved (2018) | 2019 | $7,000,000 | 6 | Short-term improvements being initiated. | N/A |
Revere, Malden | MassDOT | Improvements on Route 1 (NB) Add-A-Lane | 610543 | PRC approved (2019) | 2019 | $7,210,000 | 4 | Project is not programmed in Destination 2040. It is located on a regionally significant roadway. If this work includes capacity-adding elements, and it is programmed in the TIP, it will need to be included in Destination 2050. | N/A |
Newton | MassDOT | Traffic Signal and Safety Improvements at Interchange 127 (Newton Corner) | 609288 | PRC approved (2018) | 2019 | $14,000,000 | 6 | N/A | |
Medford | Medford | Roosevelt Circle Interchange Reconfiguration | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | TBD | 4 | As discussed on 11.4.2022 with the City of Medford, the City is looking to reconfigure the ramps and adjacent local roadways to improve traffic safety following the results of a RSA along this corridor. Includes improvements for bicycle, pedestrian, and transit access. Given the state of repair on the bridges, this may be coordinated with bridge rehabilitation work for these structures over I-93. | N/A |
Boston | Boston | Cambridge Street Bridge Replacement - Charlestown | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | N/A | 6 | City wants this programmed to advertise this before Rutherford Avenue enters construction. This is a difficult bridge under I-93 and next to Sullivan Square. | N/A |
Revere | Revere | Route 1A Improvement and Reconfiguration | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | $9-12,000,000 | 4 | Project is in conceptual design stage. The priority is to reconfigure the loop ramps at the General Edwards Bridge to facilitate redevelopment of the area, for which there are already parcel developments planned. The reconfiguration will entail construction of a new roundabout and improved pedestrian crossings to improve access to the riverfront and Point of Pines area along Revere. Per the City, this reconfiguration is intended to work with the Lynnway Multimodal Corridor improvements, but will also not impact construction for the General Edwards Bridge replacement. | N/A |
Revere, Saugus | Revere, Saugus | Roadway Widening on Route 1 North (Phase 2) | 611999 | PRC approved (2021) | 2021 | $2,397,600 | 4 | Project is not programmed in Destination 2040. It Is on a regionally-significant roadway and would add roadway capacity. If programmed in the TIP, this project will also need to be included in Destination 2050. Robins Road to Route 99 interchange are the limits. |
N/A |
Minuteman Advisory Group on Interlocal Coordination | |||||||||
Complete Streets | |||||||||
Bedford | Bedford | Roadway Reconstruction of Route 4/225 (The Great Road) | 612739 | PRC approved (5/12/2022) | 2022 | $10,899,448 | 4 | Limits appear to go from North Road to match line near Loomis Street. SRTS project completed in the area under 608000. | N/A |
Intersection Improvements | |||||||||
Littleton | Littleton | Intersection Improvements at Route 119/Beaver Brook Road | 610702 | PRC approved (2020) | 2020 | $3,120,110 | 3 | MassDOT agreed to fund design after 25% design approved. As of October 2022, the project remains in preliminary design. | N/A |
Bicycle and Pedestrian | |||||||||
Bedford | Bedford | Minuteman Bikeway Extension, From Loomis Street to Concord Road (Route 62) | 607738 | 47 | 2022 | $11,218,186 | 4 | Local concerns about permitting. Previously programmed in FY23-27, dropped due to public opposition. Failed to achieve 2/3rds majority in town meeting on 11.14.2022. | N/A |
Concord | Concord | Assabet River Multi-Use Trail and Bridge Construction | 612870 | PRC approved (8/29/2022) | 2020 | $8,280,000 | 4 | Project was originally a new Pedestrian Bridge with a $2-3.6M price range. Scope has increased to include improvements for a multi-use trail alongside the bridge. Cost has increased accordingly, and is now in preliminary design. Project location runs between the West Concord MBTA Station and the Concord Meadows Corporate Center with a hookup to the Southern Terminus of the Bruce Freeman. |
N/A |
Major Infrastructure | |||||||||
Acton | MassDOT | Intersection Improvements at Route 2 and Route 27 Ramps | 610553 | PRC approved (2019) | 2020 | $3,480,000 | 3 | Project not programmed in LRTP (meets MPO roadway classification requirement). Priority for District 3 and Town of Acton. Project has had surveying and MSA design contracts opened for it. MassDOT appears to be tracking as a Traffic Safety improvement. |
N/A |
Concord | Concord | Reconstruction & Widening on Route 2, from Sandy Pond Road to Bridge over MBTA/B&M Railroad | 608015 | PRC approved (2014) | 2019 | $8,000,000 | 4 | Project is not programmed in Destination 2040. It is on a regionally significant roadway and includes roadway widening elements. If programmed in the TIP, this project should also be included in Destination 2050. | N/A |
Lexington | Lexington | Route 4/225 (Bedford Street) and Hartwell Avenue | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2019 | $30,557,000 | 4 | Project is programmed in Destination 2040 (FFYs 2030-34). The project is expected to include work on the I-95 Interchange with Route 4/225. If this work includes capacity-adding elements, it will need to be included in Destination 2050. | N/A |
MetroWest Regional Collaborative | |||||||||
Complete Streets | |||||||||
Wellesley | Wellesley | Route 135 Reconstruction (Natick Town Line to Weston Road) | N/A | Pre-PRC | N/A | TBD | 6 | N/A | |
Holliston | Holliston | Reconstruction of Concord Street (Route 126) | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 3 | Added through subregional outreach. Project is municipal priority, as it's tied to necessary below-grade sewer work. 10/12/22: MaPIT is showing that a project was initiated back on 7.14.2020 for this stretch for resurfacing and related work, assuming $600K in total cost (likely lowball). |
N/A |
Intersection Improvements | |||||||||
Framingham | MassDOT | Roundabout Construction at Salem End Road, Badger Road and Gates Street | 609280 | PRC approved (2018) | 2019 | $2,520,000 | 3 | N/A | |
Weston | Weston | Intersection Improvements - Signalization of Route 20 at Highland Street | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 6 | Added through subregional outreach. | N/A |
Bicycle and Pedestrian | |||||||||
Weston | MassDOT | Weston - Shared Use Path Construction on Route 30 | 612602 | PRC Approved (2/10/2022) | 2022 | $1,050,000 | 6 | Meant to connect into Project 608954. District 6 priority to ensure that the shared-use-path there ties in to the rest of the bicycle network and concludes at a logical terminus. | N/A |
Natick | Natick | Cochituate Rail Trail Extension, from MBTA Station to Mechanic Street | 610691 | PRC approved (4/30/2020) | 2020 | $5,778,069 | 3 | Final section of Cochituate Rail Trail Extension. Imminent 25% design submittal. |
N/A |
Major Infrastructure | |||||||||
Framingham | Framingham | Intersection Improvements at Route 126/135/MBTA and CSX Railroad | 606109 | PRC approved (2010) | 2019 | $115,000,000 | 3 | Project is programmed in Destination 2040 (FFYs 2030-34). May need to be pushed back with LRTP rewrite. Consultant said that depressing Route 135 may be the solution. |
N/A |
North Suburban Planning Council | |||||||||
Complete Streets | |||||||||
Burlington | Burlington | Town Center Complete Streets Improvements | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 4 | Complete Streets upgrades along Route 3A from Bedford Street to Arthur Woods Avenue. The scope of work would be additive to existing resurfacing planned under 610704, and would focus mostly on paint. There is potential for widening if the town's design includes a multimodal path while maintaining the current number and width of vehicle lanes. | N/A |
Lynnfield | Lynnfield | Reconstruction of Summer Street | 609381 | PRC approved (2019) | 2019 | $21,521,921 | 4 | N/A | |
Reading | Reading | Reading Downtown Improvement Project | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2020 | $7-$8 million | 4 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Stoneham | Stoneham | Reconstruction of South Main Street, from Town Center to South Street | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 4 | N/A | |
Wakefield | Wakefield | Main Street Reconstruction (Water St. to Salem St.) | 610545 | 25% Design Complete | 2020 | $26,382,000 | 4 | Main St (Nahant to Water) and Water Street (Main to Cyrus) removed from project and bundled in 607329. 25% design incorporates some retention of angled parking in order to appease older public, but focus is on bike parking. Strong public input from youth during town meetings led to approval. |
41.8 |
Winchester | Winchester | Town Center Complete Streets Improvements | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 4 | N/A | |
Intersection Improvements | |||||||||
Stoneham | Stoneham | Intersection Improvements at Main Street (Route 28), Franklin Street, and Central Street | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2020 | N/A | 4 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Bicycle and Pedestrian | |||||||||
Stoneham, Wakefield | Stoneham, Wakefield | Mystic Highlands Greenway Project | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 4 | N/A | |
Community Connections | |||||||||
North Reading | North Reading | ||||||||
North Shore Task Force | |||||||||
Complete Streets | |||||||||
Beverly, Manchester-by-the-Sea | MassDOT | Resurfacing and Related Work on Route 127 | 607707 | PRC approved (2013) | 2018 | $2,300,000 | 4 | Still in preliminary design. | N/A |
Danvers | Danvers | Reconstruction on Collins Street, from Sylvan Street to Centre and Holten Streets | 602310 | 75% submitted (3/5/2010) | 2017 or earlier | $5,183,121 | 4 | Updated 75% design submission needed for project to move forward. Last scored for FFYs 2020-24 TIP. | 46 |
Ipswich | Ipswich | Reconstruction of County Road, from South Main Street to East Street | 611975 | PRC approved (2021) | 2020 | $5,653,500 | 4 | On 10/7/2022, Ipswich DPW mentioned that a bridge within the project limits has had a lane closed by MassDOT. Structure IDs are I01005, main concern is Ipswich - 2PN which is an 1861-built historic stone arch mill bridge. | 45.4 |
Ipswich | Ipswich | Argilla Roadway Reconstruction and Adaptation | 612738 | PRC Approved (5/12/2022) | 2021 | $4,628,419 | 4 | Municipal priority for funding. | N/A |
Marblehead | Marblehead | Bridge Replacement, M-04-001, Village Street over Marblehead Rail Trail (Harold B. Breare Bridge) | 612947 | PRC approved (9/15/2022) | 2019 | N/A | 4 | Per 10.11 email with C Quigley, the project received a PRC and a PROJIS ID in September 2022 after a PNF was submitted 8/2022. |
N/A |
Manchester-by-the-Sea | Manchester-by-the-Sea | Pine Street - Central Street (Route 127) to Rockwood Heights Road | N/A | Pre-PRC; PNF submitted (12/27/16) | 2017 or earlier | N/A | 4 | N/A | |
Manchester-by-the-Sea | Manchester-by-the-Sea | Bridge Replacement, M-02-001 (8AM), Central Street (route 127) over Saw Mill Brook | 610671 | PRC approved (2019) | 2019 | $4,350,000 | 4 | 34.8 | |
Salem | MassDOT | Reconstruction of Bridge Street, from Flint Street to Washington Street | 5399 | 25% submitted (8/20/2004) | 2017 or earlier | $24,810,211 | 4 | Project is not programmed in Destination 2040. It is on a regionally significant roadway and would add roadway capacity. If it is programmed in the TIP, it will need to be programmed in Destination 2050. | N/A |
Wenham | Wenham | Safety Improvements on Route 1A | 609388 | 25% Approved (9/10/2021) | 2019 | $3,629,036 | 4 | N/A | |
Wenham | Wenham | Roadway Reconstruction on Larch Row and Dodges Row | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2019 | $800,000 | 4 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Intersection Improvements | |||||||||
Essex | Essex | Targeted Safety Improvements on Route 133 (John Wise Avenue) | 609315 | PRC approved (2019) | 2019 | $2,135,440 | 4 | N/A | |
Bicycle and Pedestrian | |||||||||
Peabody, Salem | Peabody, Salem | Riverwalk Project | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 4 | MVP grant issued for project design. | N/A |
Marblehead | Marblehead | B2B Bikeway Design - Marblehead | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | $140,000 | 4 | Earmark. May be added via amendment. | |
Peabody, Salem | Peabody, Salem | B2B Bikeway Design - Peabody/Salem | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | $600,000 | 4 | Earmark. May be added via amendment. | |
Major Infrastructure | |||||||||
Beverly | Beverly | Interchange Reconstruction at Route 128/Exit 19 at Brimbal Avenue (Phase II) | 607727 | PRC Approved (2014) | 2021 | N/A | 4 | Project is not programmed in Destination 2040. Is on a regionally-significant roadway, and would expand the interchange. If this project is programmed in the TIP and adds roadway capacity, this project will need to be included in Destination 2050. | N/A |
South Shore Coalition | |||||||||
Complete Streets | |||||||||
Holbrook | Holbrook | Corridor Improvements and Related Work on South Franklin Street (Route 37) from Snell Street to King Road | 608543 | PRC approved (2017) | 2018 | $4,000,200 | 5 | N/A | |
Rockland | Rockland | Corridor Improvements on VFW Drive/Weymouth Street | 612605 | PRC approved (2/10/2022) | 2021 | $13,047,281 | 5 | PNF entered in Jan 2022 | N/A |
Weymouth | MassDOT | Reconstruction on Route 3A, Including Pedestrian and Traffic Signal Improvements | 608231 | PRC approved (2016) | 2017 or earlier | $10,780,100 | 6 | Pre-25% package submitted in July 2021. | N/A |
Weymouth | MassDOT | Resurfacing and Related Work on Route 3A | 608483 | PRC approved (2016) | 2018 | $2,400,000 | 6 | N/A | |
Intersection Improvements | |||||||||
Cohasset | Cohasset | Intersection Improvements at Route 3A and King Street | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 5 | Added through subregional outreach. | N/A |
Hull | Hull | Intersection Improvements at George Washington Boulevard and Barnstable Road/ Logan Avenue | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 5 | Added through subregional outreach. | N/A |
South West Advisory Planning Committee | |||||||||
Complete Streets | |||||||||
Bellingham | Bellingham | South Main Street (Route 126) - Elm Street to Douglas Drive Reconstruction | N/A | Pre-PRC; PNF submitted (3/13/17) | 2017 or earlier | N/A | 3 | Project would dovetail ongoing project 608887, rehab on Route 126 from Douglas Drive to Route 140. | N/A |
Franklin | MassDOT | Resurfacing and Intersection Improvements on Route 140, from Beaver Street to I-495 Ramps | 607774 | PRC approved (2014) | 2018 | $4,025,000 | 3 | N/A | |
Medway | Medway | Improvements on Route 109 West of Highland Street | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 3 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Milford | MassDOT | Resurfacing and Related Work on Route 16 | 612091 | PRC approved (2021) | 2021 | $4,192,500 | 3 | N/A | |
Millis | Millis | Town Center Improvements | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2020 | N/A | 3 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Wrentham | Wrentham | Resurfacing and Related Work on Route 1 | 608497 | PRC approved (2016) | 2020 | N/A | 5 | 25% design anticipated July 2022. | N/A |
Intersection Improvements | |||||||||
Medway | Medway | Traffic Signalization at Trotter Drive and Route 109 | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 3 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Sherborn | Sherborn | Intersection Improvements at Route 16 and Maple Street | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 3 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Wrentham | Wrentham | Intersection Improvements on Route 1A at North and Winter Street | 610676 | PRC Approved (12/19/2019) | 2020 | $2,649,000 | 5 | N/A | |
Wrentham | Wrentham | Intersection Improvements at Randall Road and Route 1A | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2020 | $2,649,000 | 5 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Wrentham | Wrentham | Intersection Improvements at Route 1A and Route 140 | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2020 | N/A | 5 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Bicycle and Pedestrian | |||||||||
Franklin | Franklin | Southern New England Trunk Trail (SNETT) Extension, from Grove Street to Franklin Town Center | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 3 | Project at conceptual stage. | |
Hopkinton | Hopkinton | Campus Trail Connector, Shared Use Trail Construction | 611932 | PRC approved (2020) | 2020 | $1,750,700 | 3 | N/A | |
Norfolk, Walpole, and Wrentham | Norfolk | Metacomet Greenway | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 5 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Sherborn | Sherborn | Upper Charles River Trail Extension to Framingham City Line | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 3 | Project at conceptual stage. | N/A |
Major Infrastructure | |||||||||
Bellingham | MassDOT | Ramp Construction & Relocation, I-495 at Route 126 (Hartford Avenue) | 604862 | PRC approved (2006) | 2017 or earlier | $13,543,400 | 3 | High priority for District 3 | N/A |
Three Rivers Interlocal Council | |||||||||
Complete Streets | |||||||||
Canton, Milton | MassDOT | Roadway Improvements on Route 138 | 608484 | PRC approved (2016) | 2020 | $18,467,500 | 6 | Milton also in ICC subregion. Project a high priority for the TRIC subregion. District is working to refine scope. . |
N/A |
Medfield | Medfield | Reconstruction of Route 109 | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 3 | Added through subregional outreach. | N/A |
Milton | MassDOT | Reconstruction on Granite Avenue, from Neponset River to Squantum Street | 608406 | 25% submitted (2/10/2017) | 2017 or earlier | $3,665,146 | 6 | Milton also in ICC subregion. | N/A |
Milton | Milton | Adams Street Improvements, from Randolph Avenue to Eliot Street | 610820 | PRC approved (4/30/2020) | 2020 | $1,799,330 | 6 | Milton also in ICC subregion. | N/A |
Needham | Needham | Reconstruction of Highland Avenue, from Webster Street to Great Plains Avenue | 612536 | PRC approved (10/21/2021) | 2021 | $10,402,402 | 6 | Needham also in ICC subregion. | N/A |
Dover, Needham | Dover, Needham | Centre Street Bridge Replacement | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2022 | N/A | 6 | Historic-eligible, needs replacement as it is 1850's era. | N/A |
Westwood | Westwood | Reconstruction of Canton Street | 608158 | 25% Package Received (2/18/2022) | 2017 or earlier | $19,047,306 | 6 | Priority for municipality. MassDOT expresses concerns regarding project readiness due to scope fluctuations. New shapefile is in development for MapIT, there is not one available right now. |
N/A |
Intersection Improvements | |||||||||
Foxborough | Foxborough | Intersection Signalization at Route 140/Walnut Street and Route 140/I-95 (SB Ramp) | 612740 | PRC Approved (5/12/2022) | 2021 | $11,902,600 | 5 | Added through subregional outreach. Town has advanced design outside of TIP process. District supports project. Budget has increased from original $5M estimate in 2021. | N/A |
Medfield | Medfield | Intersection Improvements at Route 27 and West Street | 612807 | PRC Approved (5/12/2022) | 2021 | $3,987,500 | 3 | Added through subregional outreach. | N/A |
Bicycle and Pedestrian | |||||||||
Canton | Canton | Warner Trail Extension, from Sharon to Blue Hills Reservation | N/A | Pre-PRC | 2021 | N/A | 6 | Added through subregional outreach. Feasibility study currently underway. | N/A |
Major Infrastructure | |||||||||
Canton, Westwood | MassDOT | Interchange Improvements at I-95 / I-93 / University Avenue / I-95 Widening | 87790 | 25% submitted (7/25/14) | 2017 or earlier | $202,205,994 | 6 | Project not programmed in Destination 2040. IIt is on a regionally-significant roadway and adds roadway capacity. If programmed in the TIP, this project would also need to be included in Destination 2050. Last scored for FFYs 2020-24 TIP. Regional priority, potential discretionary grant project via MassDOT for State Highway funding. |
47 |
Table A-2
FFYs 2024–28 Regional Target Projects and Their Relationships to Plans and Performance Measures
ID | Project Name | MPO Investment Program | Project Description | MPO Muncipalities | Programming Year (FFY) | Planning Relationships | Relationoships to Performance Measures |
609211 | Peabody–Independence Greenway Extension | Bicycle and Pedestrian | Extend the Independence Greenway from the North Shore Mall to central Peabody. | Peabody | 02024 | This project will extend the MassDOT Off-Street High Comfort Bike Network, as identified in the 2019 Massachusetts Bicycle Plan. | This project is expected to improve safety for bicyclists and pedestrians. It will create more than a mile of bike trail network and bring the Independence Greenway’s total length to eight miles. By extending the region’s bicycle network, this project is expected to increase non-SOV travel. It is also expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
610544 | Peabody–Multi-Use Path Construction of Independence Greenway at Interstate 95 and Route 1 | Bicycle and Pedestrian | Construct a new multi-use paved path along the abandoned railbed between two existing segments of the Independence Greenway in Peabody and create a connection to the existing Border to Boston trailhead at Lowell Street. | Peabody | 02025 | This project will extend the MassDOT Off-Street High Comfort Bike Network, as identified in the 2019 Massachusetts Bicycle Plan. | This project wzill create nearly two miles of multi-use trail, connect other segments of the Independence Greenway, and create a link to the Border to Boston trail. By connecting these sections of the regional bike network, this project is expected to increase non-SOV travel. Improved signalization near ramps to Route 1 may help facilitate motorized and nonmotorized traffic flow and reduce PHED on this NHS corridor. This project is also expected to improve safety for bicyclists and pedestrians and to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
S12114 | Canton–Royall Street Shuttle | Community Connections | Establish a shuttle service connecting Canton’s Royall Street employment cluster with the MBTA Route 128 commuter rail station and Ashmont, Mattapan Trolley, and Quincy Adams rapid transit stations. | Canton | 2023–24 | N/A | This project may increase non-SOV travel by providing a new transit option. It may reduce PHED and improve reliability on the NHS by providing an alternative to SOV travel on NHS routes in Canton. It is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
S12700 | Cape Ann Transportation Authority (CATA)–CATA On Demand Microtransit Service Expansion | Community Connections | Expand existing CATA On Demand microtransit service to Rockport and to an additional neighborhood in Gloucester, and to help customers reach a wider array of essential destinations. | Gloucester, Rockport | 2023–25 | N/A | This project may increase non-SOV travel by expanding CATA’s microtransit service to new areas and supporting its ability to serve customers beyond those commuting to transit or specific employment centers. It may reduce PHED and improve reliability on the NHS by providing an alternative to SOV travel on NHS routes in Gloucester and Rockport. This project is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
S12701 | MetroWest Regional Transit Authority (MWRTA) –CatchConnect Microtransit Service Expansion | Community Connections | Expand MWRTA’s CatchConnect microtransit service to Hudson and Marlborough, which will support connections to MWRTA’s fixed-route network. | Hudson, Marlborough | 2023–25 | N/A | This project may increase non-SOV travel by expanding microtransit service to new areas. It may reduce PHED and improve reliability on the NHS by providing an alternative to SOV travel on NHS routes in Hudson and Marlborough. This project is expected to help reduce CO2 emissions. |
S12703 | Montachusett Regional Transit Authority (MART) –MART Microtransit Service | Community Connections | Establish an on-demand microtransit service that will serve Bolton, Boxborough, Littleton, and Stow. | Bolton, Boxborough, Littleton, and Stow | 2023–25 | N/A | This project may increase non-SOV travel by providing a new transit option. It may reduce PHED and improve reliability on the NHS by providing an alternative to SOV travel on NHS routes in Boxborough, Bolton, Littleton, and Stow. It is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
S12694 | Newton–NewMo Microtransit Service Expansion | Community Connections | Expand an existing Newton-wide microtransit service (see project S12125) to include stops in six neighboring municipalities. | Newton [adding service to Boston, Needham, Waltham Watertown, Wellesley, and Weston] | 2023–25 | N/A | This project may increase non-SOV travel by expanding the reach of Newton’s existing microtransit service. It may reduce PHED and improve reliability on the NHS by providing an alternative to SOV travel on NHS routes in multiple MPO communities. This project is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
606453 | Boston–Improvements on Boylston Street | Complete Streets | Improve the roadway cross section, signals, and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations in the project corridor. | Boston | 02025 | N/A | The project area overlaps a 2017–19 HSIP all-mode crash cluster location, a 2010–19 HSIP bicycle crash cluster location, and a 2010–19 HSIP pedestrian crash cluster location. The project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It will improve more than two lane miles of substandard NHS pavement, will address reliability needs on an unreliable NHS segment, and may also reduce PHED on that segment. It will improve substandard sidewalks and add bicycle lanes in the project corridor; these features are expected to increase non-SOV travel. The project is also expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
610932 | Brookline–Rehabilitation of Washington Street | Complete Streets | Replace signals, reconstruct sidewalks and pavement, and provide protected bicycle facilities and dedicated bus pull-out spaces in the Washington Street corridor between Washington Square and Brookline Village. | Brookline | 02027 | N/A | The project area overlaps two 2010–19 HSIP bicycle crash cluster locations and a 2010–19 HSIP pedestrian crash cluster location. The project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It will improve substandard sidewalks, implement bicycle lanes, upgrade signals to include TSP, and add bus shelters to the corridor; these features are expected to increase non-SOV travel. The project is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
611983 | Chelsea–Park and Pearl Street Reconstruction | Complete Streets | Improve safety and mobility on Park and Pearl Street by improving signals and roadway geometry, reconstructing sidewalks, and adding bicycle facilities. | Chelsea | 02027 | N/A | The project area overlaps a 2017–19 HSIP all-mode crash cluster location, a 2010–19 HSIP bicycle crash cluster location, and two 2010–19 HSIP pedestrian crash cluster locations. The project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. The project will reconstruct sidewalks, improve bicycle amenities, and implement TSP; these features are expected to increase non-SOV travel. The project is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
608007 | Cohasset, Scituate– Corridor Improvements and Related Work on Justice Cushing Highway (Route 3A) from Beechwood Street to Henry Turner Bailey Road | Complete Streets | Improve the corridor from the Beechwood Street intersection to the Cohasset/Scituate town line. Upgrade traffic signal equipment, make geometric modifications at intersections, and provide bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. | Cohasset, Scituate | 02024 | This project location was studied in “Route 3A Subregional Priority Roadway Study in Cohasset and Scituate” (CTPS, 2014). | The project area overlaps a 2017–19 HSIP all-mode crash cluster location and the project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It is expected to add sidewalks and bicycle lanes in the project corridor, which may encourage non-SOV travel. The project is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
609257 | Everett– Rehabilitation of Beacham Street, from Route 99 to Chelsea City Line | Complete Streets | Reconstruct Beacham Street to reduce vehicular collisions and improve bicycle and pedestrian travel. | Everett | 02025 | N/A | This project is expected to improve transportation safety, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It will improve substandard sidewalks and include a shared-use path—both features may encourage non-SOV travel and improve safety performance. The project is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
605168 | Hingham–Intersection Improvements at Route 3A/Summer Street Rotary | Complete Streets | Improve multimodal access between Hingham Center, residential areas, and Hingham Harbor and make safety improvements, including by establishing a small roundabout at the intersection of Route 3A and Summer Street. | Hingham | 02025 | This project location was studied in “Summer Street/George Washington Boulevard Subregional Priority Roadway Study in Hingham and Hull” (CTPS, 2016). | The project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It will improve more than a lane mile of substandard pavement on the NHS, and the geometric improvements included in the project are expected to help reduce delay and potentially PHED on the NHS. The project is expected to improve substandard sidewalks, add new sidewalks, and add bicycle accommodations, including a shared-use path. These features may support increases in non-SOV travel. The project is also expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
605743 | Ipswich–Resurfacing and Related Work on Central and South Main Streets | Complete Streets | Reconstruct the roadway between Mineral Street and Poplar Street to improve the roadway surface. Make minor geometric improvements at intersections, include pedestrian crossings, and improve sidewalks. | Ipswich | 02026 | N/A | The project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It will improve more than a lane mile of substandard pavement on the NHS. It will upgrade substandard sidewalks, and it is expected to add bicycle lanes; both features may encourage non-SOV travel. The project is also expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
609054 | Littleton–Reconstruction of Foster Street | Complete Streets | Add turning lanes, consolidate curb cuts, and improve bicycle, pedestrian, and vehicular accommodations in the project corridor. | Littleton | 02024 | N/A | The project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It will include a shared-use path, which is expected to increase non-SOV travel. This project is also expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
609252 | Lynn–Rehabilitation of Essex Street | Complete Streets | Make key bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements and operational improvements, such as signal upgrades, in the project corridor. | Lynn | 02025 | N/A | The project area overlaps five 2017–19 all-mode HSIP crash cluster locations and three 2010–19 HSIP pedestrian crash cluster locations. The project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. Planned improvements to signals and roadway geometry in the corridor may help improve reliability on nearby unreliable NHS segments and may also reduce PHED on those segments. It is expected to reconstruct substandard sidewalks and add bicycle lanes; these features are expected to increase non-SOV travel. This project is also expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
609246 | Lynn– Reconstruction of Western Avenue | Complete Streets | Reconstruct Western Avenue between Centre Street and Eastern Avenue. Improve signal timing, intersection design, and bus stop locations. Implement bicycle and ADA-compliant pedestrian improvements. | Lynn | 2027-2028 | N/A | The project area overlaps five 2017–19 all-mode HSIP crash cluster locations, two 2010–19 HSIP pedestrian crash cluster locations and one 2010–19 HSIP bicycle crash cluster location. The project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians, and it will improve nearly 4 lane miles of substandard pavement on the NHS. The signal improvements included in the project are expected reduce delay and may help reduce PHED and improve reliability on the NHS. It will reconstruct sidewalks and add bike lanes, TSP, and bus amenities; these features are expected to increase non-SOV travel. This project is also expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
608045 | Milford–Rehabilitation on Route 16, from Route 109 to Beaver Street | Complete Streets | Improve vehicular safety and traffic flow through the implementation of a road diet, additional roadway reconstruction, bicycle and pedestrian accommodations, and enhanced signalization on Route 16 (East Main Street) from Route 109 (Medway Road) to Beaver Street. | Milford | 02026 | N/A | The project area overlaps a 2017–19 all-mode HSIP crash cluster location, and the project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. The project is also expected to upgrade substandard sidewalks, add new sidewalks, and add shared-use paths; these features are expected to increase non-SOV travel. |
110980 | Newton, Weston– Commonwealth Avenue (Route 30) over the Charles River | Complete Streets | Replace a deteriorated bridge over the Charles River. Reconstruct the Route 30 corridor in the vicinity of the I-95 and I-90 interchange, including several I-95 on-ramps. Improve sidewalks and pedestrian amenities, add a bike lane, and develop a segment of shared-use path along the Charles River. | Newton, Weston | 02024 | N/A | The project area overlaps a 2017–19 all-mode HSIP crash cluster locations and the project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It will replace a deteriorated NHS bridge structure and will improve one lane mile of substandard pavement on the NHS. Signal and geometric improvements on Route 30 and reconfiguration of the I-95 ramps may reduce PHED and improve reliability on the NHS. The shared-use path, sidewalk improvements, and bike lane included in the project are expected to increase non-SOV travel. This project is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
609432 | Salem–Boston Street Improvements | Complete Streets | Incorporate complete streets elements and a separated bicycle path into the corridor. Add a new signal at Boston Street and Aborn Street and upgrade existing signals at other intersections along the corridor. | Salem | 02026 | N/A | The project area overlaps a 2010–19 HSIP pedestrian crash cluster location, and the project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It is expected to improve more than a lane mile of substandard NHS pavement. The project includes signal and geometry improvements and is expected to reduce delay, which may reduce PHED and improve reliability on the NHS. It will implement sidewalks on both sides of the corridor and add separated bicycle facilities; these features are expected to increase non-SOV travel. This project is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
609437 | SALEM- PEABODY- BOSTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS | Complete Streets | Incorporate complete streets elements and a separated bicycle path into the corridor. Add a new signal at Boston Street and Aborn Street and upgrade existing signals at other intersections along the corridor. | Salem | 02026 | N/A | The project area overlaps a 2010–19 HSIP pedestrian crash cluster location, and the project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It is expected to improve more than a lane mile of substandard NHS pavement. The project includes signal and geometry improvements and is expected to reduce delay, which may reduce PHED and improve reliability on the NHS. It will implement sidewalks on both sides of the corridor and add separated bicycle facilities; these features are expected to increase non-SOV travel. This project is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
610662 | Woburn–Roadway and Intersection Improvements at Woburn Common, Route 38 (Main Street), Winn Street, Pleasant Street, and Montvale Avenue | Complete Streets | Improve safety and congestion within the Woburn Common area by making safety and operational improvements, reconfiguring the Woburn Common rotary, and reconstructing and realigning roadways. The project will also reconstruct sidewalks, add bike lanes, and upgrade or add signals in the area. | Woburn | 02026 | N/A | The project area overlaps a 2017–19 all-mode HSIP crash cluster location and a 2010–19 HSIP pedestrian crash cluster location. The project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It is expected to improve nearly two lane miles of substandard pavement on the NHS. Signal and geometric improvements included in the project may improve reliability on unreliable NHS segments within the project area and potentially reduce PHED. The project will reconstruct sidewalks to support pedestrian safety and mobility. It is also expected to include bicycle accommodations and to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
603739 | Wrentham (MassDOT)– Construction of Interstate 495/Route 1A Ramps | Complete Streets | Construct ramps at the interchange of Route 1A and Interstate 495 to accommodate increased traffic volumes resulting from nearby development. | Wrentham | 02024 | This project area was studied as part of “Route 1A Corridor Study in Wrentham” (CTPS, 2017). | The project area overlaps two 2017–19 all-mode HSIP crash cluster locations and the project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. The project is expected to reduce vehicle delay and may support reductions of PHED on nearby NHS roadways. It will add sidewalks and bicycle lanes, which may support non-SOV travel. It is also expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
608436 | Ashland–Rehabilitation and Rail Crossing Improvements on Cherry Street | Intersection Improvements | Improve the safety features on Cherry Street and Main Street to establish a Federal Railroad Administration Quiet Zone surrounding the railroad crossings on those two roadways. Install roadway medians, enhance existing railroad crossing signals and gates, reconstruct pavement, construct sidewalks, and improve drainage in the project area. | Ashland | 02025 | N/A | The project is expected to improve safety performance at a railroad crossing location, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. |
608067 | Woburn–Intersection Reconstruction at Route 3 (Cambridge Road) and Bedford Road and South Bedford Street | Intersection Improvements | Reconstruct the intersection and all traffic signal equipment. Enhance roadway geometry to provide exclusive turn lanes for intersection approaches. Reconstruct existing sidewalks, construct new sidewalks, and add bicycle lanes and ADA-compliant bus stops, where feasible. | Woburn | 02025 | N/A | The project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. The project is expected to improve existing sidewalks and add new sidewalks at the intersection, as well as add new bike lanes; all of these features may encourage non-SOV travel. The geometric improvements included in the project are expected to help reduce delay and potentially PHED on nearby NHS routes. The project is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
605857 | Norwood–Intersection Improvements at Route 1 and University Avenue/Everett Street | Intersection Improvements | Upgrade traffic signals and make associated geometric improvements at the intersection of Route 1, University Avenue and Everett Street. Construct an additional travel lane in each direction on Route 1, lengthen left-turn lanes, upgrade pedestrian crossings and bicycle amenities, and rehabilitate sidewalks. | Norwood, Westwood | 2026-2027 | The Route 1 corridor in Norwood is identified as a priority bottleneck in the Destination 2040 Needs Assessment. This location was studied in “Route 1 at Everett Street and University Avenue” (CTPS, 2014). | The project area overlaps a 2017–19 all-mode HSIP crash cluster location and the project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It is expected to improve nearly three lane miles of pavement on the NHS. Signal and geometric improvements included in the project may improve reliability on unreliable NHS segments within the project area and potentially reduce PHED. The project will improve substandard sidewalks and add new sidewalks and bicycle accommodations, all of which may encourage non-SOV travel. It is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
608940 | Weston–Intersection Improvements at Boston Post Road (Route 20) at Wellesley Street | Intersection Improvements | Address safety, congestion, and connectivity concerns at the intersection of Route 20, Boston Post Road, and Wellesley Street by installing a new signal system, implementing geometric improvements, replacing and adding sidewalks, and adding bicycle lanes. | Weston | 02026 | This project intersects a priority bottleneck location identified in the Destination 2040 Needs Assessment. | The project area overlaps a 2017–19 all-mode HSIP crash cluster location and the project is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. Signal and geometric improvements included in the project may improve reliability on unreliable NHS segments within the project area and potentially reduce PHED. The project will improve and add sidewalks and add bicycle lanes; these features may encourage non-SOV travel. It is expected to reduce CO2 and other transportation-related emissions. |
607981 | Somerville–McGrath Boulevard Reconstruction | Major Infrastructure: Roadway | Remove the existing McCarthy Viaduct and replace it with an at-grade urban boulevard. Rationalize intersections, improve signalization, and create off-street pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Improve bus operations by installing floating/in-lane bus stops, transit signal priority, and bus queue-jump lanes at key intersections. | Somerville | 2027-2028 | This project is included in Destination 2040, the MPO’s LRTP. This project changes network capacity and is considered regionally significant for air quality modeling. | The project area overlaps a 2017–19 all-mode HSIP crash cluster location, a 2010–19 HSIP pedestrian crash cluster location, and a 2010–19 HSIP bicycle crash cluster location. It is expected to improve safety performance, including for bicyclists and pedestrians. It will improve one NHS bridge and improve more than four lane miles of substandard pavement on the NHS. The geometric and signal improvements included in the project may reduce PHED and improve reliability on this portion of the NHS network. The project will improve bus operations and amenities, reconstruct and reconfigure sidewalks, and add off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities; these features are expected to increase non-SOV travel. It was analyzed as part of a set of recommended LRTP projects, and MPO staff estimate that this set will decrease CO2 emissions in the region compared to a no-build scenario. |
613088 | MALDEN - SPOT POND BROOK GREENWAY | Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections | The Spot Pond Brook Greenway is a proposed shared-use path connecting Malden's Oak Grove neighborhood with the Northern Strand Community Trail and Malden River via downtown Malden. The 1.1 mile, 11 foot wide shared-use path will replace existing sidewalk infrastructure and narrow roadway widths to accommodate the new bicycle/pedestrian facility on existing right-of-way. The project will also install wayfinding signage on existing roadway facilities to connect the northern terminus of the path at Coytemore Lea Park with the Oak Grove MBTA station. | MALDEN | 02027 | This project includes sections of the Mystic Highlands Greenway, a regional trail connection initiative. | This project includes a 2017-19 bicycle HSIP crash cluster location and will improve the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians throughout the project area. The project will also improve connectivity to MBTA bus and rail transit facilities. |
610691 | NATICK- COCHITUATE RAIL TRAIL EXTENSION, FROM MBTA STATION TO MECHANIC STREET | Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections | Construction of a shared-use bridge to connect the Cochituate Rail Trail to Route 27. Improvements to multimodal connectivity at Natick Center commuter rail station. Project would be the final extension of the Cochituate Rail Trail. | NATICK | 02028 | This project finalizes the Cochituate Rail Trail with a direct connection into a new MBTA Natick Center Commuter Rail Station. The development of the project coordinated with the MBTA and with MassDOT, which at the time of project evaluation was implementing additional bicycle network enhancements as part of its Route 27 reconstruction. | This project constructs a new grade-separated facility as part of the Cochituate Rail Trail to establish safe pedestriana nd bicycle connections between MBTA Commuter Rail facilities and downtown Natick into the Cochituate Rail Trail. |
608158 | WESTWOOD- NORWOOD- RECONSTRUCTION OF CANTON STREET TO UNIVERSITY DRIVE, INCLUDING REHAB OF N-25-032=W-31-018 | Complete Streets | The project will install new pedestrian sidewalks on the west side of the roadway and a shared-use path on the east side of the roadway. These facilities are being constructed where no dedicated facilities currently exist to improve multimodal accessibility to area residences, employment centers, and open space. Bridge N25032 will be replaced for improved multimodal access and freight rail clearance beneath. The project improves roadway geometry for all vehicles, including visibility improvements on five curves for stopping sight distance, the addition of truck apron turn lanes, and median installation. High-visibility crosswalks and rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) will be added in seven locations. New medians will function as pedestrian refuges. New or relocated street lighting will be mounted on utility poles. Reflective signing and markers will be improved. | WESTWOOD | 02027 | N/A | This project replaces the deck of an NHS bridge structure and improves the clearance of the superstructure to facilitate freight movement. The project creates safe pedestrian and bicycle facilities along Canton Street, which lacks any facilities at the time of project programming. These multimodal facilities improve access to nearby transit facilities at the Route 128 / University Park MBTA and Amtrak station. |
612989 | BOSTON- BRIDGE PRESERVATION, B-16-066 (38D), CAMBRIDGE STREET OVER MBTA | Complete Streets | Replace superstructure of a major bridge over the MBTA Orange Line, commuter rail, Amtrak lines, and Interstate 93. Pursue state-of-good-repair investments to avoid closures and limit impacts to nearby projects (for example, projects on Mystic Avenue, Maffa Way, Rutherford Avenue, and McGrath Highway). Enhance multimodal accessibility for a key link to Sullivan Square MBTA station, including expanding bus facility access. | BOSTON | 02026 | This project is consistent with the City of Boston's Sullivan Square Design Project. | This project replaces the deck and superstructure of an NHS bridge structure over MBTA, Amtrak, and freight rail and beneath Interstate 93. The new bridge will support a westbound bus lane to facilitate improved transit connectivity between Boston's Charlestown neighborhood and Somerville. |
613145 | WAKEFIELD- COMPREHENSIVE DOWNTOWN MAIN STREET RECONSTRUCTION | Complete Streets | Complete Streets enhancements to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety along a major local economic generator. Traffic signal upgrade at the intersection of Church and Salem Streets with geometry adjustments to improve turn radii and reduce emergency response times. Pedestrian signal upgrades, new crosswalks, pedestrian refuge islands, installation of a shared-use-path, and new pedestrian lighting. Partial closure of Common Street to thru-traffic to improve pedestrian accessibility for Upper and Lower Common open space. | WAKEFIELD | 02028 | This project includes sections of the Mystic Highlands Greenway, a regional trail connection initiative. | This project implements complete streets enhancements and traffic calming measures along a section of NHS roadway to complement investments in transit-oriented-development in Wakefield. These investments are also part of a larger regional investment in trails and bicycle paths for the Mystic Highlands Greenway, and the project provides for connectivity into the future Wakefield-Lynnfield Rail Trail. |
S12807 | MWRTA CATCHCONNECT MICTROTRANSIT SERVICE EXPANSION PHASE 2 | Community Connections | Expansion of the CatchConnect microtransit program within the municipalities of Framingham and Natick on weeknights during evening hours. CatchConnect would be available within these communities between approximately 7:30 PM and 10:30 PM Monday through Friday, providing a supplemental public transportation resource following the conclusion of traditional fixed-route service. | MWRTA | 2024-2026 | Expansion of microtransit services in underserved transit areas is highlighted in the MPO's Coordinated Public Transit and Human Services Transportation (HST) Plan. CTPS has also conducted studies regarding MicroTransit with favorable recommendations for MWRTA in the past. | This project will reduce CO2 emissions by reducing SOV travel by providing for expanded service hours and area for microtransit. |
S12802 | LYNN- BROAD STREET CORRIDOR TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY | Community Connections | Upgrade traffic signal equipment at seven signalized intersections to improve safety and efficiency for all modes of transportation along one of the busiest corridors in Lynn. | LYNN | 02024 | Destination 2040 cites Downtown Lynn as a priority area for reducing pedestrian crash-cluster incidents (Page 4). Parts of Broad Street are included in the ongoing MBTA North Shore Busway Study, programmed in FFY 2023 of the UPWP. | This project will reduce SOV travel and CO2 emissions by making transit improvements that improve the reliability and operability of multiple MBTA bus routes along a high-priority bus transit corridor in Lynn. |
S12803 | MEDFORD BICYCLE PARKING - TIER 1 | Community Connections | Purchase and install 40 bicycle racks to create 80 additional bicycle parking spaces | MEDFORD | 02024 | Destination 2040 Vision, Goals, and Objectives cities supporting funding bicycle networks with the aim to create a connected network of bicycle facilities to achieve the goal of Capacity Management and Mobility. (Needs Assesment 6-83) | This project implements additional bicycle parking at numerous areas throughout Medford to facilitate active transportation usage at key public spaces and commercial centers. |
S12804 | MEDFORD BLUEBIKES EXPANSION | Community Connections | Purchase and installation of four Bluebikes docks and 25 Bluebikes for the City of Medford’s Bluebikes network | MEDFORD | 02024 | N/A | This project invests in the expansion of the regional bikeshare network, including additional expansion of Medford's Bluebikes facilities to provide for additional connections in MBTA rapid transit facilities. |
S12805 | CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS BIKE PROGRAM | Community Connections | Installation of bidirectional bicycle lanes on Dedham Street. Purchase and installation of bicycle racks at three elementary schools, one middle school, and one high school. | CANTON | 02024 | N/A | This project will reduce CO2 emissions by providing for new bicycle storage facilities for students of Canton's public schools to encourage mode shift and complement additional municipal investments in the bicycle network to provide for safe travel for vulnerable roadway users. |
S12806 | CANTON CENTER BICYCLE RACKS | Community Connections | Purchase and installation of bicycle racks in downtown Canton and at the Canton Center MBTA station. | CANTON | 02024 | Destination 2040 Vision, Goals, and Objectives cities supporting funding bicycle networks with the aim to create a connected network of bicycle facilities to achieve the goal of Capacity Management and Mobility. Bicycle Parking Capacity and Utilization: 2009-10 Inventory, Boston Region MPO/CTPS noted that bicycle parking is provided at both commuter rail stations. At Canton Center the small bicycle parking is at full utilization, while at Canton Junction the large bicycle parking is not utilized. | This project reduces CO2 emissions by adding new bicycle parking facilities at key commuter rail facilities in downtowon Canton to better accomodate intermodal connectivity. |
S12823 | BOSTON ELECTRIC BLUEBIKES ADOPTION | Community Connections | Purchase of 272 electric bikes (e-bikes) and 136 spare batteries for the City of Boston’s Bluebikes network | Boston | 02024 | N/A | This project is part of a larger regional investment in modernizing and expanding the regional Bluebikes bikeshare system and network, in addition to integrating electric vehicles to improve the accessibility and versatility of the network for all users. |
S12824 | CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC BLUEBIKES ADOPTION | Community Connections | Purchase of 90 new e-bikes and 45 spare batteries for the City of Cambridge’s Bluebikes network. | Cambridge | 02024 | N/A | This project is part of a larger regional investment in modernizing and expanding the regional Bluebikes bikeshare system and network, in addition to integrating electric vehicles to improve the accessibility and versatility of the network for all users. |
613121 | EVERETT- TARGETED MULTI-MODAL AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ON ROUTE 16 | Intersection Improvements | This project will make targeted safety enhancements along Route 16 in Everett with a focus on enhanced multimodal accessibility along the corridor. | MassDOT | 02027 | N/A | This project makes specific and targeted investments in multimodal accessibility along a major NHS facility with significant usage for the Inner Core of the region. |
S12818 | ACTON PARKING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | Community Connections | This project will implement digital parking management products to improve the efficiency of permitting and enforcement processes at five commuter parking lots surrounding the MBTA South Acton commuter rail station. These highly utilized lots provide nearly 500 parking spaces. The project will support the transition from a paper-based parking management system to a cloud-based one that will be more convenient for commuters and Acton’s parking management team. | Acton | 02024 | N/A | This project leverages intelligent transportation systems to better utilize and manage the existing capacity of parking facilities in Acton to better connect residents with parking opportunities at Commuter Rail facilities and facilitate mode shift. |
609532 | CHELSEA- TARGETED SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AND RELATED WORK ON BROADWAY, FROM WILLIAMS STREET TO CITY HALL AVENUE | Intersection Improvements | The project will include corridor wide safety improvements targeted at reducing incidents for all users. Standard safety countermeasures such as improved signage, lighting, traffic calming streetscape elements, curb extensions, signal upgrades (where applicable) and other countermeasures may be incorporated. In addition, it is expected that the corridor’s pavement, sidewalks and bus transit amenities will be improved or replaced. | MassDOT | 02025 | N/A | This project is located at a Top 200 crash location and will implement safety improvements for all users of the roadway. The project will reduce CO2 emissions. |
S12819 | JACKSON SQUARE STATION ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS | Transit Modernization | Includes construction of new elevator, modernization of existing elevator, lighting improvements, and various state of good repair improvements to the station. | MBTA | 2024-2025 | This project is part of the MBTA's larger System-Wide Accessibility project portfolio. | This project provides for the maintenance and modernization of existing rapid transit facilities to encourage mode shift and support system reliability for the MBTA's Orange Line. |
S12821 | RAIL TRANSFORMATION - EARLY ACTION ITEMS - READING STATION AND WILBUR INTERLOCKING | Transit Modernization | Addition of a turn track at Reading Station and improvements to the siding at Wilbur Interlocking on the Lowell Line to enable 30 minute headways in the short term and higher frequencies with electrified rolling stock. • Improvements would reduce conflicts with freight and the Amtrak Downeaster while facilitating bus integration. | MBTA | 02024 | This project implements early term action items for a new program in the MBTA's 2024-2028 Capital Investment Plan. | This project maintains commuter rail facilities and provides for additional signal and track improvements to increase the capacity of rail infrastructure. These capacity enhancements allow for reductions in headways and establish a foundation for future electrification efforts for the rail network. |
S12822 | COLUMBUS AVE BUS LANE PHASE II | Transit Modernization | Building on Phase 1, Phase 2 of the project includes bus-only lanes, transit signal priority, improvements to bus stops and shelters along Columbus Ave. and Tremont St., and enhanced pedestrian and bicycle connections. • New project elements include green infrastructure to promote traffic calming and reduce impervious surfaces. | MBTA | 02024 | This project builds upon completed Phase 1 work along Columbus Avenue that was performed by the MBTA and City of Boston. | The project improves bus transit along Columbus Avenue in Boston to provide for rapid and reliable connectivity for bus routes running parralel to the MBTA's Orange Line facilities. This project also establishes connections into those facilities for buses, and improves bicycle and pedestrian safety along the route. |
S12820 | BIKESHARE STATE OF GOOD REPAIR SET-ASIDE | Community Connections | This line item sets aside funding to support Bikeshare investments within the Community Connections program. Example uses of this set-aside include bikeshare system expansion, as well as replacement and upgrades to existing stations. | CTPS | 2025-2028 | This funding implements a recommendation that will be made in the MPO's upcoming LRTP, Destination 2050, regarding the establishment of dedicated funding to support Bikeshare investment throughout the region. | This line item will ensure the maintenance and modernization of existing bikeshare infrastructure within the Boston Region while providing additional funding resources for expansion into neighboring municipalities. |
S12825 | PROJECT DESIGN SUPPORT PILOT | Project Design Support Pilot | Set-aside funding to support the Project Design Support Pilot program, which is planned to launch in the FFY 202529 TIP. | CTPS | 02025 | In tandem with previous MPO discussions, namely the TIP Project Cost Ad Hoc Committee, this line item will empower municipalities to reach the 25% design threshold for projects by allocating additional resources to fund project design. | This line item will ensure the readiness and sustainability of project delivery by providing municipalities with a competitive opportunity to utilize additional resources to fund project design and development. |
Notes: HSIP cluster locations are identified by MassDOT. Substandard pavement and sidewalk designations are based on data provided by MassDOT and project proponents and on MPO assessments conducted for TIP evaluations. The estimated lane miles of substandard NHS pavement improved is based on MPO staff’s assessment of pavement condition in the project area and their assessment of the portion of the project on the NHS. The IRI thresholds used to classify pavement are based on the TIP criteria the MPO adopted in 2020: less than 95 is good, 95 to 170 is fair, and greater than 170 is poor. | |||||||
* The MPO is contributing funds to this project, which is generally funded by MassDOT or the MBTA. | |||||||
AAB = Architectural Access Board. ADA = Americans with Disabilities Act. CO2 = carbon dioxide. CTPS = Central Transportation Planning Staff. FFY = federal fiscal year. HSIP = Highway Safety Improvement Program. IRI = International Roughness Index. MassDOT = Massachusetts Department of Transportation. MBTA = Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. MCRT = Mass Central Rail Trail. MPO = metropolitan planning organization. N/A = not applicable. NHS = National Highway System. PHED = peak hours of excessive delay. SOV = single-occupancy vehicle. TSP = transit signal priority. | |||||||
Source: Boston Region MPO staff. |
Table A-3
FFYs 2024–28 TIP Project Evaluation Results: Multiple MPO Investment Programs
Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections Program | ||||||||||||||||||
Proponent | Project Number | Project Name | MAPC Subregion | Project Status | Project Cost | Cost / Road Mile | Total Score | Total Base Score | Total Scaled Equity Score | Safety | Safety Equity Score | System Preservation and Modernization | System Preservation Equity Score | Capacity Management and Mobility | Capacity Management Equity Score | Clean Air and Sustainable Communities | Clean Air Equity Score | Economic Vitality |
Malden | 613088 | Spot Pond Brook Greenway | ICC | PRC-Approved (12/20/2022) | $3,250,000 | $8,362,573 | 73 | 61 | 12 | 16.5 | 3.6 | 10 | 2.4 | 18 | 5.4 | 5 | 0.6 | 11.5 |
Natick | 610691 | Cochituate Rail Trail Extension | MWRC | 25% Received (11/21/2022) | $6,690,043 | $79,289,399 | 67 | 59 | 8 | 12 | 2 | 11 | 2.2 | 18 | 3.6 | 5 | 0.2 | 13 |
Possible Points | 100 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 5.6 | 14 | 4.8 | 18 | 7.2 | 14 | 2.4 | 14 | ||||||
Complete Streets Program | ||||||||||||||||||
Proponent | Project Number | Project Name | MAPC Subregion | Project Status | Project Cost | Cost / Road Mile | Total Score | Total Base Score | Total Equity Score | Safety | Safety Equity Score | System Preservation and Modernization | System Preservation Equity Score | Capacity Management and Mobility | Capacity Management Equity Score | Clean Air and Sustainable Communities | Clean Air Equity Score | Economic Vitality |
Bellingham | 612963 | Roadway Rehabilitation of Route 126 (Hartford Road) from 800 feet North of the I-495 NB off ramp to Medway T/L (including Bridge B-06-017). | SWAP | PRC-Approved (9/15/2022) | $10,950,000 | $22,383,275 | 51.8 | 46.5 | 5.3 | 13 | 1.55 | 15 | 2.1 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 5 | 0.25 | 6 |
Boston | 612989 | Bridge Preservation, B-16-066 (38D), Cambridge Street Over MBTA | ICC | PRC -Approved (12/21/2022) | $15,400,000 | $0 | 53.1 | 47.25 | 5.9 | 5 | 0.77 | 15 | 1.8 | 12.5 | 2.56 | 4.5 | 0.77 | 10.25 |
Ipswich | 612738 | Argilla Roadway Reconstruction and Adaptation (Crane Estate to Crane Beach) | NSTF | PRC-Approved (5/12/2022) | $5,500,000 | $33,689,095 | 37.1 | 34 | 3.1 | 6 | 0.5 | 14 | 1.3 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.3 | 5 |
Wakefield | 610545 | Envision Wakefield - Main Street Complete Streets Improvements | NSPC | PRC-Approved (12/19/2019) | $16,581,200 | $43,691,354 | 61.8 | 53 | 8.8 | 13 | 2.6 | 13 | 2.7 | 10 | 3.1 | 6 | 0.4 | 11 |
Westwood | 608158 | Reconstruction of Canton Street (East Street Rotary and University Avenue) Including Bridge N25032 | TRIC | 25% Received (2/18/2022) | $19,047,306 | $29,106,536 | 53.3 | 48.25 | 5 | 12 | 1.54 | 14.5 | 1.67 | 9 | 1.54 | 3.75 | 0.25 | 9 |
Possible Points | 100 | 80 | 20 | 18 | 4.6 | 20 | 5.6 | 18 | 7.2 | 12 | 2.6 | 12 | ||||||
Intersection Improvements Program | ||||||||||||||||||
Proponent | Project Number | Project Name | MAPC Subregion | Project Status | Project Cost | Cost / Road Mile | Total Score | Total Base Score | Total Equity Score | Safety | Safety Equity Score | System Preservation and Modernization | System Preservation Equity Score | Capacity Management and Mobility | Capacity Management Equity Score | Clean Air and Sustainable Communities | Clean Air Equity Score | Economic Vitality |
Canton** | N/A | Randolph and York Street Intersection Signalization | TRIC | Pre-PRC | $500,000 | $25,882,353 | N/A* | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Possible Points | 100 | 80 | 20 | 21 | 5.4 | 17 | 5.4 | 18 | 6.8 | 12 | 2.4 | 12 | ||||||
*This project was not recommended for moving forward at TIP Readiness Days until the project is formally intiated through MassDOT's system and goes through the Project Review Committee. Staff are actively working with the project proponent and MassDOT District 6 to initiate this project. | ||||||||||||||||||
Abbreviations | ||||||||||||||||||
MWRTA = MetroWest Regional Transit Authority. N/A = not applicable. PRC = MassDOT's Project Review Committee. | ||||||||||||||||||
Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) Subregions: ICC = Inner Core Committee. MAGIC = Minuteman Advisory Group on Interlocal Coordination. MWRC = MetroWest Regional Collaborative. NSPC = North Suburban Planning Council. NSTF = North Shore Task Force. SSC = South Shore Coalition. SWAP = SouthWest Advisory Planning Committee. TRIC = Three Rivers Interlocal Council. |
Table A-4
FFYs 2024–28 TIP Project Evaluation Results: Community Connections Program
Community Connections Program | |||||||||||||||
Proponent | Project Name | MAPC Subregion | Project Cost | Cost/Monthly Passenger Trip | Cost/Point | Total Score | Connectivity | Coordination | Plan Implementation | Transportation Equity | Mode Shift and Demand Projection | Fiscal Sustainability | |||
Concord | Concord Workforce Shuttle* | MAGIC | $369,911 | $155 | $5,210 | 71 | 13 | 15 | 6 | 6 | 21 | 10 | |||
MWRTA | CatchConnect Microtransit Expansion Phase 2* | MWRC | $402,500 | $93 | $4,472 | 90 | 17 | 15 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 10 | |||
North Reading | North Reading Demand Response Shuttle Pilot Program* | NSPC | $77,637 | $348 | $1,005 | 77.25 | 16.25 | 15 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 10 | |||
Revere | Revere On Demand Shuttle Service* | ICC | $980,976 | $30 | $17,210 | 57 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 15 | 10 | |||
Boston | Boston Electric BlueBikes Adoption | ICC | $1,020,000 | $21 | $12,143 | 84 | 17 | 15 | 6 | 12 | 24 | 10 | |||
Cambridge | Cambridge Electric BlueBikes Adoption | ICC | $352,575 | $13 | $4,353 | 81 | 17 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 24 | 10 | |||
Canton | Canton Center Bicycle Racks | TRIC | $10,000 | $12 | $139 | 72 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 6 | 21 | 10 | |||
Canton | Canton Public Schools Bike Program | TRIC | $22,500 | $4 | $592 | 38 | 13 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 10 | |||
Lynn | Broad Street Corridor TSP | ICC | $297,800 | $2 | $3,384 | 88 | 17.5 | 12 | 13.5 | 12 | 23 | 10 | |||
Medford | Medford Bicycle Parking - Tier 1 | ICC | $29,600 | $12 | $352 | 84 | 17 | 12 | 12 | 9 | 24 | 10 | |||
Medford | Medford Bluebikes Expansion | ICC | $118,643 | $53 | $1,521 | 78 | 17 | 15 | 3 | 9 | 24 | 10 | |||
Possible Points | Possible Points | 100 | 18 | 15 | 15 | 18 | 24 | 10 | |||||||
*These shuttle projects requested funding for FFY24 and additional years. Concord requested $139,749 in FFY24, $122,165 in FFY25, and $107,997 in FFY26. The MWRTA requested $140,000 in FFY24, $132,500 in FFY 25, and $107,977 in FFY 26. $130,000 in FFY 26. North Reading requested $41,787 in FFY 24 and $35,850 in FFY 25. Revere requested $356,825 in FFY 24, $338,521 in FFY 25, and $285,630 in FFY 26. The Cost/Monthly Passenger Trip for these projects only shows the cost/monthly user for the first year of funding. | |||||||||||||||
Abbreviations | |||||||||||||||
MWRTA = MetroWest Regional Transit Authority. N/A = not applicable. PRC = MassDOT's Project Review Committee. | |||||||||||||||
Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) Subregions: ICC = Inner Core Committee. MAGIC = Minuteman Advisory Group on Interlocal Coordination. MWRC = MetroWest Regional Collaborative. NSPC = North Suburban Planning Council. NSTF = North Shore Task Force. SSC = South Shore Coalition. SWAP = SouthWest Advisory Planning Committee. TRIC = Three Rivers Interlocal Council. |
Table A-5
FFYs 2024–28 TIP Evaluation Criteria: Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections Program
MPO Goal Area | Safety: Transportation by all modes will be safe. (Up to 20 points) | |||
Criterion | Project improves bicycle safety (up to 5 points) +5 High total effectiveness of bicycle safety improvements +3 Medium total effectiveness of bicycle safety improvements +1 Low total effectiveness of bicycle safety improvements +0 Project does not implement bicycle safety improvements |
Project improves pedestrian safety (up to 5 points) +5 High total effectiveness of pedestrian safety improvements +3 Medium total effectiveness of pedestrian safety improvements +1 Low total effectiveness of pedestrian safety improvements +0 Project does not implement pedestrian safety improvements |
Project improves safety for all users (up to 3 points) +3 Project includes three or more eligible multimodal safety improvements +2 Project includes two eligible multimodal safety improvements +1 Project includes one eligible multimodal safety improvement +0 Project does not include any eligible multimodal safety improvements |
|
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | Bonus (up to 2 points) +2 Improves bicycle safety at bicycle HSIP cluster |
Bonus (up to 2 points) +2 Improves pedestrian safety at pedestrian HSIP cluster |
Bonus (up to 3 points) +3 Addresses safety at multiple all-mode HSIP clusters OR a top-200 crash location +2 Addresses safety at one all-mode HSIP cluster |
|
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | Yes | No | |
MPO Goal Area | System Preservation: Maintain and modernize the transportation system and plan for its resiliency. (Up to 14 points) | |||
Criterion | Project incorporates resiliency elements into its design (up to 5 points) +1 Project implements recommendation(s) as identified in a Hazard Mitigation Plan, Municipal Vulnerability Plan, or climate adaptation plan ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project improves stormwater infrastructure ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project implements innovative resiliency solutions ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project designed to meet a range of future climate projections ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project demonstrates regional coordination on resiliency |
Project improves connectivity to critical facilities (up to 2 points) +2 Project improves access to critical facilities |
Project improves existing pedestrian facilities (up to 5 points) +5 Existing pedestrian facilities are in poor condition and improvements are included in the project +3 Existing pedestrian facilities are in fair condition and improvements are included in the project +1 Existing pedestrian facilities are in good condition and improvements are included in the project +0 Project does not improve existing pedestrian facilities |
Project improves other existing assets (up to 2 points) +2 Project improves three or more other assets +1 Project improves one or two other assets +0 Project does not meet or address criteria |
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | Penalty -1 Project is located in an existing or projected flood zone and doesn't specify how the project will address future flooding |
N/A | N/A | N/A |
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
MPO Goal Area | Capacity Management/Mobility: Use existing facility capacity more efficiently and increase healthy transportation options. (Up to 18 points) | |||
Criterion | Project improves pedestrian network and ADA accessibility (up to 5 points) +5 Project adds new shared-use path +3 Project adds new high-quality sidewalks +1 Project adds new standard sidewalks +0 Project does not improve pedestrian network |
Project improves bicycle network (up to 5 points) +5 Project adds new separated bicycle facility (including shared-use paths) +3 Project adds new buffered bicycle facility +1 Project adds new standard bicycle facility +0 Project does not improve bicycle network |
||
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | Bonus (up to 4 points) +4 Project closes a gap in the pedestrian network +3 Project improves ADA accessibility beyond minimum required standards +2 Project creates or improves a pedestrian connection to transit +1 Project extends existing pedestrian network |
Bonus (up to 4 points) +4 Project closes a gap in the bicycle network +2 Project creates or improves a bicycle connection to transit +2 Project extends existing bicycle network +1 Project makes accommodations for bicycle parking or a bicycle share station |
||
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | Yes | ||
MPO Goal Area | Clean Air/Sustainable Communities: Create an environmentally friendly transportation system. (Up to 14 points) | |||
Criterion | Project reduces CO2 (up to 4 points) +4 300 or more annual tons of CO2 reduced +3 100–299 annual tons of CO2 reduced +2 50–99 annual tons of CO2 reduced +1 Less than 50 annual tons of CO2 reduced 0 No expected impact -1 Less than 50 annual tons of CO2 increased -4 50 or more annual tons of CO2 increased |
Project reduces other transportation-related emissions (up to 4 points) +4 1,500 or more total annual kilograms of other emissions reduced +3 750–1499 total annual kilograms of other emissions reduced +2 250–749 total annual kilograms of other emissions reduced +1 Less than 250 total annual kilograms of other emissions reduced 0 No impact -1 Less than 250 total annual kilograms of other emissions increased -4 250 or more total annual kilograms of other emissions increased |
Enhances Natural Environment (up to 4 points) +1 Project improves water quality ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project selects a design alternative that avoids impacts to sensitive natural areas ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project reduces urban heat island effect ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project increases access to parks, open space, or other natural assets |
|
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | N/A | Bonus/Penalty (up to 2 points) +2 Project reduces NOx emissions in area in top 20% of regional NOx levels -2 Project increases NOx emissions in area in top 20% of regional NOx levels |
Penalty -1 Project is anticipated to lead to negative environmental outcomes |
|
Equity Multiplier? | No | Yes | No | |
MPO Goal Area | Economic Vitality: Ensure our transportation network provides a strong foundation for economic vitality. (Up to 14 points) | |||
Criterion | Project serves sites targeted for future development (up to 4 points) +2 Project improves bicycle access to or within a site ------------------------------------------------------------------ +2 Project improves pedestrian access to or within a site |
Project serves existing employment and population centers (up to 4 points) +4 Project mostly serves an existing area of concentrated development +2 Project partly serves an existing area of concentrated development +0 Project does not serve an existing area of concentrated development |
Project demonstrates proponent investment (up to 2 points) +2 20 percent or more of the project cost is provided +1 Less than 20 percent of the project cost is provided +0 No non-TIP funding is provided by the project proponent |
Project promotes access to affordable housing opportunities (up to 3 points) +3 10.4% or more of housing units are affordable in project area +2 6.6-10.3% of housing units are affordable in project area +1 1-6.5% of housing units are affordable in project area +0 Less than 1% of housing units are affordable in project area |
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | N/A | N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project proponent supports design process through pilot project OR robust community outreach process |
N/A |
Equity Multiplier? | No | No | No | No |
Total Base Points Possible | 80 | |||
Total Equity Points Possible | 20 | |||
Total Possible Points | 100 | |||
Table A-6
Evaluation Criteria for FFYs 2024 Community Connections Program
OBJECTIVE | CRITERIA | DATA TO USE | SUBCRITERIA/SCORING |
SCORING CRITERIA (90 possible points) | |||
NETWORK OR CONNECTIVITY VALUE (18 points) | |||
The primary purpose of the Community Connections Program is to close gaps in the transportation network, especially those in the first or last mile between transit and a destination. Projects will be awarded points based on how effectively a proposed project closes different types of gaps and makes travel easier or more efficient. | Connection to existing activity hubs and residential developments (9/6 points) | Application materials, CTPS GIS layers reflecting relevant destinations and employment and population density | Projects can earn points for any combination of conditions, up to the noted overall maximum. Area projects (up to 9 points) 0 If the project area includes* no dense employment concentrations, or dense residential concentrations, or Major Civic Destinations. +2 for each dense employment concentration OR dense residential concentration included in the project area, up to a maximum of 6 points +1 if the project targets a specific dense employment concentration, OR dense residential concentration, or Major Civic Destination +.25 points for each Major Civic Destination included in the project area, up to a maximum of 2 points Point projects (up to 6 points) 0 points if the project has no locations/stops within** ½ mile of a dense employment concentration OR a dense residential concentration +1 point for each location/stop within ½ mile of a dense employment concentration OR a dense residential concentration, up to a maximum of 4 points +2 points for each location/stop within ¼ mile of a dense employment concentration OR a dense residential concentration, up to a maximum of 4 points +.25 points for each location/stop within a ½ mile of a Major Civic Destination, up to a maximum of 1 point +.5 points for each location/stop within a ¼ mile of a Major Civic Destination, up to a maximum of 1 point *A project area includes a dense employment or residential concentration if it contains more than 50% of a transportation analysis zone (TAZ) that meets employment or residential density thresholds **For dense employment or residential concentrations, ”Within” is defined as the location being within the specified distance of the centroid of the relevant TAZs |
Connection to existing transit hubs (6 points) | Application materials, CTPS GIS layers reflecting transit stops and routes | Projects can earn points for any combination of conditions, up to the noted overall maximum. Area Projects (up to 9 points) 0 if the project area does not include any transit stops for any mode +1 for each bus stop with infrequent service in the project area, up to a maximum of 4 points +2 for each commuter rail station in the project area, up to a maximum of 4 points +3 for each bus stop with frequent service in the project area, up to a maximum of 6 points +4 for each rapid transit stop in the project area, up to a maximum of 8 points Point Projects (up to 6 points) 0 If none of the project locations are within 1/2 mile of any transit stations/routes +1 if there is one bus stop with infrequent service within ½ mile of a project location +2 if there are multiple instances of a bus stop with infrequent service within ½ mile of a project location +3 if there is a commuter rail station within ½ mile of a project location +4 if there is a bus stop with frequent service within ¼ mile of a project location +5 if there are multiple instances of bus stops with frequent service within ¼ mile of a project location +6 if there is at least one rapid transit stop within ¼ mile of a project location | |
Connection to other transportation infrastructure (6 points) | Application materials, CTPS GIS layers including bicycle infrastructure (derived from MAPC trailmap and other sources) and MassDOT road inventory with enhanced sidewalk data | Area Projects (not eligible for points in this subcriterion) n/a Point Projects (up to 6 points) 0 if none of the project locations are within 250 feet of sidewalks or protected bicycle infrastructure +1 for each project location within 250 feet of a sidewalk, up to a maximum of 2 points +1 for each project location within 250 feet of protected bicycle infrastructure, up to a maximum of 2 points +2 if any project location is within 250 feet of BOTH a sidewalk and protected bicycle infrastructure | |
Coordination or cooperation between multiple entities (15 points) | |||
The MPO prioritizes collaboration among different entities in the transportation planning process. Cooperative project planning and execution is particularly important for first-mile and last-mile connections of the type that the Community Connections Program is intended to facilitate. The cooperation can involve actors from both the public and private sectors. | Number of collaborating entities (15 points) | Application materials | +3 for each collaborating entity beyond the sponsor, up to a maximum of 9 points -15 for Bus Lane, TSP, or E-Ink projects that do not have a letter of support from the MBTA Additionally +3 If the project consists of collaborators from multiple sectors (i.e., public and private, or public and nonprofit) +3 If each listed collaborator has provided a formal letter of support to the MPO |
Inclusion in and consistency with local and regional plans (15 points) | |||
A comprehensive planning process is important to ensure that projects occur in an environment of collaboration and careful consideration rather than independently. This criterion proposes to award points based on the extent to which a proposed project has been included in prior plans at both the local and regional levels, and whether it meets the goals of those plans. | Inclusion in local plans (6 points) | Application materials, local plans | Project is scored based on the best condition it meets. +3 if the project supports a theme, idea, or concept in a local comprehensive plan or equivalent document. +6 If the project is specifically included as a need or priority in a local comprehensive plan or equivalent document |
Inclusion in MPO plans (6 points) | Application materials, LRTP Needs Assessment, UPWP Database, MAPC plans | Project earns points for each condition met. +3 If the project is identified as a need in a current or previous LRTP Needs Assessment or another regional plan +3 if the project or a large element thereof is recommended in MPO/MAPC technical studies | |
Inclusion in statewide plans (3 point) | Application materials, LRTP Needs Assessment | +3 If the project is included as a need or priority in MassDOT or other statewide planning studies | |
TRANSPORTATION EQUITY (18 points) | |||
The MPO seeks to prioritize investments that benefit equity populations, while minimizing any burdens associated with MPO-funded projects for these populations. | Serves one or more transportation equity demographics, as identified by the MPO (18 points) | Application materials, CTPS GIS layers | See detailed scoring criteria handout: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YXBvJoj2FM2UJp0qd88Ew_n_KR5OscyS/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=110620465990841651473&rtpof=true&sd=true |
GENERATION OF MODE SHIFT (12 points) | |||
Another primary purpose of the Community Connection Program is to enable modal shift from SOV to transit or other modes. This criterion awards points based on the project’s effectiveness at creating mode shift and/or enabling trips that were previously impossible by non-SOV modes. | Allow new trips that would not be otherwise possible without a car (12 points) | Application materials | This criterion will be scored by MPO staff based on materials and narrative provided in the project application, considering factors such as: •Whether the project competes with or complements existing transit service •If the project brings non-SOV transportation options to an area that previously had few or none •Whether the project provides complementary connections to existing non-SOV transportation services and infrastructure •Whether the project serves a particular, identified transportation purpose that includes or facilitates mode shift •If relevant, whether the project shows it has a viable path to fiscal independence at the end of the MPO grant period •Reliability of projected local or other non-MPO financial contributions •If the project serves a population that travels through the project area but does not live adjacent to or within it •The quality and innovation of the project's marketing plan, when relevant |
DEMAND PROJECTION (12 points) | |||
Gaining an understanding of how many transportation network users a project will reach is crucial for understanding its cost-effectiveness. | Overall demand estimate (6 points) | Application materials | 0 If the application contains no estimates of demand or usage +3 If the application contains estimates of demand or usage, but no documentation of methods used to create them or background information +6 If the application contains estimates of demand or usage that are backed by extensive documentation of methods used to create the estimates and/or other relevant background information |
Staff evaluation of demand estimate (6 points) | Application materials | 0 If staff judge that demand/usage projections are unrealistic or not present +3 if staff judge that demand/usage projections are somewhat realistic +6 If staff judge that demand/usage projections are realistic | |
BUDGET SHEET (10 points) | |||
Quality of information provided (10 points) | Application materials | 0 if there is no budget sheet present or the budget sheet does not contain useful information +5 if the budget sheet is incomplete or inaccurate, but usable with work +10 if the budget sheet is completed with all necessary information | |
Definitions Area projects: Those that are geographically defined as a polygon, rather than delivered at a particular point or points. Examples: microtransit covering an entire town, or an education project for a neighborhood. Point projects: Those that are delivered at a particular point or points and can be geographically defined as such. Examples: bike racks, fixed-route transit (the stops are the points) Population density concentration: any TAZ with more than 4,000 people per square mile. Employment density concentration: any TAZ with more than 4,000 jobs per square mile Frequent service: Follows the MBTA Service Delivery Policy. Stops with frequent service defined are defined in a CTPS layer used in pilot round CC scoring and for the Destination 2040 Needs Assessment. This layer measures frequency at the stop level rather than the route level; that is, a stop with four buses per hour, from two different routes, is considered a frequent stop. | |||
ADA = Americans with Disabilities Act. CMAQ = Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program. CTPS = Central Transportation Planning Staff. FFY = federal fiscal year. GIS = geographic information systems. GTFS = general transit feed specification. LRTP = Long-Range Transportation Plan. MAPC = Metropolitan Area Planning Council. MassDOT = Massachusetts Department of Transportation. MBTA = Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization. MVP = Municipal Vulnerability Program. SOV = single occupancy vehicle. TAD = Traffic and Design. TAZ = transportation analysis zone. TIP = Transportation Improvement Program. |
Table A-7
FFYs 2024–28 TIP Evaluation Criteria: Complete Streets Program
MPO Goal Area | Safety: Transportation by all modes will be safe. (Up to 18 points) | |||||||
Criterion | Project addresses severe-crash location (up to 3 points) +3 EPDO value of 1000 or more +2 EPDO value of 250 to 999 +1 EPDO value of less than 250 +0 No EPDO value |
Project addresses high-crash location (up to 3 points) +3 Crash rate of 6.45 or greater +2 Crash rate between 4.25 and 6.45 +1 Crash rate between 2.05 and 4.25 +0 Crash rate below 2.05 |
Project addresses truck-related safety issue (up to 2 points) +2 High total effectiveness of truck safety improvements +1 Medium total effectiveness of truck safety improvements +0 Low total effectiveness or no implementation of truck safety improvements |
Project improves bicycle safety (up to 2 points) +2 High total effectiveness of bicycle safety improvements +1 Medium total effectiveness of bicycle safety improvements +0 Low total effectiveness or no inclusion of bicycle safety improvements |
Project improves pedestrian safety (up to 2 points) +2 High total effectiveness of pedestrian safety improvements +1 Medium total effectiveness of pedestrian safety improvements +0 Low total effectiveness or no inclusion of pedestrian safety improvements |
Project improves safety for all users (up to 2 points) +2 Project includes three or more eligible multimodal safety improvements +1 Project includes one or two eligible multimodal safety improvements +0 Project does not include any eligible multimodal safety improvements |
||
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Improves bicycle safety at bicycle HSIP cluster |
Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Improves pedestrian safety at pedestrian HSIP cluster |
Bonus (up to 2 points) +2 Addresses safety at multiple all-mode HSIP clusters OR a top-200 crash location +1 Addresses safety at one all-mode HSIP cluster |
||
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | ||
MPO Goal Area | System Preservation: Maintain and modernize the transportation system and plan for its resiliency. (Up to 20 points) | |||||||
Criterion | Project incorporates resiliency elements into its design (up to 5 points) +1 Project implements recommendation(s) as identified in a Hazard Mitigation Plan, Municipal Vulnerability Plan, or climate adaptation plan ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project improves stormwater infrastructure ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project implements innovative resiliency solutions ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project designed to meet a range of future climate projections ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project demonstrates regional coordination on resiliency |
Improves evacuation route (up to 1 point) +1 Project improves an evacuation route, diversion route, or alternate diversion route |
Improves connectivity to critical facilities (up to 1 point) +1 Project improves access to critical facilities |
Project improves existing transit assets (up to 2 points) +2 Project makes significant improvements to existing transit assets +1 Project makes moderate improvements to existing transit assets +0 Project does not modernize or improve the condition of existing transit assets |
Project improves existing pedestrian facilities (up to 3 points) +3 Existing pedestrian facilities are in poor condition and improvements are included in the project +2 Existing pedestrian facilities are in fair condition and improvements are included in the project +1 Existing pedestrian facilities are in good condition and improvements are included in the project +0 Project does not improve existing pedestrian facilities |
Project improves existing bridges (up to 2 points) +2 Project improves existing bridge(s) from poor to good condition through rehabilitation or replacement +1 Project improves existing bridge(s) from fair to good condition through rehabilitation or replacement 0 Project does not include bridge improvements |
Project improves existing pavement condition (up to 2 points) +2 Current roadway condition is poor and pavement improvements are included in the project +1 Current roadway condition is fair and pavement improvements are included in the project +0 Current roadway condition is good |
Project improves other existing assets (up to 2 points) +2 Project improves three or more other assets +1 Project improves one or two other assets +0 Project does not meet or address criteria |
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | Penalty -1 Project is located in an existing or projected flood zone and doesn't specify how the project will address future flooding |
N/A | N/A | N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project reduces or removes vehicle weight/height restrictions OR improves bridge on a key roadway |
Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project improves pavement on a key corridor OR improves roadway substructure |
N/A | |
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
MPO Goal Area | Capacity Management/Mobility: Use existing facility capacity more efficiently and increase healthy transportation options. (Up to 18 points) | |||||||
Criterion | Project reduces transit passenger delay (up to 3 points) +3 Project results in significant passenger delay reductions +2 Project results in moderate passenger delay reductions +1 Project results in limited passenger delay reductions +0 Project does not make meaningful reductions in passenger delay |
Project invests in New Transit Assets (up to 2 points) +2 Project makes significant investments in new transit assets +1 Project makes moderate investments in new transit assets +0 Project does not invest in new transit assets |
Project improves pedestrian network and ADA accessibility (up to 3 points) +3 Project adds new sidewalks on high-utility link +2 Project adds new sidewalks on medium-utility link +1 Project adds new sidewalks on low-utility link +0 Project does not improve pedestrian network |
Project improves bicycle network (up to 3 points) +3 Project adds new separated bicycle facility (including shared-use paths) +2 Project adds new buffered bicycle facility +1 Project adds new standard bicycle facility +0 Project does not improve bicycle network |
Project improves truck movement (up to 2 points) +2 Project significantly improves truck movement +1 Project somewhat improves truck movement +0 Project makes minimal improvements to truck movement or does not address criteria |
Project addresses unreliable corridor (up to 1 point) +1 Project addresses a corridor with a level of travel time reliability above 1.25 +0 Project does not meet or address criteria |
||
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | Bonus/Penalty (+/- up to 1 point) +1 Project invests in bus-priority infrastructure on MPO-identified priority corridor -1 Project increases transit vehicle delays or negatively impacts transit vehicle movement |
N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project closes a gap in the pedestrian network +1 Project enhances ADA accessibility beyond minimum required standards +1 Project creates or improves pedestrian connection to transit |
Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project closes a gap in the bicycle network +1 Project creates or improves a bicycle connection to transit +1 Project makes accommodations for bicycle parking or bicycle share station +1 Project is on a high-utility link |
Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project addresses key freight corridor or makes accommodations for freight deliveries |
N/A | ||
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | ||
MPO Goal Area | Clean Air/Sustainable Communities: Create an environmentally friendly transportation system. (Up to 12 points) | |||||||
Criterion | Project reduces CO2 (up to 3 points) +3 750 or more annual tons of CO2 reduced +2 250-749 annual tons of CO2 reduced +1 Less than 250 annual tons of CO2 reduced 0 No impact -1 Less than 250 annual tons of CO2 increased -3 250 or more annual tons of CO2 increased |
Project reduces other transportation-related emissions (up to 3 points) +3 1,000 or more total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced +2 250-999 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced +1 Less than 250 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced 0 No impact -1 Less than 250 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO increased -3 250 or more total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO increased |
Enhances Natural Environment (up to 4 points) +1 Project improves water quality ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project selects a design alternative that avoids impacts to sensitive natural areas ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project reduces urban heat island effect ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project increases access to parks, open space, or other natural assets |
|||||
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | N/A | Bonus/Penalty (up to 2 points) +2 Project reduces NOx emissions in area in top 20% of regional NOx levels -2 Project increases NOx emissions in area in top 20% of regional NOx levels |
Penalty -1 Project is anticipated to lead to negative environmental outcomes |
|||||
Equity Multiplier? | No | Yes | No | |||||
MPO Goal Area | Economic Vitality: Ensure our transportation network provides a strong foundation for economic vitality. (Up to 12 points) | |||||||
Criterion | Project serves sites targeted for future development (up to 3 points) +1 Project improves bicycle access to or within a site ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project improves pedestrian access to or within a site ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project improves transit access to or within a site |
Project serves existing employment and population centers (up to 3 points) +3 Project mostly serves an existing area of concentrated development +1 Project partly serves an existing area of concentrated development +0 Project does not serve an existing area of concentrated development |
Project demonstrates proponent investment (up to 2 points) +2 20 percent or more of the project cost is provided +1 Less than 20 percent of the project cost is provided +0 No non-TIP funding is provided by the project proponent |
Project promotes access to affordable housing opportunities (up to 3 points) +3 10.4% or more of housing units are affordable in project area +2 6.6-10.3% of housing units are affordable in project area +1 1-6.5% of housing units are affordable in project area +0 Less than 1% of housing units are affordable in project area |
||||
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | N/A | N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project proponent supports design process through pilot project OR robust community outreach process |
N/A | ||||
Equity Multiplier? | No | No | No | No | ||||
Total Base Points Possible | 80 | |||||||
Total Equity Points Possible | 20 | |||||||
Total Possible Points | 100 | |||||||
Table A-8
FFYs 2024–28 TIP Evaluation Criteria: Intersection Improvements Program
MPO Goal Area | Safety: Transportation by all modes will be safe. (Up to 21 points) | ||||||
Criterion | Project addresses severe-crash location (up to 3 points) +3 EPDO value of 300 or more +2 EPDO value of 100 to 299 +1 EPDO value of less than 100 +0 No EPDO value |
Project addresses high-crash location (up to 3 points) Signalized Intersection: +3 Crash rate of 1.69 or greater +2 Crash rate between 1.02 and 1.69 +1 Crash rate between 0.35 and 1.02 +0 Crash rate below 0.35 Unsignalized Intersection: +3 Crash rate of 1.36 or greater +2 Crash rate between 0.78 and 1.36 +1 Crash rate between 0.20 and 0.78 +0 Crash rate below 0.20 |
Project addresses truck-related safety issue (up to 2 points) +2 High total effectiveness of truck safety improvements +1 Medium total effectiveness of truck safety improvements +0 Low total effectiveness or no implementation of truck safety improvements |
Project improves bicycle safety (up to 3 points) +3 High total effectiveness of bicycle safety improvements +2 Medium total effectiveness of bicycle safety improvements +1 Low total effectiveness of bicycle safety improvements +0 Project does not include bicycle safety improvements |
Project improves pedestrian safety (up to 3 points) +3 High total effectiveness of pedestrian safety improvements +2 Medium total effectiveness of pedestrian safety improvements +1 Low total effectiveness of pedestrian safety improvements +0 Project does not include pedestrian safety improvements |
Project improves safety for all users (up to 3 points) +3 Project includes three or more eligible multimodal safety improvements +2 Project includes two eligible multimodal safety improvements +1 Project includes one eligible multimodal safety improvement +0 Project does not include any eligible multimodal safety improvements |
|
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Improves bicycle safety at bicycle HSIP cluster |
Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Improves pedestrian safety at pedestrian HSIP cluster |
Bonus (up to 2 points) +2 Addresses safety at multiple all-mode HSIP clusters OR a top-200 crash location +1 Addresses safety at one all-mode HSIP cluster |
|
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | |
MPO Goal Area | System Preservation: Maintain and modernize the transportation system and plan for its resiliency. (Up to 17 points) | ||||||
Criterion | Project incorporates resiliency elements into its design (up to 5 points) +1 Project implements recommendation(s) as identified in a Hazard Mitigation Plan, Municipal Vulnerability Plan, or climate adaptation plan ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project improves stormwater infrastructure ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project implements innovative resiliency solutions ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project designed to meet a range of future climate projections ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project demonstrates regional coordination on resiliency |
Improves evacuation route (up to 1 point) +1 Project improves an evacuation route, diversion route, or alternate diversion route |
Improves connectivity to critical facilities (up to 1 point) +1 Project improves access to critical facilities |
Project improves existing transit assets (up to 2 points) +2 Project makes significant improvements to existing transit assets +1 Project makes moderate improvements to existing transit assets +0 Project does not modernize or improve the condition of existing transit assets |
Project improves existing pedestrian facilities (up to 3 points) +3 Existing pedestrian facilities are in poor condition and improvements are included in the project +2 Existing pedestrian facilities are in fair condition and improvements are included in the project +1 Existing pedestrian facilities are in good condition and improvements are included in the project +0 Project does not improve existing pedestrian facilities |
Project improves existing pavement condition (up to 2 points) +2 Current roadway condition is poor and pavement improvements are included in the project +1 Current roadway condition is fair and pavement improvements are included in the project +0 Current roadway condition is good |
Project improves other existing assets (up to 2 points) +2 Project improves three or more other assets +1 Project improves one or two other assets +0 Project does not meet or address criteria |
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | Penalty -1 Project is located in an existing or projected flood zone and doesn't specify how the project will address future flooding |
N/A | N/A | N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project improves pavement on a key corridor OR improves roadway substructure |
N/A | |
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
MPO Goal Area | Capacity Management/Mobility: Use existing facility capacity more efficiently and increase healthy transportation options. (Up to 18 points) | ||||||
Criterion | Project reduces transit passenger delay (up to 3 points) +3 Project results in significant passenger delay reductions +2 Project results in moderate passenger delay reductions +1 Project results in limited passenger delay reductions +0 Project does not make meaningful reductions in passenger delay |
Project invests in New Transit Assets (up to 2 points) +2 Project makes significant investments in new transit assets +1 Project makes moderate investments in new transit assets +0 Project does not invest in new transit assets |
Project improves pedestrian network and ADA accessibility (up to 3 points) +3 Project adds new sidewalks on high-utility link +2 Project adds new sidewalks on medium-utility link +1 Project adds new sidewalks on low-utility link +0 Project does not improve pedestrian network |
Project improves bicycle network (up to 3 points) +3 Project adds new separated bicycle facility (including shared-use paths) +2 Project adds new buffered bicycle facility +1 Project adds new standard bicycle facility +0 Project does not improve bicycle network |
Project improves truck movement (up to 2 points) +2 Project significantly improves truck movement +1 Project somewhat improves truck movement +0 Project makes minimal improvements to truck movement or does not address criteria |
Project addresses unreliable corridor (up to 1 point) +1 Project addresses a corridor with a level of travel time reliability above 1.25 +0 Project does not meet or address criteria |
|
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | Bonus/Penalty (+/- up to 1 point) +1 Project invests in bus-priority infrastructure on MPO-identified priority corridor -1 Project increases transit vehicle delays or negatively impacts transit vehicle movement |
N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project closes a gap in the pedestrian network +1 Project enhances ADA accessibility beyond minimum required standards +1 Project creates or improves pedestrian connection to transit |
Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project closes a gap in the bicycle network +1 Project creates or improves a bicycle connection to transit +1 Project makes accommodations for bicycle parking or bicycle share station +1 Project is on a high-utility link |
Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project addresses key freight corridor or makes accommodations for freight deliveries |
N/A | |
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | |
MPO Goal Area | Clean Air/Sustainable Communities: Create an environmentally friendly transportation system. (Up to 12 points) | ||||||
Criterion | Project reduces CO2 (up to 3 points) +3 750 or more annual tons of CO2 reduced +2 250-749 annual tons of CO2 reduced +1 Less than 250 annual tons of CO2 reduced 0 No impact -1 Less than 250 annual tons of CO2 increased -3 250 or more annual tons of CO2 increased |
Project reduces other transportation-related emissions (up to 3 points) +3 1,000 or more total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced +2 250-999 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced +1 Less than 250 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced 0 No impact -1 Less than 250 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO increased -3 250 or more total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO increased |
Enhances Natural Environment (up to 4 points) +1 Project improves water quality ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project selects a design alternative that avoids impacts to sensitive natural areas ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project reduces urban heat island effect ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project increases access to parks, open space, or other natural assets |
||||
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | N/A | Bonus/Penalty (up to 2 points) +2 Project reduces NOx emissions in area in top 20% of regional NOx levels -2 Project increases NOx emissions in area in top 20% of regional NOx levels |
Penalty -1 Project is anticipated to lead to negative environmental outcomes |
||||
Equity Multiplier? | No | Yes | No | ||||
MPO Goal Area | Economic Vitality: Ensure our transportation network provides a strong foundation for economic vitality. (Up to 12 points) | ||||||
Criterion | Project serves sites targeted for future development (up to 3 points) +1 Project improves bicycle access to or within a site ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project improves pedestrian access to or within a site ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project improves transit access to or within a site |
Project serves existing employment and population centers (up to 3 points) +3 Project mostly serves an existing area of concentrated development +1 Project partly serves an existing area of concentrated development +0 Project does not serve an existing area of concentrated development |
Project demonstrates proponent investment (up to 2 points) +2 20 percent or more of the project cost is provided +1 Less than 20 percent of the project cost is provided +0 No non-TIP funding is provided by the project proponent |
Project promotes access to affordable housing opportunities (up to 3 points) +3 10.4% or more of housing units are affordable in project area +2 6.6-10.3% of housing units are affordable in project area +1 1-6.5% of housing units are affordable in project area +0 Less than 1% of housing units are affordable in project area |
|||
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | N/A | N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project proponent supports design process through pilot project OR robust community outreach process |
N/A | |||
Equity Multiplier? | No | No | No | No | |||
Total Base Points Possible | 80 | ||||||
Total Equity Points Possible | 20 | ||||||
Total Possible Points | 100 | ||||||
Table A-9
FFYs 2024–28 TIP Evaluation Criteria: Major Infrastructure Program
MPO Goal Area | Safety: Transportation by all modes will be safe. (Up to 18 points) | |||||||
Criterion | Project addresses severe-crash location (up to 3 points) +3 EPDO value of 1000 or more +2 EPDO value of 250 to 999 +1 EPDO value of less than 250 +0 No EPDO value |
Project addresses high-crash location (up to 3 points) For corridor projects: +3 Crash rate of 6.45 or greater +2 Crash rate between 4.25 and 6.45 +1 Crash rate between 2.05 and 4.25 +0 Crash rate below 2.05 ------------------------------------------------------------------ For intersection and interchange projects: Signalized Intersection: +3 Crash rate of 1.69 or greater +2 Crash rate between 1.02 and 1.69 +1 Crash rate between 0.35 and 1.02 +0 Crash rate below 0.35 Unsignalized Intersection: +3 Crash rate of 1.36 or greater +2 Crash rate between 0.78 and 1.36 +1 Crash rate between 0.20 and 0.78 +0 Crash rate below 0.20 |
Project addresses truck-related safety issue (up to 2 points) +2 High total effectiveness of truck safety improvements +1 Medium total effectiveness of truck safety improvements +0 Low total effectiveness or no implementation of truck safety improvements |
Project improves bicycle safety (up to 2 points) +2 High total effectiveness of bicycle safety improvements +1 Medium total effectiveness of bicycle safety improvements +0 Low total effectiveness or no inclusion of bicycle safety improvements |
Project improves pedestrian safety (up to 2 points) +2 High total effectiveness of pedestrian safety improvements +1 Medium total effectiveness of pedestrian safety improvements +0 Low total effectiveness or no inclusion of pedestrian safety improvements |
Project improves safety for all users (up to 2 points) +2 Project includes three or more eligible multimodal safety improvements +1 Project includes one or two eligible multimodal safety improvements +0 Project does not include any eligible multimodal safety improvements |
||
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Improves bicycle safety at bicycle HSIP cluster |
Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Improves pedestrian safety at pedestrian HSIP cluster |
Bonus (up to 2 points) +2 Addresses safety at multiple all-mode HSIP clusters OR a top-200 crash location +1 Addresses safety at one all-mode HSIP cluster |
||
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | ||
MPO Goal Area | System Preservation: Maintain and modernize the transportation system and plan for its resiliency. (Up to 20 points) | |||||||
Criterion | Project incorporates resiliency elements into its design (up to 5 points) +1 Project implements recommendation(s) as identified in a Hazard Mitigation Plan, Municipal Vulnerability Plan, or climate adaptation plan ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project improves stormwater infrastructure ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project implements innovative resiliency solutions ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project designed to meet a range of future climate projections ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project demonstrates regional coordination on resiliency |
Improves evacuation route (up to 1 point) +1 Project improves an evacuation route, diversion route, or alternate diversion route |
Improves connectivity to critical facilities (up to 1 point) +1 Project improves access to critical facilities |
Project improves existing transit assets (up to 2 points) +2 Project makes significant improvements to existing transit assets +1 Project makes moderate improvements to existing transit assets +0 Project does not modernize or improve the condition of existing transit assets |
Project improves existing pedestrian facilities (up to 3 points) +3 Existing pedestrian facilities are in poor condition and improvements are included in the project +2 Existing pedestrian facilities are in fair condition and improvements are included in the project +1 Existing pedestrian facilities are in good condition and improvements are included in the project +0 Project does not improve existing pedestrian facilities |
Project improves existing bridges (up to 2 points) +2 Project improves existing bridge(s) from poor to good condition through rehabilitation or replacement +1 Project improves existing bridge(s) from fair to good condition through rehabilitation or replacement 0 Project does not include bridge improvements |
Project improves existing pavement condition (up to 2 points) +2 Current roadway condition is poor and pavement improvements are included in the project +1 Current roadway condition is fair and pavement improvements are included in the project +0 Current roadway condition is good |
Project improves other existing assets (up to 2 points) +2 Project improves three or more other assets +1 Project improves one or two other assets +0 Project does not meet or address criteria |
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | Penalty -1 Project is located in an existing or projected flood zone and doesn't specify how the project will address future flooding |
N/A | N/A | N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project reduces or removes vehicle weight/height restrictions OR improves bridge on a key roadway |
Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project improves pavement on a key corridor OR improves roadway substructure |
N/A | |
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
MPO Goal Area | Capacity Management/Mobility: Use existing facility capacity more efficiently and increase healthy transportation options. (Up to 18 points) | |||||||
Criterion | Project reduces transit passenger delay (up to 3 points) +3 Project results in significant passenger delay reductions +2 Project results in moderate passenger delay reductions +1 Project results in limited passenger delay reductions +0 Project does not make meaningful reductions in passenger delay |
Project invests in New Transit Assets (up to 2 points) +2 Project makes significant investments in new transit assets +1 Project makes moderate investments in new transit assets +0 Project does not invest in new transit assets |
Project improves pedestrian network and ADA accessibility (up to 3 points) +3 Project adds new sidewalks on high-utility link +2 Project adds new sidewalks on medium-utility link +1 Project adds new sidewalks on low-utility link +0 Project does not improve pedestrian network |
Project improves bicycle network (up to 3 points) +3 Project adds new separated bicycle facility (including shared-use paths) +2 Project adds new buffered bicycle facility +1 Project adds new standard bicycle facility +0 Project does not improve bicycle network |
Project improves truck movement (up to 2 points) +2 Project significantly improves truck movement +1 Project somewhat improves truck movement +0 Project makes minimal improvements to truck movement or does not address criteria |
Project addresses unreliable corridor (up to 1 point) +1 Project addresses a corridor with a level of travel time reliability above 1.25 +0 Project does not meet or address criteria |
||
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | Bonus/Penalty (+/- up to 1 point) +1 Project invests in bus-priority infrastructure on MPO-identified priority corridor -1 Project increases transit vehicle delays or negatively impacts transit vehicle movement |
N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project closes a gap in the pedestrian network +1 Project enhances ADA accessibility beyond minimum required standards +1 Project creates or improves pedestrian connection to transit |
Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project closes a gap in the bicycle network +1 Project creates or improves a bicycle connection to transit +1 Project makes accommodations for bicycle parking or bicycle share station +1 Project is on a high-utility link |
Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project addresses key freight corridor or makes accommodations for freight deliveries |
N/A | ||
Equity Multiplier? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | ||
MPO Goal Area | Clean Air/Sustainable Communities: Create an environmentally friendly transportation system. (Up to 12 points) | |||||||
Criterion | Project reduces CO2 (up to 3 points) +3 750 or more annual tons of CO2 reduced +2 250-749 annual tons of CO2 reduced +1 Less than 250 annual tons of CO2 reduced 0 No impact -1 Less than 250 annual tons of CO2 increased -3 250 or more annual tons of CO2 increased |
Project reduces other transportation-related emissions (up to 3 points) +3 1,000 or more total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced +2 250-999 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced +1 Less than 250 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced 0 No impact -1 Less than 250 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO increased -3 250 or more total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO increased |
Enhances Natural Environment (up to 4 points) +1 Project improves water quality ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project selects a design alternative that avoids impacts to sensitive natural areas ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project reduces urban heat island effect ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project increases access to parks, open space, or other natural assets |
|||||
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | N/A | Bonus/Penalty (up to 2 points) +2 Project reduces NOx emissions in area in top 20% of regional NOx levels -2 Project increases NOx emissions in area in top 20% of regional NOx levels |
Penalty -1 Project is anticipated to lead to negative environmental outcomes |
|||||
Equity Multiplier? | No | Yes | No | |||||
MPO Goal Area | Economic Vitality: Ensure our transportation network provides a strong foundation for economic vitality. (Up to 12 points) | |||||||
Criterion | Project serves sites targeted for future development (up to 3 points) +1 Project improves bicycle access to or within a site ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project improves pedestrian access to or within a site ------------------------------------------------------------------ +1 Project improves transit access to or within a site |
Project serves existing employment and population centers (up to 3 points) +3 Project mostly serves an existing area of concentrated development +1 Project partly serves an existing area of concentrated development +0 Project does not serve an existing area of concentrated development |
Project demonstrates proponent investment (up to 2 points) +2 20 percent or more of the project cost is provided +1 Less than 20 percent of the project cost is provided +0 No non-TIP funding is provided by the project proponent |
Project promotes access to affordable housing opportunities (up to 3 points) +3 10.4% or more of housing units are affordable in project area +2 6.6-10.3% of housing units are affordable in project area +1 1-6.5% of housing units are affordable in project area +0 Less than 1% of housing units are affordable in project area |
||||
Bonus/Penalty (if applicable) | N/A | N/A | Bonus (up to 1 point) +1 Project proponent supports design process through pilot project OR robust community outreach process |
N/A | ||||
Equity Multiplier? | No | No | No | No | ||||
Total Base Points Possible | 80 | |||||||
Total Equity Points Possible | 20 | |||||||
Total Possible Points | 100 | |||||||
Table A-10
Evaluation Criteria for FFYs 2021-25 TIP and Prior TIP Cycles (Archived)
OBJECTIVES | CRITERIA | SUBCRITERIA/SCORING |
SAFETY: Transportation by all modes will be safe. | ||
Reduce the number and severity of crashes and safety incidents for all modes Reduce serious injuries and fatalities from transportation Make investments and support initiatives that help protect transportation customers, employees, and the public from safety and security threats | Crash severity value: EPDO index (0–5 points) | +5 EPDO value of 300 or more +4 EPDO value between 200 and 299 +3 EPDO value between 100 and 199 +2 EPDO value between 50 and 99 +1 EPDO value less than 50 +0 No EPDO value |
Crash rate (intersections and corridors) (0–5 points) | Intersection Evaluation Score Signalized Unsignalized +5 ≥ 1.69 ≥ 1.36 +4 1.31–1.69 1.03–1.36 +3 0.93–1.31 0.70–1.03 +2 0.55–0.93 0.37–0.70 +1 0.36–0.55 0.21–0.37 +0 < 0.36 < 0.21 | |
Corridor Interstate Principal Arterials or Other Evaluation Other Freeways Minor Arterials Score Expressways Major–Minor Collectors +5 ≥ 1.81 ≥ 6.45 +4 1.40–1.81 5.35–6.45 +3 1.00–1.40 4.25–5.35 +2 0.59–1.00 3.15– 4.25 +1 0.40–0.59 2.05–3.15 +0 < 0.40 < 2.05 | ||
Improves truck-related safety issue (0–5 points) | +3 High total effectiveness of truck safety countermeasures +2 Medium total effectiveness of truck safety countermeasures +1 Low total effectiveness of truck safety countermeasures +0 Does not implement truck safety countermeasures | |
If project scores points above, then it is eligible for additional points below: +2 Improves truck safety at HSIP Cluster | ||
Improves bicycle safety (0–5 points) | +3 High total effectiveness of bicycle safety countermeasures +2 Medium total effectiveness of bicycle safety countermeasures +1 Low total effectiveness of bicycle safety countermeasures +0 Does not implement bicycle safety countermeasures | |
If project scores points above, then it is eligible for additional points below: +2 Improves bicycle safety at HSIP Bicycle Cluster +1 Improves bicycle safety at HSIP Cluster | ||
Improves pedestrian safety (0–5 points) | +3 High total effectiveness of pedestrian safety countermeasures +2 Medium total effectiveness of pedestrian safety countermeasures +1 Low total effectiveness of pedestrian safety countermeasures +0 Does not implement pedestrian safety countermeasures | |
If project scores points above, then it is eligible for additional points below: +2 Improves pedestrian safety at HSIP Pedestrian Cluster +1 Improves pedestrian safety at HSIP Cluster | ||
Improves safety or removes an at-grade railroad crossing (0–5 points) | +5 Removes an at-grade railroad crossing +3 Significantly improves safety at an at-grade railroad crossing +1 Improves safety at an at-grade railroad crossing +0 Does not include a railroad crossing | |
SAFETY (30 possible points) | ||
SYSTEM PRESERVATION AND MODERNIZATION: Maintain and modernize the transportation system and plan for its resiliency. | ||
Maintain the transportation system, including roadway, transit, and active transportation infrastructure, in a state of good repair Modernize transportation infrastructure across all modes Prioritize projects that support planned response capability to existing or future extreme conditions (sea level rise, flooding, and other natural and security-related man-made impacts) | Improves substandard roadway bridge(s) (0–3 points) | +3 Condition is structurally deficient and improvements are included in the project +1 Condition is functionally obsolete and improvements are included in the project +0 Does not improve substandard bridge or does not include a bridge |
Improves substandard pavement (0–6 points) | +6 IRI rating greater than 320: Poor condition and pavement improvements are included in the project +4 IRI rating between 320 and 191: Fair condition and pavement improvements are included in the project +0 IRI rating less than 190: Good or better condition | |
Improves substandard traffic signal equipment (0–6 points) | +6 Poor condition and improvements are included in the project +4 Fair condition and improvements are included in the project +0 Does not meet or address criteria | |
Improves transit asset(s) (0–3 points) | +2 Brings transit asset into state of good repair +1 Meets an identified-need in an asset management plan +0 Does not meet or address criteria | |
Improves substandard sidewalk(s) (0–3 points) | +3 Poor condition and sidewalk improvements are included in the project +2 Fair condition and sidewalk improvements are included in the project +0 Sidewalk condition is good or better | |
Improves emergency response (0–2 points) | +1 Project improves an evacuation route, diversion route, or alternate diversion route | |
+1 Project improves an access route to or in proximity to an emergency support location | ||
Improves ability to respond to extreme conditions (0–6 points) | +2 Addresses flooding problem and/or sea level rise and enables facility to function in such a condition | |
+1 Brings facility up to current seismic design standards | ||
+1 Addresses critical transportation infrastructure | ||
+1 Protects freight network elements | ||
+1 Implements hazard mitigation or climate adaptation plans | ||
SYSTEM PRESERVATION AND MODERNIZATION (29 possible points) | ||
CAPACITY MANAGEMENT AND MOBILITY: Use existing facility capacity more efficiently and increase transportation options. | ||
Improve access to and accessibility of all modes, especially transit and active transportation Support roadway management and operations strategies to improve travel reliability, mitigate congestion, and support non-single-occupant-vehicle travel Emphasize capacity management through low-cost investments; prioritize projects that focus on lower-cost operations/ management-type improvements such as intersection improvements, transit priority, and Complete Streets solutions Improve reliability of transit Increase percentage of population and employment within one-quarter mile of transit stations and stops Support community-based and private-initiative services to meet first- and last-mile, reverse commute, and other non-traditional transportation needs, including those of people 75 years old or older and people with disabilities Support strategies to better manage automobile and bicycle parking capacity and usage at transit stations Fund improvements to bicycle and pedestrian networks aimed at creating a connected network of bicycle and accessible sidewalk facilities by expanding existing facilities and closing gaps Increase percentage of population and places of employment with access to facilities on the bicycle network Eliminate bottlenecks on the freight network, improve freight reliability, and enhance freight intermodal connections | Reduces transit vehicle delay (0–4 points) | +3 5 hours or more of daily transit vehicle delay reduced +2 1–5 hours of daily transit vehicle delay reduced +1 Less than one hour of daily transit vehicle delay reduced +0 Does not reduce transit delay |
If project scores points above, then it is eligible for additional points below: |
||
Improves pedestrian network and ADA accessibility (0–5 points) | +2 Adds new sidewalk(s) (including shared-use paths) | |
+2 Improves ADA accessibility | ||
+1 Closes a gap in the pedestrian network | ||
+0 Does not improve pedestrian network | ||
Improves bicycle network (0–4 points) | +3 Adds new physically separated bicycle facility (including shared-use paths) +2 Adds new buffered bicycle facility +1 Adds new standard bicycle facility | |
+1 Closes a gap in the bicycle network +0 Does not improve bicycle network | ||
Improves intermodal accommodations/ connections to transit (0–6 points) | +6 Meets or addresses criteria to a high degree +4 Meets or addresses criteria to a medium degree +2 Meets or addresses criteria to a low degree +0 Does not meet or address criteria | |
Improves truck movement (0–4 points) | +3 Meets or addresses criteria to a high degree +2 Meets or addresses criteria to a medium degree +1 Meets or addresses criteria to a low degree +0 Does not meet or address criteria | |
If project scores points above, then it is eligible for additional points below: +1 Addresses MPO-identified bottleneck location | ||
Reduces vehicle congestion (0–6 points) | +6 400 hours or more of daily vehicle delay reduced +4 100–400 hours of daily vehicle delay reduced +2 Less than 100 hours of daily vehicle delay reduced +0 Does not meet or address criteria | |
CAPACITY MANAGEMENT AND MOBILITY (29 possible points) | ||
CLEAN AIR/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES: Create an environmentally friendly transportation system. | ||
Reduce greenhouse gases generated in the Boston region by all transportation modes Reduce other transportation-related pollutants Minimize negative environmental impacts of the transportation system Support land use policies consistent with smart, healthy, and resilient growth | Reduces CO2 (-5–5 points) | +5 1,000 or more annual tons of CO2 reduced +4 500–999 annual tons of CO2 reduced +3 250–499 annual tons of CO2 reduced +2 100–249 annual tons of CO2 reduced +1 Less than 100 annual tons of CO2 reduced 0 No impact -1 Less than 100 annual tons of CO2 increased |
Reduces other transportation-related emissions (VOC, NOx, CO) (-5–5 points) | +5 2,000 or more total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced +4 1,000–1999 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced +3 500–999 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced +2 250–499 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced +1 Less than 250 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO reduced 0 No impact -1 Less than 250 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO increased -2 250–499 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO increased -3 500–999 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO increased -4 1,000–1999 total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO increased -5 2,000 or more total kilograms of VOC, NOx, CO increased | |
Addresses environmental impacts (0–4 points) | +1 Addresses water quality | |
+1 Addresses cultural resources/open space | ||
+1 Addresses wetlands/resource areas | ||
+1 Addresses wildlife preservation/protected habitats | ||
+0 Does not meet or address criteria | ||
Is in an EOEEA-certified "Green Community" (0–2 points) | +2 Project is located in a “Green Community” +0 Project is not located in a "Green Community" | |
CLEAN AIR/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES (16 possible points) | ||
TRANSPORTATION EQUITY: Ensure that all people receive comparable benefits from, and are not disproportionately burdened by, MPO investments, regardless of race, color, national origin, age, income, ability, or sex. | ||
Prioritize MPO investments that benefit equity populations Minimize potential harmful environmental, health, and safety effects of MPO funded projects for all equity populations Promote investments that support transportation for all ages (age-friendly communities) Promote investments that are accessible to all people regardless of ability | Serves Title VI/non-discrimination populations (-10–12 points) | +2 Serves minority (high concentration) population (>2,000 people) +1 Serves minority (low concentration) population (≤ 2,000 people) |
+2 Serves low-income (high concentration) population (>2,000 people) +1 Serves low-income (low concentration) population (≤ 2,000 people) | ||
+2 Serves limited-English proficiency (high concentration) population (>1,000 people) +1 Serves limited-English proficiency (low concentration) population (≤ 1,000 people) | ||
+2 Serves elderly (high concentration) population (>2,000 people) +1 Serves elderly (low concentration) population (≤ 2,000 people) | ||
+2 Serves zero vehicle households (high concentration) population (>1,000 people) +1 Serves zero vehicle households (low concentration) population (≤ 1,000 people) | ||
+2 Serves persons with disabilities (high concentration) population (>1,000 people) +1 Serves persons with disabilities (low concentration) population (≤ 1,000 people) | ||
+0 Does not serve Title VI or non-discrimination populations -10 Creates a burden for Title VI/non -discrimination populations | ||
TRANSPORTATION EQUITY (12 possible points) | ||
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Ensure our transportation network provides a strong foundation for economic vitality. | ||
Respond to mobility needs of the workforce population Minimize the burden of housing and transportation costs for residents in the region Prioritize transportation investments that serve residential, commercial, and logistics targeted development sites and "Priority Places" identified in the MBTA's Focus 40 plan Prioritize transportation investments consistent with compact-growth strategies of the regional transportation plan | Serves targeted development site (0–6 points) | +2 Provides new transit access to or within site +1 Improves transit access to or within site +1 Provides for bicycle access to or within site +1 Provides for pedestrian access to or within site +1 Provides for improved road access to or within site +0 Does not provide any of the above measures |
Provides for development consistent with the compact growth strategies of MetroFuture (0–5 points) | +2 Mostly serves an existing area of concentrated development +1 Partly serves an existing area of concentrated development +1 Supports local zoning or other regulations that are supportive of smart growth development +2 Complements other local financial or regulatory support that fosters economic revitalization in a manner consistent with smart growth development principles +0 Does not provide any of the above measures | |
Provides multimodal access to an activity center (0–4 points) | +1 Provides transit access (within a quarter mile) to an activity center | |
+1 Provides truck access to an activity center | ||
+1 Provides bicycle access to an activity center | ||
+1 Provides pedestrian access to an activity center | ||
+0 Does not provide multimodal access | ||
Leverages other investments (non-TIP funding) (0–3 points) | +3 Meets or addresses criteria to a high degree (>30 percent of the project cost) +2 Meets or addresses criteria to a medium degree (10–30 percent of the project cost) +1 Meets or addresses criteria to a low degree (< 10 percent of the project cost) +0 Does not meet or address criteria | |
ECONOMIC VITALITY (18 possible points) | ||
TOTAL SCORE (134 possible points) |
Table A-11
FFYs 2021 TIP Community Connections Criteria (Archived)
Key | ||
Blue = Criteria that apply to all projects | ||
Green = Criteria for capital projects | ||
Red/Pink = Criteria for operating projects | ||
OBJECTIVE | CRITERIA | FACTORS |
PROJECT ELIGIBILITY VERIFICATION | ||
Each project funded through this program must show an air quality benefit when analyzed through the MPO’s air quality analysis process. Projects must be ready to begin construction or operation by October 2020. Project sponsors or proponents must demonstrate that they have gained support from stakeholders and have the institutional capacity to carry out the project within the MPO timeframe. | Air Quality Analysis | Projects must pass a spreadsheet-based air quality benefit test based on a variety of data inputs customized to the type of project. |
Proponent's Project Management Capacity | Names, experience, and time commitment of project management staff, as provided by the proponent. | |
GENERAL SCORING CRITERIA (30 possible points) | ||
Network or connectivity value (6 points) | ||
The primary purpose of the Community Connections Program is to close gaps in the transportation network, especially those in the first or last mile between transit and a destination. Projects will be awarded points based on how effectively a proposed project closes different types of gaps and makes travel easier or more efficient. | Connection to existing activity hubs and residential developments (2 points) | Proximity of the project or service to employment, residential, and civic activity hubs, such as dense areas of employment or housing. |
Connection to existing transit hubs (2 points) | Proximity of the project to transit service, with added incentive for connecting to frequent or high-quality service. | |
Connection to other transportation infrastructure (2 points) | Proximity of the project to sidewalk or protected or off-road bicycle infrastructure. | |
Coordination or cooperation between multiple entities (5 points) | ||
The MPO prioritizes collaboration among different entities in the transportation planning process. Cooperative project planning and execution is particularly important for first-mile and last-mile connections of the type that the Community Connections Program is intended to facilitate. The cooperation can involve actors from both the public and private sectors. | Number of collaborating entities (5 points) | Number and variety (judged by sector of origin) of entities collaborating to support the project. |
Inclusion in and consistency with local and regional plans (5 points) | ||
A comprehensive planning process is important to ensure that projects occur in an environment of collaboration and careful consideration rather than independently. This criterion proposes to award points based on the extent to which a proposed project has been included in prior plans at both the local and regional levels, and whether it meets the goals of those plans. | Inclusion in local plans (2 points) | Whether the project is included as a need or priority in a local comprehensive plan. |
Inclusion in MPO plans (2 points) | Whether the project is identified as a need in the LRTP Needs Assessment or recommended in an MPO or MAPC study. | |
Inclusion in statewide plans (1 point) | Whether the project is included as a need or priority in a MassDOT or other statewide study. | |
Transportation equity (5 points) | ||
The MPO seeks to target investments to areas that benefit a high percentage of low-income and minority populations; minimize any burdens associated with MPO-funded projects in low-income and minority areas; and break down barriers to participation in MPO-decision making. | Serves a demographic of transportation equity concern, as identified by the MPO (5 points) | The extent to which the project serves equity populations. |
Generation of mode shift (4 points) | ||
Another primary purpose of the Community Connection Program is to enable modal shift from SOV to transit or other modes. This criterion would award points based on the project’s effectiveness at creating mode shift and/or enabling trips that were previously impossible by non-SOV modes. | Allow new trips that would not be otherwise possible without a car (4 points) | Whether the project adds to overall non-automotive mobility by creating new connections or making trips possible that were not previously, without detracting from or competing with existing transit options. |
Demand projection (4 points) | ||
Gaining an understanding of how many transportation network users a project will reach is crucial for understanding its cost-effectiveness. | Overall demand estimate (2 points) | Presence of demand/usage estimates and quality of analysis used to support them in the application materials. |
Staff evaluation of demand estimate (2 points) | Whether staff judge the demand/usage projections realistic. | |
TYPE-SPECIFIC EVALUATION CRITERIA: CAPITAL PROJECTS (30 points) | ||
SAFETY BENEFITS (12 points) | ||
Bicycle safety (6 points) | ||
Improving safety on the regional transportation network is one of the MPO’s key goals. This criterion would award points to projects that improve safety for the most vulnerable users of the network – people walking and people riding bicycles. An overall score of the effectiveness of bicycle safety countermeasures will be made through professional judgement comparing existing facilities, safety issues, use, and desired/anticipated use to the proposed bicycle safety countermeasures planned to be implemented as part of the project. | Total effectiveness of bicycle safety countermeasures (6 points) | Existing and potential bicyclist usage of the infrastructure and effectiveness of the expected safety improvements. |
Pedestrian safety (6 points) | ||
An overall score of the effectiveness of pedestrian safety countermeasures will be made through professional judgement comparing existing facilities, safety issues, use, and desired/anticipated use to the proposed pedestrian safety countermeasures planned to be implemented as part of the project. | Total effectiveness of pedestrian safety countermeasures (6 points) | Existing and potential pedestrian usage of the infrastructure and effectiveness of the expected safety improvements. |
Lifecycle cost-effectiveness (10 points) | ||
In addition to the initial construction costs, the MPO is concerned that projects funded through the Community Connection Program remain fiscally sustainable after MPO-awarded funding runs out. Projects proposed to the program should be cost-effective compared to potential alternatives, and proponents should demonstrate that local maintenance budgets will be able to accommodate the increased costs of maintaining the project. | Lifecycle Alternatives Analysis (5 Points) | Presence of a cost-effectiveness analysis in the application and whether the analysis is qualitative or quantitative. |
Maintenance budget and plan (5 Points) | Identification of a maintenance plan for the project, including the entity responsible for it and a source of funds. | |
Resilience to weather and environmental hazards (8 points) | ||
Resilience in the face of increasingly destructive storms and weather hazards is a growing concern in the Boston region, and is codified in the MPO’s System Preservation goal. Project proponents should demonstrate that their project will not cause damage to a sensitive ecosystem and that it will be able to resist damage from extreme weather events. | Impact on areas of environmental concern (6 points) | Magnitude of the project's environmental impact, positive or negative. |
Relationship to resilience plans (2 points) | Whether the project is included in local resilience plans. | |
TYPE-SPECIFIC CRITERIA: OPERATIONAL PROJECTS | ||
Long-Term Financial Plan (12 points) | ||
Annual operating costs (2 points) | Whether the estimate of operating costs is present and realistic. | |
Annual maintenance costs (1 point) | Whether the estimate of maintenance costs is present and realistic. | |
All other costs (1 point) | Whether the estimate of other costs is present and realistic. | |
Fare structure (2 points) | Presence of a detailed description of the proposed fare structure and explanation thereof. | |
Plan for fiscal sustainability (6 points) | Whether the application identifies full funding for the project (reflecting a local match to MPO funds) for 0, 1, 2, 3 or more years. | |
Service Plan (10 points) | ||
Service Plan (4 points) | Presence of details on: • Plans for ADA compliance • Frequency and routing of service • How the service plans meet the need of projected riders | |
Operational/contracting plan (4 points) | Presence of details on administrative and/or contracting plans and the background of the operator. | |
Marketing plan (2 points) | Presence of a detailed description of a marketing plan. | |
Performance Monitoring Plan (8 points) | ||
Data management plan (3 points) | Inclusion of plans for data collection, analysis for monitoring service, and sharing the data with the MPO. | |
Passenger survey (2 points) | Whether the application describes plans for a ridership survey and the frequency with which it will be administered. | |
Trip-level boarding counts (1 point) | Presence of plans for trip-level data collection. | |
Stop-level data collection (1 point) | Presence of plans for stop-level data collection. | |
Marketing evaluation (1 point) | Presence of plans for an evaluation of the marketing effort. | |
ADA = Americans with Disabilities Act. CMAQ = Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program. CTPS = Central Transportation Planning Staff. FFY = federal fiscal year. GIS = geographic information systems. GTFS = general transit feed specification. LRTP = Long-Range Transportation Plan. MAPC = Metropolitan Area Planning Council. MassDOT = Massachusetts Department of Transportation. MBTA = Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization. MVP = Municipal Vulnerability Program. SOV = single occupancy vehicle. TAD = Traffic and Design. TAZ = transportation analysis zone. TIP = Transportation Improvement Program. |
The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2008 (GWSA) required statewide reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 25 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2020, and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. As part of the GWSA, the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs developed the Massachusetts Clean Energy and Climate Plan (CECP), which outlined programs to attain the 25 percent reduction by 2020—including a 7.6 percent reduction attributed to the transportation sector.
The Commonwealth’s 13 metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are integrally involved in helping to achieve GHG emissions reductions mandated under the GWSA. The MPOs work closely with the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) and other involved agencies to develop common transportation goals, policies, and projects that will help to reduce GHG emissions levels statewide, and meet the specific requirements of the GWSA regulation, Global Warming Solutions Act Requirements for the Transportation Sector and the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (310 CMR 60.05). The purpose of this regulation is to assist the Commonwealth in achieving its adopted GHG emissions reduction goals by requiring the following:
The Commonwealth’s MPOs are meeting the requirements of this regulation through the transportation goals and policies contained in their LRTPs, the major projects planned in their LRTPs, and the mix of new transportation projects that are programmed and implemented through their TIPs.
The GHG tracking and evaluation processes enable the MPOs and MassDOT to identify the anticipated GHG impacts of the planned and programmed projects, and to use GHG impacts as criteria to prioritize transportation projects. This approach is consistent with the GHG emissions reduction policies that promote healthy transportation modes through prioritizing and programming an appropriate balance of roadway, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian investments, as well as policies that support smart growth development patterns by creating a balanced multimodal transportation system.
MassDOT coordinated with MPOs and regional planning agencies to implement GHG tracking and to evaluate projects during the development of the LRTPs that were adopted in September 2011. This collaboration continued during the development of the LRTPs and amendments adopted in 2016, and for the TIPs produced for federal fiscal years (FFYs) 2016–19, 2017–21, 2018–22, 2019–23, 2020–24, 2021–25, and 2022–26. Working together, MassDOT and the MPOs have attained the following milestones:
In addition to monitoring the GHG impacts of projects in the LRTP that will add capacity to the transportation system, it also is important to monitor and evaluate the GHG impacts of all transportation projects that are programmed in the TIP. The TIP includes both the larger, capacity-adding projects from the LRTP and smaller projects, which are not included in the LRTP but that may affect GHG emissions. The principal objective of this tracking is to enable the MPOs to evaluate the expected GHG impacts of different projects and to use this information as criteria to prioritize and program projects in future TIPs.
In order to monitor and evaluate the GHG impacts of TIP projects, MassDOT and the MPOs have developed approaches for identifying anticipated GHG emissions impacts of different types of projects. Since carbon dioxide (CO2 ) is the largest component of GHG emissions overall and is the focus of regulation 310 CMR 60.05, CO2 has been used to measure the GHG emissions impacts of transportation projects in the TIP and LRTP.
All TIP projects have been sorted into two categories for analysis: 1) projects with quantified CO2 impacts, and 2) projects with assumed CO2 impacts. Projects with quantified impacts consist of capacity-adding projects from the LRTP and projects from the TIP that underwent a Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) program spreadsheet analysis. Projects with assumed impacts are those that would be expected to produce a minor decrease or increase in emissions, and those that would be assumed to have no CO2 impact.
Projects with quantified impacts include capacity-adding projects in the LRTP that were analyzed using the Boston Region MPO’s travel demand model set. No independent calculations were done for these projects during the development of the TIP.
MassDOT’s Office of Transportation Planning provided spreadsheets that are used to determine projects’ eligibility for funding through the CMAQ program. Typically, MPO staff uses data from projects’ functional design reports, which are prepared at the 25-percent design phase, to conduct these calculations. Staff used these spreadsheets to calculate estimated projections of CO2 for each project, in compliance with GWSA regulations. These estimates are shown in Tables B-1 and B-2. A note of “to be determined” is shown for those projects for which a functional design report was not yet available.
As part of the development of the FFYs 2024–28 TIP, analyses were done for the types of projects described below. A summary of steps performed in the analyses is provided.
For an intersection reconstruction or signalization project that typically reduces delay and, therefore, idling, the following steps are taken:
For a shared-use path that would enable more walking and biking trips and reduce automobile trips, the following steps are taken:
For a program that replaces old buses with new buses that reduce emissions or run on cleaner fuel, the following steps are taken:
Calculations may be performed on the project types listed below:
Projects with assumed CO2 impacts are those that could produce a minor decrease or increase in emissions, but the change in emissions cannot be calculated with any precision. Examples include a bicycle rack installation, Safe Routes to School project, or transit marketing or customer service improvement. These projects are categorized as producing an assumed nominal increase or decrease in emissions.
Projects that do not change the capacity or use of a facility—for example, a resurfacing project that restores a roadway to its previous condition, or a bridge rehabilitation or replacement that restores the bridge to its previous condition—are assumed to have no CO2 impact. More details about these projects are discussed in Chapter 3. The following tables display the GHG impact analyses of projects funded in the FFYs 2023–27 Highway Program (Table B-1) and Transit Program (Table B-2). Table B-3 summarizes the GHG impact analyses of highway projects completed before FFY 2024. Table B-4 summarizes the GHG impact analyses of transit projects completed before FFY 2024. A project is considered completed when the construction contract has been awarded or the transit vehicles have been purchased.
Table B-1 | ||||
Greenhouse Gas Regional Highway Project Tracking: FFYs 2024-28 Programmed Projects | ||||
Project ID Number | Project Name | GHG Analysis Type | GHG CO2 Impact (kg/yr) | GHG Impact Description |
Federal Fiscal Year 2024 | ||||
110980 | NEWTON- WESTON- BRIDGE REHABILITATION, N-12-010=W-29-005, COMMONWEALTH AVENUE (ROUTE 30) OVER THE CHARLES RIVER | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
603739 | WRENTHAM- CONSTRUCTION OF ROUTE I-495/ROUTE 1A RAMPS | Quantified | 1,233,486 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Traffic Operational Improvement |
605313 | NATICK- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, N-03-020, ROUTE 27 (NORTH MAIN STREET) OVER ROUTE 9 (WORCESTER STREET) AND INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
606496 | BOSTON- BRIDGE REHABILITATION, B-16-052, BOWKER OVERPASS OVER MASS PIKE, MBTA/CSX, & IPSWICH STREET AND RAMPS (BINS 4FD, 4FG, 4FE, 4FF & 4FJ) | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
606901 | BOSTON- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, B-16-109, RIVER STREET BRIDGE OVER MBTA/AMTRAK | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
606902 | BOSTON- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, B-16-181, WEST ROXBURY PARKWAY OVER MBTA | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
607342 | MILTON- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 28 (RANDOLPH AVENUE) & CHICKATAWBUT ROAD | Quantified | 1,148,459 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Traffic Operational Improvement |
607777 | WATERTOWN- REHABILITATION OF MOUNT AUBURN STREET (ROUTE 16) | Quantified | 536,769 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
607977 | HOPKINTON- WESTBOROUGH- RECONSTRUCTION OF I-90/I-495 INTERCHANGE | Quantified | RTP project included in the statewide model | |
608007 | COHASSET- SCITUATE- CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS AND RELATED WORK ON JUSTICE CUSHING HIGHWAY (ROUTE 3A), FROM BEECHWOOD STREET TO HENRY TURNER BAILEY ROAD | Quantified | 5,849 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
608522 | MIDDLETON- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, M-20-003, ROUTE 62 (MAPLE STREET) OVER IPSWICH RIVER | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
608562 | SOMERVILLE- SIGNAL AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ON I-93 AT MYSTIC AVENUE AND MCGRATH HIGHWAY (TOP 200 CRASH LOCATION) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
609054 | LITTLETON- RECONSTRUCTION OF FOSTER STREET | Quantified | 1,140 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
609211 | PEABODY- INDEPENDENCE GREENWAY EXTENSION | Quantified | 36,612 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
609438 | CANTON- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, C-02-042, REVERE COURT OVER WEST BRANCH OF THE NEPONSET RIVER | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612034 | WOBURN- INTERSTATE PAVEMENT PRESERVATION AND RELATED WORK ON I-95 | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612048 | WALTHAM- INTERSTATE MAINTENANCE AND RELATED WORK ON I-95 | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
613196 | BURLINGTON- LYNNFIELD- WAKEFIELD- WOBURN- BRIDGE PRESERVATION OF 10 BRIDGES CARRYING I-95 | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
613209 | BOSTON- BRIDGE PRESERVATION, B-16-236 (39M, 39P, 39U, 39W, 39Y), 5 BRIDGES CARRYING STATE ROUTE 1A (EAST BOSTON EXPRESSWAY NB/SB) AND RAMPS | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
613211 | MEDFORD- BRIDGE PRESERVATION OF 10 BRIDGES CARRYING I-93 | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
S12114 | ROYALL STREET SHUTTLE | Quantified | 409,583 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12694 | NEWMO MICROTRANSIT SERVICE EXPANSION | Quantified | 91,800 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12697 | PLEASANT STREET SHUTTLE SERVICE EXPANSION | Quantified | 183,575 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12699 | STONEHAM SHUTTLE SERVICE | Quantified | 41,707 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12700 | CATA ON DEMAND MICROTRANSIT SERVICE EXPANSION | Quantified | 33,400 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12701 | MWRTA CATCHCONNECT MICROTRANSIT SERVICE EXPANSION | Quantified | 11,936 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12703 | MONTACHUSETT RTA MICROTRANSIT SERVICE | Quantified | 24,602 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12705 | LYNN STATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
S12802 | LYNN - BROAD STREET CORRIDOR TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY | Quantified | 1,328,755 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Traffic Operational Improvement |
S12803 | MEDFORD - BICYCLE PARKING (TIER 1) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
S12804 | MEDFORD - BLUEBIKES EXPANSION | Quantified | 4,561 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
S12805 | CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS BIKE PROGRAM | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
S12806 | CANTON CENTER BICYCLE RACKS | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
S12807 | MWRTA CATCHCONNECT MICROTRANSIT EXPANSION PHASE 2 | Quantified | 102,845 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12818 | ACTON PARKING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
S12819 | JACKSON SQUARE STATION ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
S12821 | RAIL TRANSFORMATION - EARLY ACTION ITEMS - READING STATION AND WILBUR INTERLOCKING | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
S12822 | COLUMBUS AVENUE BUS LANES PHASE 2 | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
S12823 | BOSTON - ELECTRIC BLUEBIKES ADOPTION | Quantified | 160,925 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
S12824 | CAMBRIDGE - ELECTRIC BLUEBIKES ADOPTION | Quantified | 66,559 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
Federal Fiscal Year 2025 | ||||
604564 | MAYNARD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, M-10-004, ROUTE 62 (MAIN STREET) OVER THE ASSABET RIVER | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
605168 | HINGHAM- IMPROVEMENTS ON ROUTE 3A FROM OTIS STREET/COLE ROAD INCLUDING SUMMER STREET AND ROTARY; ROCKLAND STREET TO GEORGE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD. | Quantified | 284,736 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
606453 | BOSTON- IMPROVEMENTS ON BOYLSTON STREET, FROM INTERSECTION OF BROOKLINE AVENUE & PARK DRIVE TO IPSWICH STREET | Quantified | 1,920,790 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
607684 | BRAINTREE- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, B-21-017, WASHINGTON STREET (ST 37) OVER MBTA/CSX RAILROAD | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
607977 | HOPKINTON- WESTBOROUGH- RECONSTRUCTION OF I-90/I-495 INTERCHANGE | Quantified | RTP project included in the statewide model | |
608051 | WILMINGTON- RECONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 38 (MAIN STREET), FROM ROUTE 62 TO THE WOBURN C.L. | Quantified | 492,167 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
608067 | WOBURN- INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION AT ROUTE 3 (CAMBRIDGE ROAD) & BEDFORD ROAD AND SOUTH BEDFORD STREET | Quantified | 168,263 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Traffic Operational Improvement |
608197 | BOSTON- BRIDGE REHABILITATION, B-16-107, CANTERBURY STREET OVER AMTRAK RAILROAD | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
608436 | ASHLAND- REHABILITATION AND RAIL CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS ON CHERRY STREET | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
608498 | QUINCY- WEYMOUTH- BRAINTREE- RESURFACING AND RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 53 | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
608703 | WILMINGTON- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, W-38-029 (2KV), ST 129 LOWELL STREET OVER I 93 | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
608952 | CHELSEA- BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE REPLACMENT C-09-013, WASHINGTON AVENUE, CARTER STREET & COUNTY ROAD/ROUTE 1 | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
609252 | LYNN- REHABILITATION OF ESSEX STREET | Quantified | 411,006 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
609257 | EVERETT- RECONSTRUCTION OF BEACHAM STREET | Quantified | 4,038 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
609399 | RANDOLPH- RESURFACING AND RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 28 | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
609467 | HAMILTON- IPSWICH- SUPERSTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT, H-03-002=I-01-006, WINTHROP STREET OVER IPSWICH RIVER | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
609516 | BURLINGTON- IMPROVEMENTS AT I-95 (ROUTE 128)/ROUTE 3 INTERCHANGE | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
609531 | ARLINGTON- STRATTON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS (SRTS) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
609532 | CHELSEA- TARGETED SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AND RELATED WORK ON BROADWAY, FROM WILLIAMS STREET TO CITY HALL AVENUE | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
610544 | PEABODY- MULTI-USE PATH CONSTRUCTION OF INDEPENDENCE GREENWAY AT I-95 AND ROUTE 1 | Quantified | 24,423 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
610680 | NATICK- LAKE COCHITUATE PATH | Quantified | 2,844 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
610722 | ACTON- BOXBOROUGH- LITTLETON- PAVEMENT PRESERVATION ROUTE 2 | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
610776 | CAMBRIDGE- SUPERSTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT, C-01-031, US ROUTE 3/ROUTE 16/ROUTE 2 OVER MBTA REDLINE | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
610782 | DANVERS- MIDDLETON- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, D-03-009=M-20-005, ANDOVER STREET (SR 114) OVER IPSWICH RIVER | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
611982 | MEDFORD- SHARED USE PATH CONNECTION AT THE ROUTE 28/WELLINGTON UNDERPASS | Quantified | 4,309 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
611997 | NEWTON- HORACE MANN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS (SRTS) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612001 | MEDFORD- MILTON FULLER ROBERTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (SRTS) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612028 | STONEHAM- DECK REPLACEMENT & SUPERSTRUCTURE REPAIRS, S-27-006 (2L2), (ST 28) FELLSWAY WEST OVER I-93 | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612100 | REVERE- IMPROVEMENTS AT BEACHMONT VETERANS ELEMENTARY (SRTS) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612173 | BELLINGHAM- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, B-06-022, MAPLE STREET OVER I-495 | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612178 | NATICK- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, N-03-010, SPEEN STREET OVER RR MBTA/CSX | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612182 | NEWTON- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, N-12-040, BOYLSTON STREET OVER GREEN LINE D | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612184 | REVERE- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, R-05-015, REVERE BEACH PARKWAY OVER BROADWAY | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612196 | BRAINTREE- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, B-21-067, JW MAHER HIGHWAY OVER MONATIQUOT RIVER | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
S12113 | TRANSIT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
S12124 | COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS PROGRAM | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
S12694 | NEWMO MICROTRANSIT SERVICE EXPANSION | Quantified | 91,800 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12697 | PLEASANT STREET SHUTTLE SERVICE EXPANSION | Quantified | 183,575 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12699 | STONEHAM SHUTTLE SERVICE | Quantified | 41,707 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12700 | CATA ON DEMAND MICROTRANSIT SERVICE EXPANSION | Quantified | 33,400 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12701 | MWRTA CATCHCONNECT MICROTRANSIT SERVICE EXPANSION | Quantified | 11,936 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12703 | MONTACHUSETT RTA MICROTRANSIT SERVICE | Quantified | 24,602 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12807 | MWRTA CATCHCONNECT MICROTRANSIT EXPANSION PHASE 2 | Quantified | 102,845 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12819 | JACKSON SQUARE STATION ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
S12820 | BIKESHARE SUPPORT SET ASIDE | Not Applicable | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
S12825 | BOSTON MPO REGION - FFY2025 PROJECT DESIGN PILOT | Not Applicable | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
Federal Fiscal Year 2026 | ||||
605321 | NORWOOD- BRIDGE PRESERVATION, N-25-026, PROVIDENCE HIGHWAY (STATE ROUTE 1) OVER THE NEPONSET RIVER | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
605743 | IPSWICH- RESURFACING & RELATED WORK ON CENTRAL & SOUTH MAIN STREETS | Quantified | 4,356 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
605857 | NORWOOD- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS @ ROUTE 1 & UNIVERSITY AVENUE/EVERETT STREET | Quantified | 1,092,131 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Traffic Operational Improvement |
606449 | CAMBRIDGE- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, C-01-008, FIRST STREET BRIDGE & C-01-040, LAND BOULEVARD/BROAD CANAL BRIDGE | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
607977 | HOPKINTON- WESTBOROUGH- RECONSTRUCTION OF I-90/I-495 INTERCHANGE | Quantified | RTP project included in the statewide model | |
608045 | MILFORD- REHABILITATION ON ROUTE 16, FROM ROUTE 109 TO BEAVER STREET | Quantified | -38,500 | Quantified Increase in Emissions |
608564 | WATERTOWN- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 16 AND GALEN STREET | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
608940 | WESTON- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS BOSTON POST ROAD (ROUTE 20) AT WELLESLEY STREET | Quantified | 102,453 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Traffic Operational Improvement |
608954 | WESTON- RECONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 30 | Quantified | 357,681 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
609204 | BELMONT- COMMUNITY PATH, BELMONT COMPONENT OF THE MCRT (PHASE I) | Quantified | 26,347 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
609437 | SALEM- PEABODY- BOSTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS | Quantified | 58,773 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
610537 | BOSTON- ELLIS ELEMENTARY TRAFFIC CALMING (SRTS) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
610662 | WOBURN- ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT WOBURN COMMON, ROUTE 38 (MAIN STREET), WINN STREET, PLEASANT STREET AND MONTVALE AVENUE | Quantified | 736,275 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Traffic Operational Improvement |
610665 | STONEHAM- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 28 (MAIN STREET), NORTH BORDER ROAD AND SOUTH STREET | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
610675 | CHELSEA- RECONSTRUCTION OF SPRUCE STREET, FROM EVERETT AVENUE TO WILLIAMS STREET | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
611954 | BOSTON- GUIDE AND TRAFFIC SIGN REPLACEMENT ON I-90/I-93 WITHIN CENTRAL ARTERY/TUNNEL SYSTEM | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
611974 | MEDFORD- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT MAIN STREET/SOUTH STREET, MAIN STREET/MYSTIC VALLEY PARKWAY RAMPS, AND MAIN STREET/MYSTIC AVENUE | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612049 | RANDOLPH- RESURFACING AND RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 24 | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612050 | BRAINTREE- WEYMOUTH- RESURFACING AND RELATED WORK ON ROUTE 3 | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612051 | CANTON- MILTON- RANDOLPH- INTERSTATE MAINTENANCE AND RELATED WORK ON I-93 | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612075 | SALEM- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, S-01-024, JEFFERSON AVENUE OVER PARALLEL STREET | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612076 | TOPSFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, T-06-013, PERKINS ROW OVER MILE BROOK | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612099 | ASHLAND- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, A-14-006, CORDAVILLE ROAD OVER SUDBURY RIVER | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612496 | SOMERVILLE- BRIDGE PRESERVATION, S-17-031, I-93 (NB & SB) FROM ROUTE 28 TO TEMPLE STREET (PHASE 2) | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612523 | REVERE- STATE ROAD BEACHMONT CONNECTOR | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612599 | LYNN- TARGETED SAFETY AND MULTIMODAL IMPROVEMENTS (PLAYBOOK PRIORITY CORRIDORS) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612804 | DEDHAM- IMPROVEMENTS AT AVERY ELEMENTARY (SRTS) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612816 | BROOKLINE- IMPROVEMENTS AT WILLIAM H. LINCOLN SCHOOL (SRTS) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612884 | CHELSEA- IMPROVEMENTS AT MARY C. BURKE ELEMENTARY (SRTS) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612889 | SHARON- COTTAGE STREET SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS (SRTS) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612894 | FRAMINGHAM- IMPROVEMENTS AT HARMONY GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (SRTS) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612989 | BOSTON- BRIDGE PRESERVATION, B-16-066 (38D), CAMBRIDGE STREET OVER MBTA | Quantified | 5,400 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Traffic Operational Improvement |
S12113 | TRANSIT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
S12124 | COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS PROGRAM | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
S12807 | MWRTA CATCHCONNECT MICROTRANSIT EXPANSION PHASE 2 | Quantified | 102,845 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from New/Additional Transit Service |
S12820 | BIKESHARE SUPPORT SET ASIDE | Not Applicable | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
Federal Fiscal Year 2027 | ||||
605276 | BEVERLY- SALEM- DRAWBRIDGE REPLACEMENT/REHABILITATION OF B-11-005=S-01-013, KERNWOOD AVENUE OVER DANVERS RIVER | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
605743 | IPSWICH- RESURFACING & RELATED WORK ON CENTRAL & SOUTH MAIN STREETS | Quantified | 4,356 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
605857 | NORWOOD- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS @ ROUTE 1 & UNIVERSITY AVENUE/EVERETT STREET | Quantified | 1,092,131 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Traffic Operational Improvement |
606226 | BOSTON- RECONSTRUCTION OF RUTHERFORD AVENUE, FROM CITY SQUARE TO SULLIVAN SQUARE | Quantified | RTP project included in the statewide model | |
606728 | BOSTON- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT B-16-365, STORROW DRIVE OVER BOWKER RAMPS | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
607329 | WAKEFIELD- LYNNFIELD- RAIL TRAIL EXTENSION, FROM THE GALVIN MIDDLE SCHOOL TO LYNNFIELD/PEABODY T.L. | Quantified | 158,032 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
607420 | NATICK- SUPERSTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT, N-03-012, BODEN LANE OVER CSX/MBTA | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
607977 | HOPKINTON- WESTBOROUGH- RECONSTRUCTION OF I-90/I-495 INTERCHANGE | Quantified | RTP project included in the statewide model | |
607981 | SOMERVILLE- MCGRATH BOULEVARD CONSTRUCTION | Quantified | 136,345 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
608514 | BEVERLY- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, B-11-001, BRIDGE STREET OVER BASS RIVER (HALL-WHITAKER DRAWBRIDGE) | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
609246 | LYNN- REHABILITATION OF WESTERN AVENUE (ROUTE 107) | Quantified | 902,708 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
610650 | BOSTON- GALLIVAN BOULEVARD (ROUTE 203) SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, FROM WASHINGTON STREET TO GRANITE AVENUE | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
610660 | SUDBURY- WAYLAND- MASS CENTRAL RAIL TRAIL (MCRT) | Quantified | TBD | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
610932 | BROOKLINE- REHABILITATION OF WASHINGTON STREET | Quantified | 36,431 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
611983 | CHELSEA- PARK STREET & PEARL STREET RECONSTRUCTION | Quantified | 10,214 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Complete Streets Project |
611987 | CAMBRIDGE- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, C-01-026, MEMORIAL DRIVE OVER BROOKLINE STREET | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612499 | MEDFORD- SOUTH MEDFORD CONNECTOR BIKE PATH | Quantified | TBD | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
612519 | BOSTON- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, B-16-165, BLUE HILL AVENUE OVER RAILROAD | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
612613 | NEWTON- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 16 AND QUINOBEQUIN ROAD | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612615 | CANTON- MILTON- ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 138, FROM ROYALL STREET TO DOLLAR LANE | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
612616 | MILTON- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT ROUTE 138 AND BRADLEE ROAD | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
613088 | MALDEN- SPOT POND BROOK GREENWAY | Quantified | 77,012 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure |
613121 | EVERETT- TARGETED MULTI-MODAL AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ON ROUTE 16 (DESIGN ONLY) | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |
S12113 | TRANSIT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
S12124 | COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS PROGRAM | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |
S12820 | BIKESHARE SUPPORT SET ASIDE | Not Applicable | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions |
Table B-2 | |||||||
Greenhouse Gas Regional Transit Project Tracking: FFYs 2024-28 Programmed Projects | |||||||
Regional Transit Authority | Project ID Number | Project Name | GHG Analysis Type | GHG CO2 Impact (kg/yr) | GHG Impact Description | ||
Federal Fiscal Year 2024 | |||||||
CATA | RTD0010579 | CATA - Preventive Maintenance | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010583 | CATA - buy misc small capital | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010584 | CATA - acquire shop equip/small capital | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010587 | CATA - repave admin/ops facility parking lot | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | T00073 | CATA - Rehab/Renovation Administration & Operations Facility | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011103 | MetroWest RTA - Operating Assistance - Non Fixed Route ADA Paratransit Service | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011104 | MetroWest RTA - Acquisition of Bus Support / Facilities Equipment | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011105 | MetroWest RTA - Technology Support/Capital Outreach | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011106 | MetroWest RTA - Blandin Intermodal | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011107 | MetroWest RTA - FCRS Intermodal - Framingham Commuter Rail Station (FCRS) | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011114 | MetroWest RTA - 5339 STATEWIDE - Vehicle Replacements (16 cutaways) | Quantified | 807,026 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bus Replacement | ||
MWRTA | RTD0011123 | MetroWest RTA - 5339 STATEWIDE - 2024 EV (Electric Vehicle) Migration | Qualitative | Qualitative Decrease in Emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011130 | MetroWest RTA - 5339 DISCRETIONARY - Blandin Hub Projects | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | T00037 | MetroWest RTA - CNG Dispensers (2) at the Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | T00038 | MetroWest RTA - Electronic Sign Board | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA011468 | Columbus Ave. Bus Lane Ph. II | Quantified | 98,855 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Other Improvements | ||
MBTA | MBTA011470 | Jackson Sq. Station Access Impr. | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA011472 | Rail Transformation - Early Action | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA015 | 5307 Revenue Vehicle Program | Quantified | 29,791,730 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bus Replacement | ||
MBTA | MBTA016 | 5307 Signals/Systems Upgrade Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA017 | 5307 Stations and Facilities Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA018 | 5337 Bridge & Tunnel Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA019 | 5337 Revenue Vehicle Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA020 | 5337 Signals/Systems Upgrade Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA021 | 5337 Stations and Facilities Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA022 | 5339 Bus Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA024 | RRIF/TIFIA Financing Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA025 | Lynn Station Improvements | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
Federal Fiscal Year 2025 | |||||||
CATA | RTD0010579 | CATA - Preventive Maintenance | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010583 | CATA - buy misc small capital | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010584 | CATA - acquire shop equip/small capital | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010591 | CATA - Revenue Vehicle Replacement | Quantified | TBD | Impact on emissions will be calculated when specific projects are chosen for funding through this program | ||
CATA | T00073 | CATA - Rehab/Renovation Administration & Operations Facility | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011109 | MetroWest RTA - ACQUISITION OF BUS SUPPORT EQUIP/FACILITIES | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011110 | MetroWest RTA - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT/CAPITAL OUTREACH | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011111 | MetroWest RTA - TERMINAL, INTERMODAL (TRANSIT) - BLANDIN | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011112 | MetroWest RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE NON FIXED ROUTE ADA PARA SERV | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011115 | MetroWest RTA - 5339 COMPETITIVE REVENUE VEHICLE REPLACEMENT - DISCRETIONARY | Quantified | 807,026 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bus Replacement | ||
MWRTA | RTD0011121 | MetroWest RTA - TERMINAL, INTERMODAL (TRANSIT) - Framingham Commuter Rail Station (FCRS) | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011124 | MetroWest RTA - 5339 COMPETITIVE 2025 ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) ADDTL ELECTRIFICATION COSTS - DISCRETIONARY | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011133 | MetroWest RTA - AFC TRANSITION - MOBILE FARE COLL EQUIP | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011134 | MetroWest RTA - PUBLIC RESTROOMS AT BLANDIN & FCRS HUBS - DISCRETIONARY | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011137 | MetroWest RTA - VEHICLE REPLACEMENT - CUTAWAYS (8) #2 of 2 | Quantified | 432,335 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bus Replacement | ||
MBTA | MBTA011474 | Jackson Sq. Station Access Impr. (CMAQ) | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA027 | 5307 Bridge & Tunnel Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA028 | 5307 Revenue Vehicle Program | Quantified | TBD | Impact on emissions will be calculated when specific projects are chosen for funding through this program | ||
MBTA | MBTA029 | 5307 Signals/Systems Upgrade Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA030 | 5307 Stations and Facilities Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA031 | 5337 Bridge & Tunnel Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA032 | 5337 Revenue Vehicle Program | Quantified | TBD | Impact on emissions will be calculated when specific projects are chosen for funding through this program | ||
MBTA | MBTA033 | 5337 Signals/Systems Upgrade Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA034 | 5337 Stations and Facilities Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA035 | 5339 Bus Program | Quantified | TBD | Impact on emissions will be calculated when specific projects are chosen for funding through this program | ||
MBTA | MBTA036 | RRIF Financing - PTC/ATC/Fiber | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA037 | RRIF/TIFIA Financing Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
Federal Fiscal Year 2026 | |||||||
CATA | RTD0010579 | CATA - Preventive Maintenance | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010583 | CATA - buy misc small capital | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010584 | CATA - acquire shop equip/small capital | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010591 | CATA - Revenue Vehicle Replacement | Quantified | TBD | Impact on emissions will be calculated when specific projects are chosen for funding through this program | ||
CATA | T00073 | CATA - Rehab/Renovation Administration & Operations Facility | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011116 | MetroWest RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE NON FIXED ROUTE ADA PARA SERV | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011117 | MetroWest RTA - TERMINAL, INTERMODAL (TRANSIT) - BLANDIN | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011118 | MetroWest RTA - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT/CAPITAL OUTREACH | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011119 | MetroWest RTA - ACQUISITION OF BUS SUPPORT EQUIP/FACILITIES | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011120 | MetroWest RTA - TERMINAL, INTERMODAL (TRANSIT) - Framingham Commuter Rail Station | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011125 | MetroWest RTA - 2026 ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) ADDTL ELECTRIFICATION COSTS | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011126 | MetroWest RTA - 5339 COMPETITIVE REVENUE VEHICLE REPLACEMENT - DISCRETIONARY | Quantified | 518,802 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bus Replacement | ||
MWRTA | RTD0011138 | MetroWest RTA - VEHICLE REPLACEMENT - CUTAWAYS (8) #2 of 2 | Quantified | 518,802 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bus Replacement | ||
MBTA | MBTA040 | 5307 Bridge & Tunnel Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA041 | 5307 Revenue Vehicle Program | Quantified | TBD | Impact on emissions will be calculated when specific projects are chosen for funding through this program | ||
MBTA | MBTA042 | 5307 Signals/Systems Upgrade Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA043 | 5307 Stations and Facilities Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA044 | 5337 Bridge & Tunnel Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA045 | 5337 Revenue Vehicle Program | Quantified | TBD | Impact on emissions will be calculated when specific projects are chosen for funding through this program | ||
MBTA | MBTA046 | 5337 Signals/Systems Upgrade Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA047 | 5337 Stations and Facilities Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA048 | 5339 Bus Program | Quantified | TBD | Impact on emissions will be calculated when specific projects are chosen for funding through this program | ||
MBTA | MBTA049 | RRIF Financing - PTC/ATC/Fiber | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA050 | RRIF/TIFIA Financing Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
Federal Fiscal Year 2027 | |||||||
CATA | RTD0010579 | CATA - Preventive Maintenance | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010583 | CATA - buy misc small capital | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010584 | CATA - acquire shop equip/small capital | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | T00073 | CATA - Rehab/Renovation Administration & Operations Facility | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011195 | MetroWest RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE NON FIXED ROUTE ADA PARA SERV | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011196 | MetroWest RTA - TERMINAL, INTERMODAL (TRANSIT) - BLANDIN | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011197 | MetroWest RTA - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT/CAPITAL OUTREACH | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011198 | MetroWest RTA - ACQUISITION OF BUS SUPPORT EQUIP/FACILITIES | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011199 | MetroWest RTA - TERMINAL, INTERMODAL (TRANSIT) - Framingham Commuter Rail Station | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011200 | MetroWest RTA - 5339 COMPETITIVE REVENUE VEHICLE REPLACEMENT - DISCRETIONARY | Quantified | 504,391 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bus Replacement | ||
MWRTA | RTD0011201 | MetroWest Regional Transit Authority - ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) ADDTL ELECTRIFICATION COSTS | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011202 | MetroWest RTA - VEHICLE REPLACEMENT - Cutaways #2 of 2 | Quantified | 576,447 | Quantified Decrease in Emissions from Bus Replacement | ||
MWRTA | RTD0011267 | MetroWest RTA - EV - Additional Electrification for Vehicles | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA053 | 5307 Bridge & Tunnel Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA054 | 5307 Revenue Vehicle Program | Quantified | TBD | Impact on emissions will be calculated when specific projects are chosen for funding through this program | ||
MBTA | MBTA055 | 5307 Signals/Systems Upgrade Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA056 | 5307 Stations and Facilities Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA057 | 5337 Bridge & Tunnel Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA058 | 5337 Revenue Vehicle Program | Quantified | TBD | Impact on emissions will be calculated when specific projects are chosen for funding through this program | ||
MBTA | MBTA059 | 5337 Signals/Systems Upgrade Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA060 | 5337 Stations and Facilities Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MBTA | MBTA061 | 5339 Bus Program | Quantified | TBD | Impact on emissions will be calculated when specific projects are chosen for funding through this program | ||
MBTA | MBTA063 | RRIF/TIFIA Financing Program | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
Federal Fiscal Year 2028 | |||||||
CATA | RTD0010579 | CATA - Preventive Maintenance | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010583 | CATA - buy misc small capital | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | RTD0010584 | CATA - acquire shop equip/small capital | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
CATA | T00073 | CATA - Rehab/Renovation Administration & Operations Facility | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011195 | MetroWest RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE NON FIXED ROUTE ADA PARA SERV | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011196 | MetroWest RTA - TERMINAL, INTERMODAL (TRANSIT) - BLANDIN | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011197 | MetroWest RTA - TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT/CAPITAL OUTREACH | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||
MWRTA | RTD0011198 | MetroWest RTA - ACQUISITION OF BUS SUPPORT EQUIP/FACILITIES | Qualitative | No assumed impact/negligible impact on emissions | |||