| TIP ID | |
| Project Name | |
| Description | |
| Category | |
| Municipality | |
| Subregion | |
| Proponent | |
| MPO Investment Program | |
| STIP Program | |
| Overall Evaluation Score |
| Project Length | |
| Existing Lane-Miles | |
| Lane-Miles Added or Improved | |
| Total Lane-Miles | |
| Sidewalk Miles | |
| Sidewalk Miles Improved | |
| Miles of Exisiting On-road Bicycle Facilities | |
| Miles of Exisiting Off-road Bicycle Facilities |
| FDR On File? | |
| Approved by PRC? | |
| Year of PRC Approval | |
| Design Status | |
| Date of Design Status Update | |
| Adds Capacity? | |
| LRTP Project? | |
| Current Cost Estimate | |
| Project Update Date | |
| Funding Status | |
| LRTP Identified Need? | |
| Amount Programmed | |
| Municipal Priority |
| Proponent | Contact Name | Contact Information |
| Crash Data Years | |
| Project in HSIP Cluster | |
| Total ADT | |
| Crash Rate | |
| Intersection Type | |
| Urban Federal Functional Class | |
| Crash Rate Score (up to 5 points) |
| Number of Fatal Crashes | |
| Number of Crashes with Injuries | |
| Number of Crashes with Property Damage | |
| Total Number of Crashes | |
| EPDO | |
| EPDO of Crash Cluster with Highest EPDO in Project Area | |
| Crash Severity Value Score (up to 5 points) |
| Number of Crashes Involving Pedestrians | |
| Existing Pedestrian Facilities | |
| Existing Pedestrian Safety Issues | |
| Existing Pedestrian Use | |
| Description of Existing Pedestrian Use | |
| Description of Desired Pedestrian Use | |
| Proposed Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures | |
| Effectiveness of Proposed Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures | |
| Effectiveness of Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures Score (up to 3 points) | |
| Project in Pedestrian HSIP Cluster | |
| Bonus for Improving Safety at Pedestrian HSIP Cluster (up to 2 points) |
| Number of Crashes Involving Bicyclists | |
| Existing Bicycle Facilities | |
| Existing Bicycle Safety Issues | |
| Existing Bicycle Use | |
| Description of Existing Bicycle Use | |
| Description of Desired Bicycle Use | |
| Proposed Bicycle Safety Countermeasures | Database field to read is TBD. |
| Effectiveness of Proposed Bicycle Safety Countermeasures | |
| Effectiveness of Bicycle Safety Countermeasures Score (up to 3 points) | |
| Project in Bicycle HSIP Cluster | |
| Bonus Score for Improving Safety at Bicycle HSIP Cluster (up to 2 points) |
| Truck ADT | |
| Number of Truck Crashes | |
| Existing Roadway Deficiency for Trucks | |
| Proposed Truck Safety Countermeasures | |
| Effectiveness of Proposed Truck Safety Countermeasures | |
| Improves Truck Safety Score (up to 3 points) | |
| Bonus Score for Improving Safety at HSIP Cluster (2 points) |
| Project Area Includes At-grade Railroad Crossing | |
| Type of Safety Improvement of At-grade Railroad Crossing | |
| Description of At-grade Railroad Crossing Improvements | |
| Improves Safety at Railroad Crossing Score (up to 5 points) |
| Overall Safety Score (up to 30 points) |
| Project Includes Bridge Improvements | |
| Improves Substandard Bridge Score (up to 3 points) |
| Pavement IRI Value | |
| IRI Rating | |
| IRI Data Year | |
| Description of Existing Pavement Condition | |
| Improves Substandard Pavement Score (up to 6 points) |
| Number of Existing Signals in Project Area | |
| Number of Existing Signals to Be Improved | |
| Description of Existing Signal Condition | |
| Planned Signal Improvements Included in Project | |
| Improves Substandard Traffic Signals Score (up to 6 points) |
| Project Brings Existing Transit Asset into State of Good Repair | |
| Description of Improvements to Transit Asset Included in Project | |
| Project Meets Identified Need in Asset Management Plan | |
| Improves Transit Asset(s) Score (up to 3 points) |
| Existing Sidewalk Condition Rating | |
| Existing Sidewalk Condition Description | |
| Proposed Sidewalk Improvements Included in Project | |
| Improved Substandard Sidewalks Score (up to 3 points) |
| Project Located in Hurricane Evacuation Zone | |
| Project Improves Emergency Evacuation Route | |
| Emergency Support Facilities Located within 1/4 Mile of Project | |
| Name(s) of Emergency Support Facilities in Project Area | |
| Project Improves Access to Emergency Support Facilities | |
| Description of Improvements to Emergency Support Facility Access Included In Project | |
| Improves Emergency Response Score (up to 2 points) |
| Project Lies within a Flood Zone | |
| Description of Flooding-Related Problems in Project Area and how Project Addresses them | |
| Project Brings Facility up to Current Seismic Standards | |
| Description of Seismic Standard Deficiencies and how Project Addresses them | |
| Project Addresses Critical Transportation Infrastructure | |
| Description of how Project Addresses Critical Transportation Infrastructure | |
| Project Helps to Implement Hazard Mitigation and/or Climate Adaptation Plan | |
| Description of Project Contribution to Hazard Mitigation / Climate Adaptation Plan | |
| Project Protects Freight Network Elements | |
| Improves Response to Other Extreme Conditions Score (up to 6 points) |
| Overall System Preservation Score (up to 29 points) |
Bridges
| BDEPT | Bridge Rating | AASHTO Rating | Year Built | Year Rebuilt |
| MBTA Bus Routes on Project Roadways | |
| Other Transit Routes on Project Roadways | |
| Daily Transit Runs on Project Roadways | |
| No-build Signal Delay | |
| Build Signal Delay | |
| Change in Signal Delay | |
| Change in Transit Vehicle Delay | |
| Reduces Transit Vehicle Delay Base Score (up to 3 points) | |
| Project Improves Key Bus Route(s) | |
| Improves Key Bus Route(s) Bonus Score (up to 1 point) |
| Vehicle Delay Change | |
| Reduces Vehicle Congestion Score (up to 6 points) |
| Project Adds New Sidewalks | |
| Project Includes ADA Accessibility Improvements | |
| Project Closes an Identified Gap in the Pedestrian Network | |
| Description of Existing Gap in the Pedestrian Network | |
| Improves Pedestrian Network and ADA Accessibility Score (up to 5 points) |
| Project Closes an Identified Gap in the Bicycle Network | |
| Description of Existing Gap in the Bicycle Network | |
| Improves Bicycle Network Score (up to 4 points) |
| Description of Improvements to Transit Connections | |
| Transit Connection Improvement Assessment | |
| Level of Intermodal Facility Use | |
| Description of Intermodal Facility Use | |
| Improves Intermodal Connections to Transit Score (up to 6 points) |
| Existing Truck-related Roadway Conditions | |
| Description of Truck-related Roadway Deficiencies | |
| Magnitude of Truck Movement Improvements | |
| Project Area Includes MPO-identified Bottleneck Location(s) | |
| Improves Truck Movement Score (up to 4 points) |
| Overall Capacity Management / Mobility Score (up to 29 points) |
| Project is Located in an EOEEA-certified Green Community | |
| EOEEA-certified Green Community Score (up to 2 points) |
| CO2 Impact - Change in Annual Tons | |
| Reduces CO2 Score (up to 5 points) | |
| Other Emissions (VOC, NOx, CO) Impact - Change in Annual Tons | |
| Reduces Other Emissions Score (up to 5 points) |
| Project Includes Stormwater Best Management Practices | |
| Description of Stormwater Best Management Practices Included in Project | |
| Project Includes Improvements to Cultural Resources / Open Space | |
| Description of Cultural Resources / Open Space Improvements Included in Project | |
| Project Enhances or Improves Wetlands Resources | |
| Description of Wetlands Resources Improvements Included in Project | |
| Project Enhances or Improves Wildlife Preservation Areas / Protected Habitats | |
| Description of Wildlife Preservation Improvements Included in Project | |
| Addresses Environmental Impacts Score (up to 4 points) |
| Overall Clean Air / Sustainable Communities Score (up to 16 points) |
| Percentage of Population in Project Area that is Minority | |
| Minority Population in Project Area | |
| Concentration of Minority Population in Project Area | |
| Serves Minority Population Score (up to 2 points) |
| Percentage of Low-Income Households in Project Area | |
| Low-Income Households in Project Area | |
| Concentration of Low-Income Households in Project Area | |
| Serves Low-Income Households Score (up to 2 points) |
| Percentage of Limited-English Proficient (LEP) Population in Project Area | |
| LEP Population in Project Area | |
| Concentration of LEP Population in Project Area | |
| Serves LEP Population Score (up to 2 points) |
| Percentage of Elderly (Over 75) Population in Project Area | |
| Elderly Population in Project Area | |
| Concentration of Elderly Population in Project Area | |
| Serves Elderly Population Score (up to 2 points) |
| Percentage of Zero-vehicle Households in Project Area | |
| Zero-vehicle Households in Project Area | |
| Concentration of Zero-vehicle Households in Project Area | |
| Serves Zero-vehicle Households Score (up to 2 points) |
| Percentage of Population with Disabilities in Project Area | |
| Population with Disabilities in Project Area | |
| Concentration of Population with Disabilities in Project Area | |
| Serves Persons with Disabilities Score (up to 2 points) |
| Project Creates a Burden for Title VI / Non-discrimination Populations | |
| Score Penalty for Creating a Burden for Title VI / Non-discrimination |
| Overall Transportation Equity Score (up to 12 points) |
| Project Serves a Targeted Economic Development Site | |
| Name of Targeted Development Site | |
| Description of Access Improvements to Targeted Development Site | |
| Description of New or Improved Transit Access to or within Site | |
| Project Provides for Bicycle Access to or within Targeted Development Site | |
| Project Provides for Pedestrian Access to or within Targeted Development Site | |
| Project Provides for Improved Road Access to or within Targeted Development Site | |
| Serves Targeted Development Site Score (up to 6 points) |
| Area of Concentrated Development is Present in the Project Area | |
| Project Mostly or Partly Serves an Area of Concentrated Development | |
| Project Area has Zoning or Other Regulations Supportive of Smart Growth | |
| Project Area is Served by a Commercial District Organization | |
| Name of Commercial District Organization | |
| Provides for Development Consistent with MetroFuture Score (up to 5 points) |
| Project Improves Transit Access to an Area of High Economic Activity | |
| Project Improves Pedestrian Access to an Area of High Economic Activity | |
| Project Improves Bicycle Access to an Area of High Economic Activity | |
| Project Improves Truck Access to an Area of High Economic Activity | |
| Project Improves Multimodal Access to an Activity Center Score (up to 4 points) |
| Type of non-TIP Investment in Project | |
| Percentage of Project Cost Covered by non-TIP Investments | |
| Leverages Other Investments Score (up to 3 points) |
| Overall Economic Vitality Score (up to 18 points) |